If I like the idea, I'm gonna buy one.
Is there any real difference between the 3 models?
If it was on looks alone, I think I'd head for the KTM (spit). And probably better resale value.
Waddya reckon?


Standard?darthpunk wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 2:17 pm Husky, I just prefer the colours and KTM is a bit more seen on the road.
what wheels though?
Oh. Bollox.darthpunk wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 2:24 pm I just read the first line of the post, I take it they'll all be supermoto versions? I just meant because the Gas Gas and Husky are on knobblys and bigger wheels
Yup. A bit daft reallyMrLongbeard wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:09 pm They all look so lardy because of the side / back plastics and end can
It's going nowhere near dirt.KungFooBob wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:12 pm The Gas Gas, just because it's got cast wheels... I assume you can run them tubeless, they'll also be lighter.
If you're going to use it as a proper SM and take it on the dirt too, stick to the spokes.
Going by my EC300, the suspension and brakes are all different.Bigyin wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 4:06 pm Which ever colour or badge you like as they are the same bike apart from the cast/spokes wheel![]()
well, it's the fuel tank. So not exactly daft as bikes kinda need one. So the 'plastics' isn't a plastic in the usual sense, as it's a fuel tank over the whole back end on one side.Yorick wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:11 pmYup. A bit daft reallyMrLongbeard wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:09 pm They all look so lardy because of the side / back plastics and end can![]()
I reckon your experience of SMs, and 690s are 2 different things. Of the several we've had here only Taipan's had an issue. I put 15k miles on mine and know of 2 with 40k miles on them. There was a bloke on the Adv forum who put 80k miles on his Enduro. For what it is it's a tough engine and 2016s on with the different head design don't have the rockers that can fail which was what cost Taipan.