VFR1200F DCT
- dern
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1016 times
- Been thanked: 1766 times
VFR1200F DCT
Picked this up this morning and did roughly 100 miles on it. Took a picture next to the bins to set it off nicely (didn't notice until later)...
Bits I have reservations about first...
The rear is a bit bouncy, I'll set the preload and up the compression and see how that is before doing anything more dramatic.
Drive mode (auto) on the gearbox is not great. It tries to change up very early and leaves the engine labouring. I knew it would do this and I'll probably not use it unless I'm on the motorway.
Everything else...
This bike does everything better than the KTM. It's smooth, much easier to ride, feels way faster and the wind protection is superb. The steering is slower so I have to get used to putting more input in to the steering but everything else is so much better than the 1190 I don't mind.
The engine is epic. I've read that it's limited under 4000rpm in 1st and second and generally lacks push below 4000rpm. Yeah, I guess but I just ride it above 4000rpm, just like every other bike I've had, and it pulls really well and sounds good. Overtaking is piss easy, just cheese it and it's gone.
The chassis is very very stable. A bit slow to steer and the rear needs firming up but it feels so so solid.
The brakes will take some time to get used to as they're very good indeed and I need to learn to modulate the braking pressure more.
The wind protection is superb, far better than the KTM. I wish I'd had this on the trip to France. I did an overtake and while on the KTM I'd be hanging on like an Ewok, this was superb. So much so that I didn't notice the speed I'd reached and had to shed speed sharpish.
The gearbox in drive isn't much good as I said above, it changes up to soon. In sport mode it's very good. In manual mode it's absolutely superb. For some reason it seems to be able to anticipate the next gear I want in manual mode with more success than in sport with me choosing a gear now and again. When it's got the next gear that you want ready the changes are seamless and lightening fast. If it's got the wrong gear selected then getting the right one for you is very quick but there's more of a clunk.
Great bike and fits in the garage. It's a lot smaller than I thought. It's like a fat fireblade, in a good way.
Bits I have reservations about first...
The rear is a bit bouncy, I'll set the preload and up the compression and see how that is before doing anything more dramatic.
Drive mode (auto) on the gearbox is not great. It tries to change up very early and leaves the engine labouring. I knew it would do this and I'll probably not use it unless I'm on the motorway.
Everything else...
This bike does everything better than the KTM. It's smooth, much easier to ride, feels way faster and the wind protection is superb. The steering is slower so I have to get used to putting more input in to the steering but everything else is so much better than the 1190 I don't mind.
The engine is epic. I've read that it's limited under 4000rpm in 1st and second and generally lacks push below 4000rpm. Yeah, I guess but I just ride it above 4000rpm, just like every other bike I've had, and it pulls really well and sounds good. Overtaking is piss easy, just cheese it and it's gone.
The chassis is very very stable. A bit slow to steer and the rear needs firming up but it feels so so solid.
The brakes will take some time to get used to as they're very good indeed and I need to learn to modulate the braking pressure more.
The wind protection is superb, far better than the KTM. I wish I'd had this on the trip to France. I did an overtake and while on the KTM I'd be hanging on like an Ewok, this was superb. So much so that I didn't notice the speed I'd reached and had to shed speed sharpish.
The gearbox in drive isn't much good as I said above, it changes up to soon. In sport mode it's very good. In manual mode it's absolutely superb. For some reason it seems to be able to anticipate the next gear I want in manual mode with more success than in sport with me choosing a gear now and again. When it's got the next gear that you want ready the changes are seamless and lightening fast. If it's got the wrong gear selected then getting the right one for you is very quick but there's more of a clunk.
Great bike and fits in the garage. It's a lot smaller than I thought. It's like a fat fireblade, in a good way.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6893
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2402 times
- Been thanked: 3625 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
A mate of mine had one and loved it, but had similar reservations about the suspension. He wound up sticking an Ohlins on the rear and Ohlins internals in the forks. After that he couldn't fault it. My only concern with them is the all up weight. A wet weight of 267 kg (589 lbs) would give me major concern pushing it around on anything other than flat, smooth tarmac.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23417
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5450 times
- Been thanked: 13085 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
I didn't know it was auto. Interesting stuff, makes me more intrigued how you get on with it.
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5455
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1745 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5455
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1745 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
I had an 800, and that was a lardy beast. 267kg would be waaaay too much for me. I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
Anyway, enjoy it. It is a Honda, a mile muncher, so munch some miles.
Anyway, enjoy it. It is a Honda, a mile muncher, so munch some miles.
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
The 800 (air cooled) or 850 (oil) were nicer to ride than the bigger engines.Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:23 pm I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
But, since they were the same bike just with smaller holes, they were equally lardy
Even bland can be a type of character
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6893
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2402 times
- Been thanked: 3625 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Are you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?Horse wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:47 pmThe 800 (air cooled) or 850 (oil) were nicer to ride than the bigger engines.Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:23 pm I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
But, since they were the same bike just with smaller holes, they were equally lardy
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Cousin Jack fought in WW1 so we let him off these faux pas.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pmAre you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?Horse wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:47 pmThe 800 (air cooled) or 850 (oil) were nicer to ride than the bigger engines.Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:23 pm I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
But, since they were the same bike just with smaller holes, they were equally lardy
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6893
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2402 times
- Been thanked: 3625 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Except that Cousin Jack knows his VFR onions, but Horse apparently doesn't...KungFooBob wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:16 pmCousin Jack fought in WW1 so we let him off these faux pas.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pmAre you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Sorry, missed the important, nay essential, qualifier of 'BMW twins'.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pmAre you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?Horse wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:47 pmThe 800 (air cooled) or 850 (oil) were nicer to ride than the bigger engines.Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:23 pm I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
But, since they were the same bike just with smaller holes, they were equally lardy
Even bland can be a type of character
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
He knows a bit about them. But doesn't often post about themmangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:22 pmExcept that Cousin Jack knows his VFR onions, but Horse apparently doesn't...KungFooBob wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:16 pmCousin Jack fought in WW1 so we let him off these faux pas.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pm
Are you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?
Even bland can be a type of character
- Skub
- Posts: 12167
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 9825 times
- Been thanked: 10144 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Honda made a BMW?Horse wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:22 pmSorry, missed the important, nay essential, qualifier of 'BMW twins'.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pmAre you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
- dern
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1016 times
- Been thanked: 1766 times
- dern
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1016 times
- Been thanked: 1766 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
The 800 made 105bhp, this makes at least 160bhp. This feels significantly faster than my 636 and that has more power than the 800 and was a lot lighter.Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 8:23 pm I had an 800, and that was a lardy beast. 267kg would be waaaay too much for me. I never understood the 1200, the 800 motor was a peach, ride it on the torque in 2v mode, or 4v for the hooligan in you. The 1200 was no quicker, just bigger an heavier.
Anyway, enjoy it. It is a Honda, a mile muncher, so munch some miles.
I sat on an 800 and it was ok but felt pretty small.
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Filly doesn't know much about bikes, but called Pans "Honda's BMW"Skub wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:24 pmHonda made a BMW?Horse wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:22 pmSorry, missed the important, nay essential, qualifier of 'BMW twins'.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 9:15 pm
Are you talking about the same engines/bikes? VFRs were always water-cooled and the only engine sizes were 750, 800 or 1200...?
Even bland can be a type of character
- dern
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1016 times
- Been thanked: 1766 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
To be honest that swung it for me. I was extremely curious to see what it would be like. So far I love it but it’s at its best when it’s in manual. In manual mode though, apart from pulling away, it acts like a very good quick shifter. It’s even got the optional foot shifter fitted.
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5455
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1745 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11805
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6376 times
- Been thanked: 4751 times
Re: VFR1200F DCT
Re the soft rear end, it seems to be a thing with tourer set up that the default is 'comfort' ie soggy. Has it got EAS? Either way changing the rear shock parameters should sort it.
(Just nosing about on the Internet for info on the WP made unit on my old bike, wondering if they're an alternative to Ohlins if you wanted to change it, and found that they're now wholly owned by KTM. Didn't know that).
(Just nosing about on the Internet for info on the WP made unit on my old bike, wondering if they're an alternative to Ohlins if you wanted to change it, and found that they're now wholly owned by KTM. Didn't know that).
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire