In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

General chat topics, anything and everything you want or need to discuss
User avatar
Pirahna
Posts: 1942
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:31 pm
Has thanked: 1814 times
Been thanked: 1163 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Pirahna »

There's still WW1 munitions exploding in France and Belgium. There's also the Red Zones where it's too contaminated to access the land.
User avatar
Cousin Jack
Posts: 4450
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Location: Down in the Duchy
Has thanked: 2549 times
Been thanked: 2285 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Cousin Jack »

gremlin wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:48 am You know when they evacuate hundreds of people due to an old WWII bomb being found and you think, 'Is it really likely to go off after all these decades..?'

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cy430j48kjyo

:wtf: :lol:
Some explosives degrade over time and become less likely to go bang, some explosives get more sensitive.
Cornish Tart #1

Remember An Gof!
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 808 times
Been thanked: 4793 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by gremlin »

Mr Moofo wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:55 am [
And they still work about the Richard Montgomery - TBF, who cares of the Isle of Sheppey is destroyed!
They say that if it goes bang it could cause over £500 million worth of improvements...
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
David
Posts: 2134
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 8:50 am
Location: Top 'o the Worle
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 689 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by David »

gremlin wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 3:14 pm
Mr Moofo wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:55 am [
And they still work about the Richard Montgomery - TBF, who cares of the Isle of Sheppey is destroyed!
They say that if it goes bang it could cause over £500 million worth of improvements...

Last time i went past that in a boat, some locals were fishing over it.
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 808 times
Been thanked: 4793 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by gremlin »

David wrote: Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:57 am
gremlin wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 3:14 pm
Mr Moofo wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:55 am [
And they still work about the Richard Montgomery - TBF, who cares of the Isle of Sheppey is destroyed!
They say that if it goes bang it could cause over £500 million worth of improvements...

Last time i went past that in a boat, some locals were fishing over it.
They plan to remove the tops of the masts (very carefully, one presumes) as people like to go out and climb on it at low tide for a selfie and Insta views. Should it go bang whilst they are gooning about on it, they'll have considerably more views I reckon. :lol:
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 808 times
Been thanked: 4793 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by gremlin »

Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
MrLongbeard
Posts: 4579
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
Has thanked: 599 times
Been thanked: 2428 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by MrLongbeard »

LOL, I read that yesterday and had a good chuckle at the paper pushers pissing so much money up the wall with their paperwork that they could have built the Oslo tunnel many times over.

In this little corner of the country we were awarded a £4 million grant for flood defences, which are sorely needed, IIRC they've pissed 2 - 3 million up the wall on planning, surveys, consultations etc. and are now scrabbling about to raise funds as they can no longer afford the actual work :angry-cussingblack:
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 11803
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 6375 times
Been thanked: 4746 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Count Steer »

gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too. :lol:
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one
.
Voltaire
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 808 times
Been thanked: 4793 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by gremlin »

Count Steer wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:35 pm
gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too. :lol:
Planning in this country does seem to be ripe for a shake up. Remember the debacle over Heathrow T5?

BAA formally announced its proposal for construction of Terminal 5 in May 1992, submitting a formal planning application on 17 February 1993.[4][5] A public inquiry into the proposals began on 16 May 1995 and lasted nearly four years, finally ending on 17 March 1999 after sitting for 525 days. The inquiry, based at the Renaissance Hotel Heathrow, was the longest planning inquiry ever held in the UK.[6] Finally, more than eight years after the initial planning application, Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Byers announced on 20 November 2001 the British government's decision to grant planning permission for the building of a fifth passenger terminal at Heathrow.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13944
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15947 times
Been thanked: 10243 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Taipan »

If its anything to do with TBC (Thurrock Borough Council) then financial incompetence and general stupidity is to be expected. The proposed tunnel is in the wrong place. Its practically next door to the Thurruck crossing and will do nothing to ease congestion at peak times, more likely just increase it!

That stretch of the A13 if often gridlocked at peak times, so to relieve it the new crossing should have gone from Canvey Island which is fed by the relatively new 4 lane A130 and kept traffic off teh A13. There has been campaigns and demands for a wider route off of Canvey for as long as I can remember and this could have been addressed at the same time.
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 808 times
Been thanked: 4793 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by gremlin »

Taipan wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:09 pm There has been campaigns and demands for a wider route off of Canvey for as long as I can remember
Imagine if they built a link between Canvey and Sheppy....residents would go from 6 fingers on the left hand to having two heads. :P

Apparently it's Tilbury - Gravesend-ish.

https://nationalhighways.co.uk/our-road ... -crossing/
Last edited by gremlin on Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 11803
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 6375 times
Been thanked: 4746 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Count Steer »

gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:53 pm
Count Steer wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:35 pm
gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too. :lol:
Planning in this country does seem to be ripe for a shake up. Remember the debacle over Heathrow T5?

BAA formally announced its proposal for construction of Terminal 5 in May 1992, submitting a formal planning application on 17 February 1993.[4][5] A public inquiry into the proposals began on 16 May 1995 and lasted nearly four years, finally ending on 17 March 1999 after sitting for 525 days. The inquiry, based at the Renaissance Hotel Heathrow, was the longest planning inquiry ever held in the UK.[6] Finally, more than eight years after the initial planning application, Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Byers announced on 20 November 2001 the British government's decision to grant planning permission for the building of a fifth passenger terminal at Heathrow.
In a shorter timescale than that they've planned and built a completely new international airport in Istanbul. :D
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one
.
Voltaire
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 11549
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 6186 times
Been thanked: 5087 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Horse »

Not really light hearted ...

https://news.sky.com/story/british-adve ... e-13231900

The foot was found encased in a sock with the name "AC Irvine" embroidered on it by a climbing team on the North Face of the 8,849-metre mountain.
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
Mussels
Posts: 4438
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
Has thanked: 836 times
Been thanked: 1238 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Mussels »

gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
Here's something else not so amusing, Labour love to milk a good Thames crossing. I hope they are going to be fair and tax all the bridges as well.
https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2024/07/10/ ... -revealed/
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13944
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15947 times
Been thanked: 10243 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Taipan »

Mussels wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:01 pm
gremlin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?

Not very amusing answer: c. £800m

The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...

https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526

And still the can is being kicked down the road.
Here's something else not so amusing, Labour love to milk a good Thames crossing. I hope they are going to be fair and tax all the bridges as well.
https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2024/07/10/ ... -revealed/
Tolls on all of them soon and you cant go past them to any of the free bridges without going into the congestion/ulez charge. :x Strategic or what! Pay per mile soon too...
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13936
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2550 times
Been thanked: 6241 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

SpaceX just successfully chopsticked their booster.

Which sounds made up, but isn't.

One of those things you'd never think was possible until you see it. If someone posted a video of it you'd say "Fake! That's reversed footage".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cq8xpz598zjt
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16735
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10261 times
Been thanked: 6885 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Yorick »

Fuck me. Wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it :obscene-birdiedoublered:
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cly57d5jw7eo
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 11803
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 6375 times
Been thanked: 4746 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Count Steer »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2024 1:56 pm SpaceX just successfully chopsticked their booster.

Which sounds made up, but isn't.

One of those things you'd never think was possible until you see it. If someone posted a video of it you'd say "Fake! That's reversed footage".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cq8xpz598zjt
Well, I've seen it and I'm still not sure I believe it! :lol:

Bonkers!
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one
.
Voltaire
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13936
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2550 times
Been thanked: 6241 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Said to my parents (who just happened to be visiting htis weekend).

"They" worry about North Korea and Iran's weapons and missile programmes, meanwhile you've got a private company who've just demonstrated a highly reusable ICBM launched from a private pad without government assistance :lol:

Also note how they had a prepositioned floating camera buoy ready to film the splash down of the upper stage, so after a ~10,000 mile flight (of a vehicle which can carry over 100 tonnes don't forget) they managed to land within a few hundred metres of their 'target'.

Mental :D
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 11549
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 6186 times
Been thanked: 5087 times

Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news

Post by Horse »

Yorick wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2024 6:04 pm Fuck me. Wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it :obscene-birdiedoublered:
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cly57d5jw7eo
Did you read Dazzles post immediately before yours? :shhh:
Even bland can be a type of character :wave: