In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
- Pirahna
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1814 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
There's still WW1 munitions exploding in France and Belgium. There's also the Red Zones where it's too contaminated to access the land.
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Some explosives degrade over time and become less likely to go bang, some explosives get more sensitive.gremlin wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:48 am You know when they evacuate hundreds of people due to an old WWII bomb being found and you think, 'Is it really likely to go off after all these decades..?'
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cy430j48kjyo
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
They say that if it goes bang it could cause over £500 million worth of improvements...
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
-
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 8:50 am
- Location: Top 'o the Worle
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 689 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Last time i went past that in a boat, some locals were fishing over it.
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
They plan to remove the tops of the masts (very carefully, one presumes) as people like to go out and climb on it at low tide for a selfie and Insta views. Should it go bang whilst they are gooning about on it, they'll have considerably more views I reckon.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- MrLongbeard
- Posts: 4580
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
- Has thanked: 599 times
- Been thanked: 2428 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
LOL, I read that yesterday and had a good chuckle at the paper pushers pissing so much money up the wall with their paperwork that they could have built the Oslo tunnel many times over.
In this little corner of the country we were awarded a £4 million grant for flood defences, which are sorely needed, IIRC they've pissed 2 - 3 million up the wall on planning, surveys, consultations etc. and are now scrabbling about to raise funds as they can no longer afford the actual work
In this little corner of the country we were awarded a £4 million grant for flood defences, which are sorely needed, IIRC they've pissed 2 - 3 million up the wall on planning, surveys, consultations etc. and are now scrabbling about to raise funds as they can no longer afford the actual work
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6375 times
- Been thanked: 4750 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Planning in this country does seem to be ripe for a shake up. Remember the debacle over Heathrow T5?Count Steer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:35 pm£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
BAA formally announced its proposal for construction of Terminal 5 in May 1992, submitting a formal planning application on 17 February 1993.[4][5] A public inquiry into the proposals began on 16 May 1995 and lasted nearly four years, finally ending on 17 March 1999 after sitting for 525 days. The inquiry, based at the Renaissance Hotel Heathrow, was the longest planning inquiry ever held in the UK.[6] Finally, more than eight years after the initial planning application, Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Byers announced on 20 November 2001 the British government's decision to grant planning permission for the building of a fifth passenger terminal at Heathrow.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- Taipan
- Posts: 13945
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15949 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
If its anything to do with TBC (Thurrock Borough Council) then financial incompetence and general stupidity is to be expected. The proposed tunnel is in the wrong place. Its practically next door to the Thurruck crossing and will do nothing to ease congestion at peak times, more likely just increase it!
That stretch of the A13 if often gridlocked at peak times, so to relieve it the new crossing should have gone from Canvey Island which is fed by the relatively new 4 lane A130 and kept traffic off teh A13. There has been campaigns and demands for a wider route off of Canvey for as long as I can remember and this could have been addressed at the same time.
That stretch of the A13 if often gridlocked at peak times, so to relieve it the new crossing should have gone from Canvey Island which is fed by the relatively new 4 lane A130 and kept traffic off teh A13. There has been campaigns and demands for a wider route off of Canvey for as long as I can remember and this could have been addressed at the same time.
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Imagine if they built a link between Canvey and Sheppy....residents would go from 6 fingers on the left hand to having two heads.
Apparently it's Tilbury - Gravesend-ish.
https://nationalhighways.co.uk/our-road ... -crossing/
Last edited by gremlin on Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6375 times
- Been thanked: 4750 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
In a shorter timescale than that they've planned and built a completely new international airport in Istanbul.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:53 pmPlanning in this country does seem to be ripe for a shake up. Remember the debacle over Heathrow T5?Count Steer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:35 pm£800M?! Strewth. They could have not built 16 garden bridges across the Thames with that. You could probably not have built the Thames Estuary Airport with it and had change left over to not increase the size of the Thames Barrier too.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
BAA formally announced its proposal for construction of Terminal 5 in May 1992, submitting a formal planning application on 17 February 1993.[4][5] A public inquiry into the proposals began on 16 May 1995 and lasted nearly four years, finally ending on 17 March 1999 after sitting for 525 days. The inquiry, based at the Renaissance Hotel Heathrow, was the longest planning inquiry ever held in the UK.[6] Finally, more than eight years after the initial planning application, Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Byers announced on 20 November 2001 the British government's decision to grant planning permission for the building of a fifth passenger terminal at Heathrow.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Not really light hearted ...
https://news.sky.com/story/british-adve ... e-13231900
The foot was found encased in a sock with the name "AC Irvine" embroidered on it by a climbing team on the North Face of the 8,849-metre mountain.
https://news.sky.com/story/british-adve ... e-13231900
The foot was found encased in a sock with the name "AC Irvine" embroidered on it by a climbing team on the North Face of the 8,849-metre mountain.
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 4438
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 836 times
- Been thanked: 1238 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Here's something else not so amusing, Labour love to milk a good Thames crossing. I hope they are going to be fair and tax all the bridges as well.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2024/07/10/ ... -revealed/
- Taipan
- Posts: 13945
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15949 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Tolls on all of them soon and you cant go past them to any of the free bridges without going into the congestion/ulez charge. Strategic or what! Pay per mile soon too...Mussels wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:01 pmHere's something else not so amusing, Labour love to milk a good Thames crossing. I hope they are going to be fair and tax all the bridges as well.gremlin wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:54 pm Here's a riddle for you? How much does it cost to NOT build a tunnel?
Not very amusing answer: c. £800m
The looooong debated Lower Thames Crossing, which would join Kent to Essex (not sure who gets the shittiest end of that stick), has cost just shy of a yard of your money and mine, not to be built...
https://news.sky.com/story/thames-tunne ... l-13230526
And still the can is being kicked down the road.
https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2024/07/10/ ... -revealed/
-
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 6244 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
SpaceX just successfully chopsticked their booster.
Which sounds made up, but isn't.
One of those things you'd never think was possible until you see it. If someone posted a video of it you'd say "Fake! That's reversed footage".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cq8xpz598zjt
Which sounds made up, but isn't.
One of those things you'd never think was possible until you see it. If someone posted a video of it you'd say "Fake! That's reversed footage".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cq8xpz598zjt
- Yorick
- Posts: 16736
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10263 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Fuck me. Wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cly57d5jw7eo
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cly57d5jw7eo
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6375 times
- Been thanked: 4750 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Well, I've seen it and I'm still not sure I believe it!Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 1:56 pm SpaceX just successfully chopsticked their booster.
Which sounds made up, but isn't.
One of those things you'd never think was possible until you see it. If someone posted a video of it you'd say "Fake! That's reversed footage".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cq8xpz598zjt
Bonkers!
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
-
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 6244 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Said to my parents (who just happened to be visiting htis weekend).
"They" worry about North Korea and Iran's weapons and missile programmes, meanwhile you've got a private company who've just demonstrated a highly reusable ICBM launched from a private pad without government assistance
Also note how they had a prepositioned floating camera buoy ready to film the splash down of the upper stage, so after a ~10,000 mile flight (of a vehicle which can carry over 100 tonnes don't forget) they managed to land within a few hundred metres of their 'target'.
Mental
"They" worry about North Korea and Iran's weapons and missile programmes, meanwhile you've got a private company who've just demonstrated a highly reusable ICBM launched from a private pad without government assistance
Also note how they had a prepositioned floating camera buoy ready to film the splash down of the upper stage, so after a ~10,000 mile flight (of a vehicle which can carry over 100 tonnes don't forget) they managed to land within a few hundred metres of their 'target'.
Mental
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6187 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: In todays light hearted look at the (non-political) news
Did you read Dazzles post immediately before yours?Yorick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 6:04 pm Fuck me. Wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it
.
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cly57d5jw7eo
Even bland can be a type of character