I use GenAI for work. It does a reasonable job but it's like having a bunch of work experience kids that churn loads of work out but need a lot of checking.
In the decking example it hasn't created that good advice, it's pinched it from someone else without credit. I fear people will be less likely to create original content and AI will be left to learn from a bunch of adverts left by other AI bots, the internet will become dumber.
Claude (genai) is smarter than me.
-
Mussels
- Posts: 5041
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 781 times
- Been thanked: 1072 times
- Rockburner
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
- Location: Hiding in your blind spot
- Has thanked: 10959 times
- Been thanked: 3995 times
Re: Claude (genai) is smarter than me.
From what I've read, that's already happening, a) quite badly, and b) faster than expected.Mussels wrote: Tue Jul 14, 2026 8:05 am I use GenAI for work. It does a reasonable job but it's like having a bunch of work experience kids that churn loads of work out but need a lot of checking.
In the decking example it hasn't created that good advice, it's pinched it from someone else without credit. I fear people will be less likely to create original content and AI will be left to learn from a bunch of adverts left by other AI bots, the internet will become dumber.
non quod, sed quomodo
-
v8-powered
- Posts: 3051
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:37 pm
- Location: Colchester
- Has thanked: 2848 times
- Been thanked: 1609 times
Re: Claude (genai) is smarter than me.
I'm also in the camp of using AI in my job - I have to review a lot of technical submissions for compliance against 100's of standards, and AI helps massively. It's not always 100% correct but does save me a lump of time!Mussels wrote: Tue Jul 14, 2026 8:05 am I use GenAI for work. It does a reasonable job but it's like having a bunch of work experience kids that churn loads of work out but need a lot of checking.
