Beancounter wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:16 pmI seem to recall my R1100RT feeling smoother than my 1150GSA. The 1100 didn't feel lighter but was/is easier to manoeuvre if you've got stumpy legs like myself.Taipan wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:31 amI’ve no idea if the 1100 is lighter, but it felt it? I always felt the 1150 was a bit more ponderous! It felt that compared to my Rockster as well! Maybe there was something wrong with it lol!Count Steer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:26 am
Any enlightenment on why? Lighter? Free-er spinning engine?......
I do think the 'beak' on the 1150 was better looking than either the 1100 and the 1200+s.
Just to add my own experiences...5 BMWs, (1150, 1200 flat twins, old K12, new K12, 850 parallel twin, no issues, no warranty work, no post-warranty problems. The only bump in the road was the ABS light came on on the K12LT when riding home after buying it from Big Nige. IIRC it either didn't happen again or it was solved at first service.
Oddly - I have always found the XX00 engines a touch 'rougher' than the XX50 engines:
eg comparing my brother's R1100S to the R1150Rockster to the early R1200GS that I tested.
But that's a very subjective (seat of the pants) impression from riding bikes made at different times and at different points in their lives (and at different states of tune).
I can't remember what it was that FLASH said made him prefer the 1100 - I think it was something about it being only a 5-speed rather than a 6 speed, so there's less gear changing?
I've not ridden an R100GS so I can't say how different they are from the R1150GS, but the R1150GS is a touch more ponderous than the Rockster, personally I put that down to the extra height, and the (slightly) narrower bars of the GS. The Rockster can be thrown hard into a corner because of the increased leverage of the bars, and the suspension isn't quite as wallowy (because there's a shorter range of movement).
Can't wait to get out on My Rockster again - I've only done about 50 miles on the new Nitron shocks.