Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Discussing your new helmet, jacket, boots, luggage
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 5896
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2115 times
Been thanked: 2998 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by mangocrazy »

Hot_Air wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 9:50 am I’ll praise the video: Ryan put his head above the parapet by highlighting regulatory capture with manufacturers setting the CE standards. (Manufacturers outnumber everyone else on the CE and BSI standards committees. And Dainese chaired the CE standards committee.)

@Horse While armour provides abrasion resistance, it’s neither tested nor certified for it. Instead, our armour is certified and marketed for impact protection — inferring reduced fracture risk.

Roderick Woods developed a Level 3 armour standard, and Paul Varnsverry argued for more appropriately-sized armour; both were blocked by regulatory capture.
So who regulates the regulators? At some point in the pyramid there will be a committee that decides the make-up of the regulatory board. I'd wager your mortgage that such a committee is firmly under the thumb of the manufacturers. It's what they do and it's called lobbying.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
Felix
Posts: 3505
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:34 am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Felix »

As soon as a get a new jacket they are first part to come out as well as the liner. I just find it all to uncomfortable and sometimes restrictive.
User avatar
Rockburner
Posts: 3810
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
Location: Hiding in your blind spot
Has thanked: 6907 times
Been thanked: 2071 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Rockburner »

Felix wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 11:31 am As soon as a get a new jacket they are first part to come out as well as the liner. I just find it all to uncomfortable and sometimes restrictive.
Same - but I fit in the old Hein Gericke HiProtec Sport armour instead - it's as flexible as any cloth, and more protective than any hard foam crap. Shame they stopped making it. I know the D30 stuff is probably better, but I find it's still a little too stiff for proper comfort.
non quod, sed quomodo
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 10641
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 5380 times
Been thanked: 4599 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Horse »

MrLongbeard wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:51 am
Horse wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:00 am Coincidental that impact absorbing armour aids abrasion resistance!
Here's a thought.....

Is the trend towards lighter, thinner, more flexible armour materials (D3O etc.) having a negative trend with regards to abrasion resistance? Are we sacrificing unintentional abrasion resistance in chasing a questionable higher impact resistance when we ditch the bulky hard OEM CE1 armour?
It struck me, ages ago, that it should be possible to '3D weave' fabrics to increase abrasion resistance in shaped areas. Such as elbows. Equivalent to multiple layers of leather.

And some manufacturers add exterior hard plastic (or metal?) sliders in very vulnerable areas.

What you're saying makes sense, but it would need detailed materials knowledge. Stuff like D3O - AFAIK - 'hardens' under impact. It could require multilayer materials?

The first off-the-peg armoured motorcycle gear of any sort was, AFAIK, Aerostich in the States then ProTek here (1988).

That ProTek armour then was two layer foam. The back protector was soft (camping mat) foam with a hard carapace.

Things have moved on. But along the way included stuff that didn't work if wet, or crumbled apart.
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
User avatar
MrLongbeard
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
Has thanked: 500 times
Been thanked: 2037 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by MrLongbeard »

Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 12727
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2456 times
Been thanked: 5593 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Horse wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 1:15 pm It struck me, ages ago, that it should be possible to '3D weave' fabrics to increase abrasion resistance in shaped areas.
This is why shoelaces are braided, rather than twisted. The high degree of interlacement (no pun intended) and the multiple fibres (12-24 woven, rather than just being 3 or 4 twisted) means they're much more resistant to abrasion, which is what you want in a shoelace.

Same reason you get both braided and woven cables. Different characteristics.

Well....the other reason you get copper/ally braided cable is that it's much harder to unpick them and extract just the copper, making them less tempting targets of theft :D
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 5896
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2115 times
Been thanked: 2998 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by mangocrazy »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 1:12 pm Well....the other reason you get copper/ally braided cable is that it's much harder to unpick them and extract just the copper, making them less tempting targets of theft :D
The other (other) reason cables are braided is to reduce crosstalk between strands.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 12727
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2456 times
Been thanked: 5593 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Rich test engineers buy fancy twisted and braided shield cables to wire their sensors to be resitant to EMC.

Smart ones use Cat 6 cable stolen from IT :thumbup:
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 10641
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 5380 times
Been thanked: 4599 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Horse »

The pic is my mtb armour
For the pedal people:

https://koroyd.com/BodyProtection

Going beyond traditional impact protection, KOROYD has innovated a best-in-class solution engineered to change the way you feel when wearing body protection. This has been achieved through new research and a new understanding of how you really move when riding your bike.

Biomechanics, bike geometry, suspension dynamics, terrain interaction and energy transfer have all been scrutinised as part of a holistic approach that treats you and your bike as a complete system.

This has led to a new range that not only delivers excellent body protection but also achieves levels of rider comfort and mobility previously thought to be unattainable – until now.
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
User avatar
MrLongbeard
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
Has thanked: 500 times
Been thanked: 2037 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by MrLongbeard »

Horse wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:27 am
The pic is my mtb armour
For the pedal people:

https://koroyd.com/BodyProtection

Going beyond traditional impact protection, KOROYD has innovated a best-in-class solution engineered to change the way you feel when wearing body protection. This has been achieved through new research and a new understanding of how you really move when riding your bike.

Biomechanics, bike geometry, suspension dynamics, terrain interaction and energy transfer have all been scrutinised as part of a holistic approach that treats you and your bike as a complete system.

This has led to a new range that not only delivers excellent body protection but also achieves levels of rider comfort and mobility previously thought to be unattainable – until now.
Ahhh, the old 'bullshit baffles brains' approach to marketing PPE
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 10641
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 5380 times
Been thanked: 4599 times

Re: Why I stopped wearing motorcycle body armour

Post by Horse »

MrLongbeard wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:31 am Ahhh, the old 'bullshit baffles brains' approach to marketing PPE
My favourite biking example is Klim, talking about the retroreflective patches.

Apparently placed according to biomotion principles.

Which is fantastic when you want to highlight / identity a moving pedestrian.

But absolutely no use for helping detect a motorcycle and rider. The rider is static.

https://lcfh-expedition.com/en/news-kli ... cognition/
Klkm wrote: Klim motorcycle gear
News: KLIM Bio Motion Recognition
Safety starts by being seen!

“Fast and clear recognisability” is the primary safety factor regardless what time of year. The shape and arrangement of reflectors on KLIM made products are chosen to ensure the wearer is immediately detected and noticed as a motorcyclist.
Here's ankle bands enhancing pedestrian identification.




Horse wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:27 am Going beyond traditional impact protection, KOROYD has innovated a best-in-class solution engineered to change the way you feel when wearing body protection. This has been achieved through new research and a new understanding of how you really move when riding your bike.

First armour I had was ProTek, in one of their jackets.

The elbow/forearm armour was articulated - two piece - to allow for movement. That was 1988 ...
Even bland can be a type of character :wave: