Page 1 of 1

valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:49 pm
by Deadpool2
I have been given some artwork by friends, who are students. They were damaged during a water leak. How can I assess the value for them?

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:54 pm
by gremlin
Deadpool2 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:49 pm I have been given some artwork by friends, who are students. They were damaged during a water leak. How can I assess the value for them?
I doubt they would have any 'collectible' value. The limit of the claim is probably the cost of the canvas and paints.

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:10 pm
by Yambo
Art has no intrinsic value.

You could cart them all off to an auction house where they might put a value on them i.e. what they might sell for but otherwise, gremlin is right.

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:21 pm
by Count Steer
What would it cost to commission copies/replacements? Might be worth pitching that at the insurance company?

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:08 pm
by Horse
gremlin wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:54 pm
Deadpool2 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:49 pm I have been given some artwork by friends, who are students. They were damaged during a water leak. How can I assess the value for them?
I doubt they would have any 'collectible' value. The limit of the claim is probably the cost of the canvas and paints.
If they were particularly valuable, you would have needed to have them insured specifically at that value.

Have your friends sold any equivalent work? Use that as a guide.

But note that things like jewellery are often worth no more than weigh-in for their metal.

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:52 pm
by gremlin
westers151 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:42 pm
Yambo wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:10 pm Art has no intrinsic value.

You could cart them all off to an auction house where they might put a value on them i.e. what they might sell for but otherwise, gremlin is right.
For unknown artists, I'd agree, but your de Vincis, Turner, van Gogh, etc, would have a value that's a bit more than the oil and canvas :D
Tommy Cooper had it right....


Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:52 pm
by Mr. Dazzle
Yambo wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:10 pm Art has no intrinsic value.
If it had intrinsic value, it wouldn't be art.

Can't remember who said it, but it's something along the lines of "To be considered art, an item must have no purpose other than to just be itself".

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2023 8:43 am
by Deadpool2
cheers all

Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes

Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:43 am
by Skub
Mr. Dazzle wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:52 pm Can't remember who said it, but it's something along the lines of "To be considered art, an item must have no purpose other than to just be itself".
That's me right there. I must be art. 8-)