I think I've seen that Japanese work before.
Anyway, I'm intrigued as to why the Japanese authors believed the car drivers thought the motorcycles would give way when turning right across the riders' path.
I've heard this 'riders look down more' idea numerous times. I'm dubious that it's a real issue.
"Mean fixation duration of motorcyclists is shorter than that of automobile drivers. This suggests that they are acquiring and identifying information relatively superficially."
Why? It could equally mean they are processing the visual information more quickly.
Reading around the problem, my estimation of the SMIDSY collision isn't that the rider doesn't see the car, it's that the rider doesn't see the car AS A THREAT... until it pulls out.
There are around 100 fatal SMIDSY collisions at junctions each year (2019 figures) and I'd estimate around 1000 serious injury collisions. I don't think anyone has ever tried to count drops taking avoiding action, slow-speed bumps and near-misses but whatever the figure is, it's out of 1.4 million bikes travelling 4 billion miles and sharing the road with about 40 million cars, or thereabouts.
The SMIDSY might be the commonest bike crash, but it's still a pretty damn rare event when we consider our personal risk of having one.
I've been talking to Shel Smith... I was hoping we might get together for a chat whilst I was down in the South West in May and again last month, but she couldn't make it to my Science Of Being Seen presentations down there. I may well try getting an interview with her.
The point she makes about the various manuals not really covering forward observation skills is actually something I've been flagging up for a LONG time. It's all very well to say 'look', but we need to know WHERE, WHEN, HOW and WHY. It doesn't just happen - that's the reason I'm keen on developmental exercises such as the 'cueing' exercise I popped up a few days ago.
viewtopic.php?t=5742