Uk Media

Current affairs, Politics, News.
Wreckless Rat
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:25 am
Has thanked: 666 times
Been thanked: 704 times

Uk Media

Post by Wreckless Rat »

It’s utterly shit isn’t it.

Not a fan of the BBC news, but thought I’d give it a try this morning. Ffs how does anyone watch this with any interest in unbiased reporting.

ITV - well.... ffs

Is there any morning news worth watching? What do you watch for news in the morning. I generally don’t bother but... surely there is something that reports UK issues/news without blatant bias, or perhaps there isn’t,
User avatar
KungFooBob
Posts: 14117
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
Has thanked: 537 times
Been thanked: 7489 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by KungFooBob »

How about RT or Al Jazeera?
Wreckless Rat
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:25 am
Has thanked: 666 times
Been thanked: 704 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Wreckless Rat »

RT - Russia today? The name alone makes me think it’s got to be a tad biased, no?

Not tried AJ
Jody
Posts: 1714
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 11:49 am
Location: Biarritz in Summer, Cornwall In Autumn, Courchevel in Winter
Has thanked: 1947 times
Been thanked: 1292 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Jody »

It's worse than shit, it's disgraceful, an embarrassment to the UK :(
User avatar
Trinity765
Posts: 2320
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:27 pm
Location: Brighton
Has thanked: 2440 times
Been thanked: 2397 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Trinity765 »

It is shit, yes! I dont have a tv so I don't watch the BBC News or anything else. I have an occasional scoot around the internet, BBC, the local news website, RT, Al Jazeera, RTTL to get a rough idea (bombs, earthquakes, tsunamis) and then I make the rest up myself. Uber drivers are a more reliable way of find out what's really going on. I've looked into cancelling my TV licence and you only need one if you watch something live - I'm happy to wait an hour and watch a recording. I may do it - it feels rebellious.
User avatar
Rockburner
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
Location: Hiding in your blind spot
Has thanked: 7768 times
Been thanked: 2514 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Rockburner »

I don't watch TV anymore, what are the BBC news doing/saying that is coming across as biased? (and which way is it biased?)
non quod, sed quomodo
User avatar
Rockburner
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
Location: Hiding in your blind spot
Has thanked: 7768 times
Been thanked: 2514 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Rockburner »

Trinity765 wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:26 am It is shit, yes! I dont have a tv so I don't watch the BBC News or anything else. I have an occasional scoot around the internet, BBC, the local news website, RT, Al Jazeera, RTTL to get a rough idea (bombs, earthquakes, tsunamis) and then I make the rest up myself. Uber drivers are a more reliable way of find out what's really going on. I've looked into cancelling my TV licence and you only need one if you watch something live - I'm happy to wait an hour and watch a recording. I may do it - it feels rebellious.
These days you need the licence to watch iPlayer.
non quod, sed quomodo
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13892
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2547 times
Been thanked: 6219 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Philosophical question for ya...

How do you know they're all biased, if they're all biased?
JamJar
Posts: 674
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:00 am
Has thanked: 257 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by JamJar »

Rockburner wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:26 am I don't watch TV anymore, what are the BBC news doing/saying that is coming across as biased? (and which way is it biased?)
I see people on the left and the right complaining about it being biased which makes me think maybe it isn't.
User avatar
Trinity765
Posts: 2320
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:27 pm
Location: Brighton
Has thanked: 2440 times
Been thanked: 2397 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Trinity765 »

Rockburner wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:27 am
Trinity765 wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:26 am It is shit, yes! I dont have a tv so I don't watch the BBC News or anything else. I have an occasional scoot around the internet, BBC, the local news website, RT, Al Jazeera, RTTL to get a rough idea (bombs, earthquakes, tsunamis) and then I make the rest up myself. Uber drivers are a more reliable way of find out what's really going on. I've looked into cancelling my TV licence and you only need one if you watch something live - I'm happy to wait an hour and watch a recording. I may do it - it feels rebellious.
These days you need the licence to watch iPlayer.
They can have their iplayer. I've practically given up watching films too, all make believe stuff. I tend to find documentaries to watch if anything and there's plenty of free ones about.
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16688
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10227 times
Been thanked: 6865 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Yorick »

I check the BBC website for sport each morning.
Then look at news headlines and open any which look interesting. I can pick out the facts from the waffle.

No problems :)
User avatar
DEADPOOL
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:13 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by DEADPOOL »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:27 am Philosophical question for ya...

How do you know they're all biased, if they're all biased?
The key issue is polarisation. "News reporters" these days are more like celebrities than impartial information providers. They may have a personal agenda or simply have to support the particular narrative a channel has chosen to champion. Any information will either be biased in its presentation with the choice use of key words (the baying mob to describe a crowd for example) or information which may tend to contradict the narrative is simply ignored.

It is so easy to see it makes me cross because they are treating the audience as mindless fools. I cancelled my license fee some time ago or I would risk throwing something large and heavy at the TV. The TV "receiver" is now a media portal, I use it for YouTube. Have a look at the left wing nonsense, compare and contrast with the right wing nonsense, pick out the truth.

How often do we see the victim of a gangland murder portrayed as a harmless schoolboy only to discover a quick Google reveals pictures of a hardened criminal posing as a gangsta? How is it possible to describe an event as a "mostly peaceful" "protest" when an entire high street has just been smashed, looted and burned to the ground?

Something else you might watch out for is the language. Every single "news" channel will describe an event using the exact same stock phrase. As if they are all preaching from the same hymn sheet. Mostly peaceful, insurrection, right wing supporter, terrorist, debunked.

What the left seem to do in particular is tell you one thing while doing the exact opposite. We may have to redefine the word "unity". Meanwhile JoeBama is writing "executive orders" at a rate never seen before. He's literally behaving like a tinpot dictator...

This cannot end well.
User avatar
weeksy
Site Admin
Posts: 23362
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 5441 times
Been thanked: 13068 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by weeksy »

DEADPOOL wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:04 am
How often do we see the victim of a gangland murder portrayed as a harmless schoolboy only to discover a quick Google reveals pictures of a hardened criminal posing as a gangsta? How is it possible to describe an event as a "mostly peaceful" "protest" when an entire high street has just been smashed, looted and burned to the ground?

Something else you might watch out for is the language. Every single "news" channel will describe an event using the exact same stock phrase. As if they are all preaching from the same hymn sheet. Mostly peaceful, insurrection, right wing supporter, terrorist, debunked.

What the left seem to do in particular is tell you one thing while doing the exact opposite. We may have to redefine the word "unity". Meanwhile JoeBama is writing "executive orders" at a rate never seen before. He's literally behaving like a tinpot dictator...

This cannot end well.
Are you back in your US bashing again ?
JackyJoll
Posts: 3723
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
Has thanked: 261 times
Been thanked: 1261 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by JackyJoll »

weeksy wrote:
Are you back in your US bashing again ?
Maybe it’s one of his biases.
User avatar
MingtheMerciless
Posts: 3543
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:42 am
Location: Scarfolk on Sea
Has thanked: 2929 times
Been thanked: 1877 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by MingtheMerciless »

I think the era of the proper TV journalist is gone, they are now as someone said earlier, media celebrities. The days of hard hitting, accurate journalism seem to be ebbing away, with more 5 minute reads or 2 minute videos. Our local BBC have very one sidedly reported at least 3 or 4 incidents/news items that I only found a more balanced version of later or had direct knowledge of at the time of the incident as I was involved in it.
My old man also relates the story of one of his most important clients having to retire suddenly and mysteriously in the 80’s when he was heading for the pinnacle of his profession. Years later he was talking to a “journalist” in a London pub when his clients name came up and the journalist proudly declared he’d got him as “he was a bender”.
"Of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?"
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
User avatar
Cousin Jack
Posts: 4434
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Location: Down in the Duchy
Has thanked: 2541 times
Been thanked: 2281 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Cousin Jack »

JamJar wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 9:39 am I see people on the left and the right complaining about it being biased which makes me think maybe it isn't.
It is not so much the bias (all media is biased) but the unrelenting dumbing down that annoys me.

They tell you a headline, then they tell you again, then they ask Mrs F'ing Friggins in Frigtown what she thinks about that, then they tell you the same headline again. Detail? Evidence? Data? Don't be silly!

Then of course at least 50% of the content has to be a tale of woe about Covid. FFS we know it kills people, tell us how other countries are managing this shit storm. We might learn a lesson or two.

:angry-cussingblack:
Cornish Tart #1

Remember An Gof!
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13892
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2547 times
Been thanked: 6219 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

MingtheMerciless wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:33 am I think the era of the proper TV journalist is gone, they are now as someone said earlier, media celebrities. The days of hard hitting, accurate journalism seem to be ebbing away, with more 5 minute reads or 2 minute videos. Our local BBC have very one sidedly reported at least 3 or 4 incidents/news items that I only found a more balanced version of later or had direct knowledge of at the time of the incident as I was involved in it.
My old man also relates the story of one of his most important clients having to retire suddenly and mysteriously in the 80’s when he was heading for the pinnacle of his profession. Years later he was talking to a “journalist” in a London pub when his clients name came up and the journalist proudly declared he’d got him as “he was a bender”.
So....err....is that an argument for or against the media being more biased now?
JackyJoll
Posts: 3723
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
Has thanked: 261 times
Been thanked: 1261 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by JackyJoll »

MingtheMerciless wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:33 am I think the era of the proper TV journalist is gone, they are now as someone said earlier, media celebrities. The days of hard hitting, accurate journalism seem to be ebbing away, with more 5 minute reads or 2 minute videos. Our local BBC have very one sidedly reported at least 3 or 4 incidents/news items that I only found a more balanced version of later or had direct knowledge of at the time of the incident as I was involved in it.
My old man also relates the story of one of his most important clients having to retire suddenly and mysteriously in the 80’s when he was heading for the pinnacle of his profession. Years later he was talking to a “journalist” in a London pub when his clients name came up and the journalist proudly declared he’d got him as “he was a bender”.
So you’re saying the era of the proper journalist was gone 35 years ago.
User avatar
Mr Moofo
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:41 pm
Location: Brightonish
Has thanked: 1822 times
Been thanked: 1463 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by Mr Moofo »

JackyJoll wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:42 am
MingtheMerciless wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:33 am I think the era of the proper TV journalist is gone, they are now as someone said earlier, media celebrities. The days of hard hitting, accurate journalism seem to be ebbing away, with more 5 minute reads or 2 minute videos. Our local BBC have very one sidedly reported at least 3 or 4 incidents/news items that I only found a more balanced version of later or had direct knowledge of at the time of the incident as I was involved in it.
My old man also relates the story of one of his most important clients having to retire suddenly and mysteriously in the 80’s when he was heading for the pinnacle of his profession. Years later he was talking to a “journalist” in a London pub when his clients name came up and the journalist proudly declared he’d got him as “he was a bender”.
So you’re saying the era of the proper journalist was gone 35 years ago.
I am guessing there have been a few since them - such as Marie Colvin, Frank Gardiner but they are becoming few and far between. Let's face it, Kaye Burley is the tab end of tittle tattle journalism - Laura K is openly all about herself etc...
It is just another way of becoming a celeb - in reality they are all just jumped up weather girls and clothes horses
User avatar
DEADPOOL
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:13 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re: Uk Media

Post by DEADPOOL »

weeksy wrote:
Are you back in your US bashing again ?
Nope. The whole world has gone mad. I am the only sane person here so far as I can tell.

Remember some time ago I was suggesting the big tech companies were becoming such a massive influence that it was becoming dangerous. You yourself were saying "yeah but how does that affect us here?" well, now you see the result.

The entire world media either have to parrot whatever woke, sycophantic, left wing Newspeak nonsense big tech declare as "truth" or be called domestic terrorist, white supremicist, racist bigots. There is no middle ground. Either you are for the media or you are against it.

If big tech don't like what you are saying, they will destroy you.
Last edited by DEADPOOL on Wed Jan 27, 2021 11:33 am, edited 2 times in total.