Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
-
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1722 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 907 times
- Been thanked: 1001 times
-
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 836 times
- Been thanked: 1239 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Claiming 2 injections means fully vaccinated against covid seems a little optimistic.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23422
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5451 times
- Been thanked: 13087 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
That's never been the plan here, so is at this stage not important IMO.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
-
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:30 am
- Has thanked: 164 times
- Been thanked: 308 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
It's not like everyone is 'fully vaccinated' with 2 jabs, although obviously the recommendation is for 2 jabs to give best, long-lasting, effect.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
If the first jab means those who've had it are not going to go to hospital and/or die it seems rather splitting hairs to judge on 2 jabs given at this point, seeing as the plan is to not have provided 2 jabs to most at this stage.
- Yambo
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:08 pm
- Location: Self Isolating
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 1647 times
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
It has always been the strategy in the UK to concentrate on delivering first vaccinations with an extended time to delivering second vaccinations. This is because the first vaccinations virtually eliminate serious infections leading to hospitalisation, thereby protecting NHS hospitals and preventing them from being overwhelmed.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
https://i.redd.it/97ekns4olbg61.png
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
If you believe that second (aka booster) vaccinations should be provided instead of providing first vaccinations perhaps you would be kind enough to indicate why you believe that should be the case?
Thanks.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
-
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1722 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Nope, I'm just pointing out that we have a fair way to go. We currently seem to have a few politicians briefing the press off the record about pubs opening and it all being over soon.irie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:24 pmIt has always been the strategy in the UK to concentrate on delivering first vaccinations with an extended time to delivering second vaccinations. This is because the first vaccinations virtually eliminate serious infections leading to hospitalisation, thereby protecting NHS hospitals and preventing them from being overwhelmed.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
https://i.redd.it/97ekns4olbg61.png
Thats not to say that the vaccine rollout isn't going well mind, it seems to be proceeding at a fair pace and that data is a few days old but the jobs not done til its finished.
If you believe that second (aka booster) vaccinations should be provided instead of providing first vaccinations perhaps you would be kind enough to indicate why you believe that should be the case?
Thanks.
We've heard that a few times now and the UKs record of covid related deaths doesn't look at all good.
To me its just worth keeping an eye on.
You ok with that?
-
- Posts: 1837
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:38 pm
- Location: North East Essex
- Has thanked: 565 times
- Been thanked: 754 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I think you could honestly claim to be fully vaccinated if you have had the complete treatment recommended by the vaccine producers. Of course, you won't be fully immunised but that's a different kettle of fish.Kneerly Down wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 6:49 pmIt's not like everyone is 'fully vaccinated' with 2 jabs, although obviously the recommendation is for 2 jabs to give best, long-lasting, effect.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:34 am Before we get to slapping everyone on the back about the vaccine rollout this graph shows the percentage of the populations who are fully vaccinated, as in both shots.
If the first jab means those who've had it are not going to go to hospital and/or die it seems rather splitting hairs to judge on 2 jabs given at this point, seeing as the plan is to not have provided 2 jabs to most at this stage.
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Perfectly OK with that.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 7:38 pm To me its just worth keeping an eye on.
You ok with that?
I would have thought that it was self evident that if ~15m have had their first vaccinations and ~0.5m have had their second vaccinations that would leave ~14.5m requiring second vaccinations, which is some way to go.
We'll trust you to keep an eye on it.
Thanks.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Increasing the interval between doses from 6 to 12 weeks significantly improves immune response.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 3/fulltext
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 3/fulltext
Background
The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine has been approved for emergency use by the UK regulatory authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, with a regimen of two standard doses given with an interval of 4–12 weeks. The planned roll-out in the UK will involve vaccinating people in high-risk categories with their first dose immediately, and delivering the second dose 12 weeks later. Here, we provide both a further prespecified pooled analysis of trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and exploratory analyses of the impact on immunogenicity and efficacy of extending the interval between priming and booster doses. In addition, we show the immunogenicity and protection afforded by the first dose, before a booster dose has been offered.
Edit: significantlyFindings
Between April 23 and Dec 6, 2020, 24 422 participants were recruited and vaccinated across the four studies, of whom 17 178 were included in the primary analysis (8597 receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 8581 receiving control vaccine). The data cutoff for these analyses was Dec 7, 2020. 332 NAAT-positive infections met the primary endpoint of symptomatic infection more than 14 days after the second dose. Overall vaccine efficacy more than 14 days after the second dose was 66·7% (95% CI 57·4–74·0), with 84 (1·0%) cases in the 8597 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 248 (2·9%) in the 8581 participants in the control group. There were no hospital admissions for COVID-19 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group after the initial 21-day exclusion period, and 15 in the control group. 108 (0·9%) of 12 282 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 127 (1·1%) of 11 962 participants in the control group had serious adverse events. There were seven deaths considered unrelated to vaccination (two in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 group and five in the control group), including one COVID-19-related death in one participant in the control group. Exploratory analyses showed that vaccine efficacy after a single standard dose of vaccine from day 22 to day 90 after vaccination was 76·0% (59·3–85·9). Our modelling analysis indicated that protection did not wane during this initial 3-month period. Similarly, antibody levels were maintained during this period with minimal waning by day 90 (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·59–0·74]). In the participants who received two standard doses, after the second dose, efficacy was higher in those with a longer prime-boost interval (vaccine efficacy 81·3% [95% CI 60·3–91·2] at ≥12 weeks) than in those with a short interval (vaccine efficacy 55·1% [33·0–69·9] at <6 weeks). These observations are supported by immunogenicity data that showed binding antibody responses more than two-fold higher after an interval of 12 or more weeks compared with an interval of less than 6 weeks in those who were aged 18–55 years (GMR 2·32 [2·01–2·68]).
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Now Germany, with it's appalling vaccination record, is trying to backtrack on what it earlier said about the Astrazeneca vaccine. But too late, they've shot themselves in the foot and the damage is done.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heal ... SKBN2AM0YA
Good luck with that.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heal ... SKBN2AM0YA
So rather than having an available and effective vaccine and perhaps a headache and some shivers or fever ...The German government is reworking its strategy to vaccinate the nation against COVID-19 as its campaign, which has faltered due to a lack of supply, also faces public resistance to the shot from AstraZeneca Plc.
... they'd rather risk contracting Covid-19.Anecdotal reports that the AstraZeneca vaccine causes stronger side effects than other vaccines have been confirmed by Germany’s top vaccines agency, the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
It found that nearly a quarter of people receiving the AstraZeneca shot experienced flu-like symptoms, and around 15% experienced shivers or fever - more than side effects reported from the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.
Good luck with that.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4496
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2261 times
- Been thanked: 2192 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I'd be quite happy to camp outside the vaccine centre and wait for my turn (like those bellends do when they're after the new model iPhone). These vaccine-sceptics should just pipe down - nobody's forcing you and nobody wants to hear your effing chin-music.
My sister-in-law (60s) told me she's not having any vaccine - she can avoid getting covids by 'positive thinking' apparently. She's allowed an opinion. I know that because she told me twice, including when I initially didn't ask her at all if she was having a vaccine. She also sends 'prayers' on Facebook a lot, if this adds to the evidence of her analytical thinking.
My sister-in-law (60s) told me she's not having any vaccine - she can avoid getting covids by 'positive thinking' apparently. She's allowed an opinion. I know that because she told me twice, including when I initially didn't ask her at all if she was having a vaccine. She also sends 'prayers' on Facebook a lot, if this adds to the evidence of her analytical thinking.
-
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:51 am
- Been thanked: 2617 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I had the AstraZeneca jab on Saturday, last thing as there was one spare at the end of the day. As the other hero workers had had theirs I got this one.
Saturday night and most of Sunday through to early Monday morning saw me with flu like symptoms, and half awake hallucinations. By the time I got up at about half six on Monday I was back to was passes for normal.
The local health board is, AFAIK, leading the UK in the percentage vaccinated stakes, which is both nice, and a surprise. Usually they aren't that efficient at logistics.
Saturday night and most of Sunday through to early Monday morning saw me with flu like symptoms, and half awake hallucinations. By the time I got up at about half six on Monday I was back to was passes for normal.
The local health board is, AFAIK, leading the UK in the percentage vaccinated stakes, which is both nice, and a surprise. Usually they aren't that efficient at logistics.
- Noggin
- Posts: 8019
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 16210 times
- Been thanked: 3926 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
My SiL had the Pfizer one and was fine
My Bro got the AZ one yesterday and is currently down with man-covid!! LOL He has said that if the reaction to the vaccine is this bad he's bloody gla he's had it and won't get the real thing! LOL
My Bro got the AZ one yesterday and is currently down with man-covid!! LOL He has said that if the reaction to the vaccine is this bad he's bloody gla he's had it and won't get the real thing! LOL
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
- Horse
- Posts: 11557
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6193 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I had Pfizer and was Pfine.
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 836 times
- Been thanked: 1239 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Maybe they aren't that efficient at counting.cheb wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:57 pm I had the AstraZeneca jab on Saturday, last thing as there was one spare at the end of the day. As the other hero workers had had theirs I got this one.
Saturday night and most of Sunday through to early Monday morning saw me with flu like symptoms, and half awake hallucinations. By the time I got up at about half six on Monday I was back to was passes for normal.
The local health board is, AFAIK, leading the UK in the percentage vaccinated stakes, which is both nice, and a surprise. Usually they aren't that efficient at logistics.
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Mrs irie gets another AZ jab tomorrow because it seems that for some reason her first AZ jab in January in a hospital wasn't recorded in the NHS database. Then I guess that in 12 weeks from tomorrow she'll get a supposedly second but actually third jab. Who knows wtf she'll end up like after three jabs!
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- Skub
- Posts: 12167
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 9829 times
- Been thanked: 10145 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Me too,aside from a tender arm the day after. No biggie.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955