Re: Post Office scandal
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:08 pm
I wouldn't hand back my CBE's, those spots make my Mk2 Escort look proper cool.
Motorbikes, Sportsbikes, Adventure bike, Supermotos, banter, chat, friends and whatever else you can imagine. KTM, Ducati, Aprilia, Suzuki, Yamaha, BMW, Moto Guzzi, Laverda
https://revtothelimit.co.uk/
This.Mussels wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:47 pm If the government use a bill to pardon them all it risks setting a precedent that a government could abuse in the future
Count Steer wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:53 am The thing that gets me is that this has been known about for years. Private Eye (as mentioned above) have been reporting on it for ages and, judging by the letters to it, lots of politicians read it or are briefed on the content.
Now there's a flurry of words and suggestions coming out of Westminster because there's been a TV drama about it. (Brilliant choice by ITVif it had been a 'worthy investigative' programme it wouldn't have had half the impact).
So, what would have been happening if ITV hadn't blown the bladdy doors off? The scandal is that they knew and did bugger all.
NoMr Moofo wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:08 am The true shame is that it has taken a TV series to actually force the government into action - when all knew the issue. But until last week it was low level chatter and not high on the agenda.
It goes to show just how plastic all our lead politicians are - and how they have no intention or standing for right or wrong.
Private Eye, plus many others have been trying to highlight with little success.
Are labour going to be any better than this superficial bunch of narcissists ?
If evidence about missing money, from the software that counted the money is/was not credible, what prosecution evidence is left, in each case?Mr. Dazzle wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:48 amThis.Mussels wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:47 pm If the government use a bill to pardon them all it risks setting a precedent that a government could abuse in the future
Allowing the government to blanket pardon a group of people because of popular opinion doesn't really fit in with a "rule of law" society, however worthy the case seems to be.
Hell of a good time to be an actually dodgy Postmaster too eh?![]()
It is a sad state of affairs when that ironic post rings true ....Supermofo wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:06 amCount Steer wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:53 am The thing that gets me is that this has been known about for years. Private Eye (as mentioned above) have been reporting on it for ages and, judging by the letters to it, lots of politicians read it or are briefed on the content.
Now there's a flurry of words and suggestions coming out of Westminster because there's been a TV drama about it. (Brilliant choice by ITVif it had been a 'worthy investigative' programme it wouldn't have had half the impact).
So, what would have been happening if ITV hadn't blown the bladdy doors off? The scandal is that they knew and did bugger all.
According to Hislop there other day, Boris threw an incredible strop about the way he was played in the Partygate TV programme.Mr. Dazzle wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:03 am Making a TV drama about a bunch of people who were wrongly convicted is easy and an easy win. Who's gonna disagree with the protagonist?
Can't really say the same about the much more nuanced Climate Change, Inflation, Covid etc. can you?
I’ve got an idea for a movie- the World powers revive Ted Heath from his cryogenic torpor, to cut inflation at a stroke!Mr. Dazzle wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:03 am Making a TV drama about a bunch of people who were wrongly convicted is easy and an easy win. Who's gonna disagree with the protagonist?
Can't really say the same about the much more nuanced Climate Change, Inflation, Covid etc. can you?
I've seen work like that and it doesn't surprise me, what does is the PO didn't check. I don't think I've ever had a client (similar size companies) not thoroughly audit anything reporting money values.Tarmacsurfer wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:28 am As a software engineer I found the below article very interesting.
"Whoever wrote this code clearly has no understanding of elementary mathematics or the most basic rules of programming."
https://www.postofficescandal.uk/post/i ... h-barrels/
The guy doesn't pull his punches.
Probs an unpatched windows 7 machine knowing the Gov, connected to server 2008...mangocrazy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:38 pm On a more nerd-ish tangent, does anyone know what operating system/platform the Horizon boxes that were supplied to all sub-postmasters ran? Was it a standard Unix or Windows box, or was it entirely Fujitsu proprietary hardware/software?
In the early 2000s they'd have probably still have been running Win 95/98. Or even (the horror) 3.11...Greenman wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:59 pmProbs an unpatched windows 7 machine knowing the Gov, connected to server 2008...mangocrazy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:38 pm On a more nerd-ish tangent, does anyone know what operating system/platform the Horizon boxes that were supplied to all sub-postmasters ran? Was it a standard Unix or Windows box, or was it entirely Fujitsu proprietary hardware/software?![]()
I was in a council corporate building last week and most people were still on windows 7!