Re: Foot Position on Pegs
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:03 pm
Balls of feet here, can't remember ever riding another way... & that includes bikes with rearsets.
Motorbikes, Sportsbikes, Adventure bike, Supermotos, banter, chat, friends and whatever else you can imagine. KTM, Ducati, Aprilia, Suzuki, Yamaha, BMW, Moto Guzzi, Laverda
https://revtothelimit.co.uk/
I've never been able to put my feet on the ground when stopping. Tip of toes on one side generally!! LOL The Monster is the first bike I've EVER been able to put both feet flat on the ground!! The fact that I also have bent knees is just weird!!Horse wrote: Mon Nov 21, 2022 12:13 pmThey reach the ground, that's just about enough. 29" FWIW
If you have your legs straight from seat to pegs - you must have some bend at the knee - how do you put your feet down when stopping?![]()
So you must have your knees bent even more when up on the footrests? So you should be able to slightly raise yourself off the seat, e.g. when riding over speedbumps.Noggin wrote: Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:25 pm The Monster is the first bike I've EVER been able to put both feet flat on the ground!! The fact that I also have bent knees is just weird!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Just a smidge!!! LOL But only on the Monster!Horse wrote: Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:43 pmSo you must have your knees bent even more when up on the footrests? So you should be able to slightly raise yourself off the seat, e.g. when riding over speedbumps.Noggin wrote: Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:25 pm The Monster is the first bike I've EVER been able to put both feet flat on the ground!! The fact that I also have bent knees is just weird!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup, like I said, the RT riding position is more towards ADV than sportsNoggin wrote: Mon Nov 21, 2022 5:06 pm Thinking about it, if I try and stand too much, I can't reach the throttle cos of lack of right arm mobility!! And I doubt, at the moment, I could stand up to straight legged from that much 'bent' knee!![]()
That’s not an IAM Roadsmart rule — no such IAM rule exists.
A trainee asked me "what qualifications do you have to do this?"Hot_Air wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:19 pm that’s the downside of amateur Observers as opposed to professional Instructors.
Hot_Air wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:19 pmThat’s not an IAM Roadsmart rule — no such IAM rule exists.
It might have been your Observer’s rule of thumb, but that’s the downside of amateur Observers as opposed to professional Instructors.
Those speed-to-gear ratios are meaningless. It depends on the circumstances, your bike, etc.
Thing is that's so bike dependant. On the GSXS I could do all those speeds in 1st or 4th with no issue. On my Firestorm it was a pig below 40 mph with esp 20, 30, 40 all falling between gears and getting it even slightly out meant it'd chug like a muddafudda. Doing 40 in 4th on my old SMC would probably have broken it! Suggesting one size fits all gearing suggests he was a bit inflexible which would put me off.Trinity765 wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:57 amHot_Air wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:19 pmThat’s not an IAM Roadsmart rule — no such IAM rule exists.
It might have been your Observer’s rule of thumb, but that’s the downside of amateur Observers as opposed to professional Instructors.
Those speed-to-gear ratios are meaningless. It depends on the circumstances, your bike, etc.
It was the chief observer (not sure of his actual title, but the most qualified in my branch) on my pre-test that said that and I was on a CB10000R at the time so it seemed ridiculous, but I did it anyway. I've had advanced training with many professionals outside of the IAM, once a year at least to make sure I'm not getting sloppy.
I agree. This was to do with riding economically and had nothing to do with riding safely or having optimal control by being in the right gear at the right time to get out of trouble.Supermofo wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 9:29 amThing is that's so bike dependant. On the GSXS I could do all those speeds in 1st or 4th with no issue. On my Firestorm it was a pig below 40 mph with esp 20, 30, 40 all falling between gears and getting it even slightly out meant it'd chug like a muddafudda. Doing 40 in 4th on my old SMC would probably have broken it! Suggesting one size fits all gearing suggests he was a bit inflexible which would put me off.Trinity765 wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:57 amHot_Air wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:19 pm
That’s not an IAM Roadsmart rule — no such IAM rule exists.
It might have been your Observer’s rule of thumb, but that’s the downside of amateur Observers as opposed to professional Instructors.
Those speed-to-gear ratios are meaningless. It depends on the circumstances, your bike, etc.
It was the chief observer (not sure of his actual title, but the most qualified in my branch) on my pre-test that said that and I was on a CB10000R at the time so it seemed ridiculous, but I did it anyway. I've had advanced training with many professionals outside of the IAM, once a year at least to make sure I'm not getting sloppy.
Reminds me of an article MCN did years ago where they got police riders on road and track talking about their riding and best practice. For the road section the assessment was that they were all pretty bloody damn good as expected. On the track part they had national/international bike racers I seem to recall assessing them. The overriding feedback was that the police riders were all riding a certain way (not surprising) which wasn't best on track mainly to do with body position and the impact of that on the bike. Most of the coppers listened to the feedback and tried to adapt but one pretty much refused to believe that their way wasn't the best way even when the benefits were explained. Not sure that's healthy.
I think that's what's put me off IAM type stuff, it's all a bit cult like by the book. I'm all for improving your riding and taking advice but the ridged by the book riding can be blinkered at times IMO from what I've heard/seen. I could be wrong.
If it means that the motor isn't running effectively and efficiently, it will adversely affect fuel consumption.mangocrazy wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:11 amThe '2nd gear in a 20 limit, 3rd in a 30 and 4th in a 40' thing sounds like a direct lift from learner driver car training and totally inapplicable to motorbikes.
About 10 years ago I was assigned 2 top cop riders to help and evaluate at Donington.Supermofo wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 9:29 am
Reminds me of an article MCN did years ago where they got police riders on road and track talking about their riding and best practice. For the road section the assessment was that they were all pretty bloody damn good as expected. On the track part they had national/international bike racers I seem to recall assessing them. The overriding feedback was that the police riders were all riding a certain way (not surprising) which wasn't best on track mainly to do with body position and the impact of that on the bike. Most of the coppers listened to the feedback and tried to adapt but one pretty much refused to believe that their way wasn't the best way even when the benefits were explained. Not sure that's healthy.
A police response rider in a social setting told me that he did not agree that they are not allowed to change their body position.Yorick wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:25 amAbout 10 years ago I was assigned 2 top cop riders to help and evaluate at Donington.Supermofo wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 9:29 am
Reminds me of an article MCN did years ago where they got police riders on road and track talking about their riding and best practice. For the road section the assessment was that they were all pretty bloody damn good as expected. On the track part they had national/international bike racers I seem to recall assessing them. The overriding feedback was that the police riders were all riding a certain way (not surprising) which wasn't best on track mainly to do with body position and the impact of that on the bike. Most of the coppers listened to the feedback and tried to adapt but one pretty much refused to believe that their way wasn't the best way even when the benefits were explained. Not sure that's healthy.
They were so stubborn and insisted that they knew best. Even other instructors tried, but no.
So in next session I sat alongside them in holding bay. Let them go ahead and passed them down Hollywood at probably double their speed. My vids show me at 140 there.
I lapped them within 3 laps.
Gave them a long knowing smile afterwards ;(
These 2 sat bolt upright all day, while I was hanging off like loonTrinity765 wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:48 amA police response rider in a social setting told me that he did not agree that they are not allowed to change their body position.Yorick wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:25 amAbout 10 years ago I was assigned 2 top cop riders to help and evaluate at Donington.Supermofo wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 9:29 am
Reminds me of an article MCN did years ago where they got police riders on road and track talking about their riding and best practice. For the road section the assessment was that they were all pretty bloody damn good as expected. On the track part they had national/international bike racers I seem to recall assessing them. The overriding feedback was that the police riders were all riding a certain way (not surprising) which wasn't best on track mainly to do with body position and the impact of that on the bike. Most of the coppers listened to the feedback and tried to adapt but one pretty much refused to believe that their way wasn't the best way even when the benefits were explained. Not sure that's healthy.
They were so stubborn and insisted that they knew best. Even other instructors tried, but no.
So in next session I sat alongside them in holding bay. Let them go ahead and passed them down Hollywood at probably double their speed. My vids show me at 140 there.
I lapped them within 3 laps.
Gave them a long knowing smile afterwards ;(
I use it when the speedo sensor of the guzzi breaks yet again*2nd gear in a 20 limit, 3rd in a 30 and 4th in a 40
Trinity765 wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:57 am It was the chief observer (not sure of his actual title, but the most qualified in my branch) on my pre-test that said that and I was on a CB10000R at the time so it seemed ridiculous, but I did it anyway. I've had advanced training with many professionals outside of the IAM, once a year at least to make sure I'm not getting sloppy.
Yep.mangocrazy wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:11 am I wonder if there is anyone on this forum who has ever bought a bike with the intention of riding 'economically' as the main reason for purchase?