Why is it always the unions that are the butt of all the complaints about the railways? All they do is try and keep the bloody things running. The problem lies with the people tasked to manage the railways and (not coincidentally) the short-sighted decision to privatise the railways. You know, the ones paying themselves eye-watering salaries and bonuses for presiding over decay. That and the dividends that these privatised companies pay to shareholders. The management level seemingly have no interest in trying to make railways more attractive and relevant to the general public, all they're concerned about are their bloated salaries.Mussels wrote: ↑Thu Dec 15, 2022 12:25 pmSecond to taxis they are the most expensive way of travelling I know of, it's about time they were modernised but the unions don't want anything that will reduce their subscriptions.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Thu Dec 15, 2022 11:54 am The state.
To be fair, trains are/should be a big part of the government's climate change targets. They're hugely more efficient and cleaner that nearly all other popular forms of (powered) transport and for that reason alone I'm not averse to funding them.
They are also painfully slow, crowded and unreliable.
As an example, on the (admittedly infrequent) occasions I visit the NEC for the Bike show, I always, always use the train. It is just so superior to any other means of travelling to the show that there is no competition. I don't have to deal with the traffic in and around the NEC, don't have to pay parking fees and (if I unaccountably chose to use the bike) I don't have to endure November weather and walking around all day in bike gear.