TRE is a wire cut and 15k resistor. Just means that the ecu thinks the bike is in 6th gear and doesn't retard the timing.Skub wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:50 pm A friend had a 98 model which was restricted,I had 98 ZX9R C1 and the TL was very noticeably slower,he bought it new and we all thought there was something wrong with it. Fitting a TRE to his bike made all the difference and brought it closer to the Kawasaki's performance.
Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2556 times
- Been thanked: 4167 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
The (full fat) engine made more power and torque than Ducati's 916 and the handling quirks were fixable. Brakes were on par for the time and the TL was significantly lighter than the 916.weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:40 am As well as that, the TL1000 was shite 20 years ago, it's not got any better
Not sure how that translates to a shite bike.
Have you actually ridden one?
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 26934
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 6125 times
- Been thanked: 15493 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Yes. Several. It was shit. I also worked on one with a wanky shock thing, that was shit too.mangocrazy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 6:17 pmThe (full fat) engine made more power and torque than Ducati's 916 and the handling quirks were fixable. Brakes were on par for the time and the TL was significantly lighter than the 916.weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:40 am As well as that, the TL1000 was shite 20 years ago, it's not got any better
Not sure how that translates to a shite bike.
Have you actually ridden one?
The only redeeming feature of riding a TL1000 was the fact I could give it back.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 26934
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 6125 times
- Been thanked: 15493 times
- Noggin
- Posts: 10115
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 19576 times
- Been thanked: 4950 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
It doesn't help your argument
Also depends on the year, the 97 ones were better
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!! 
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2556 times
- Been thanked: 4167 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
It would be helpful if you could qualify 'shit'. I owned one for about 3 years, and yes it had its flaws. The rear shock was shit (which I've already admitted), the forks were also harsh in their action and the standard tyre and rim combination was rubbish. But all those things were relatively easily fixed and once done it was transformed.weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 6:44 pm Yes. Several. It was shit. I also worked on one with a wanky shock thing, that was shit too.
The only redeeming feature of riding a TL1000 was the fact I could give it back.
But the motor was absolutely stonking - it was as fast as my Ducati 888 SP3 which had a Corsa spec, big valve blah de blah John Hackett motor, but had better torque. It was immense. It made mincemeat of my mate's ZXR750. It was the only bike I've ever owned where I was laying darkies on a track day (a mate riding behind me verified this).
Today if I was to ride one it would almost inevitably be a disappointment. But 25 years ago a sorted TLS was the dog's bollocks.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 26934
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 6125 times
- Been thanked: 15493 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
I didn't ride one that had been transformed, I rode a stock one, well 2 different stock ones
I'm not sure how much clearer I can be, it was awful. Fuelling, handling, center of balance, riding position, just, well, all of it.
I'm not sure how much clearer I can be, it was awful. Fuelling, handling, center of balance, riding position, just, well, all of it.
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 17503
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 627 times
- Been thanked: 9495 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Yeah, but you like KTM's, so your opinion can't really be trusted :pweeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:25 pm I didn't ride one that had been transformed, I rode a stock one, well 2 different stock ones
I'm not sure how much clearer I can be, it was awful. Fuelling, handling, center of balance, riding position, just, well, all of it.
-
Sadlonelygit
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:10 pm
- Has thanked: 94 times
- Been thanked: 796 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Your biggest issue will be that the vendors idea of vgc and your idea will be quite different.
So far this year I have looked at 3 bikes and 9 cars, all of which have been 'nickel' and 'excellente'
None have made it back to chez moi, and I have owned bikes that certain members on here have compared to an anchor (no, I didn't mishear them!)
My 'limited' experience with the TL found the damper was a knee jerk litigation plaster, when the issue was more to do with chain tension. Too tight and they pitched onto their nose and started an oscillation that could cause a lack of control and the legend of a widowmaker.
So far this year I have looked at 3 bikes and 9 cars, all of which have been 'nickel' and 'excellente'
None have made it back to chez moi, and I have owned bikes that certain members on here have compared to an anchor (no, I didn't mishear them!)
My 'limited' experience with the TL found the damper was a knee jerk litigation plaster, when the issue was more to do with chain tension. Too tight and they pitched onto their nose and started an oscillation that could cause a lack of control and the legend of a widowmaker.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2556 times
- Been thanked: 4167 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
OK, we obviously rode two very different bikes. This was mine:weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:25 pm I didn't ride one that had been transformed, I rode a stock one, well 2 different stock ones
I'm not sure how much clearer I can be, it was awful. Fuelling, handling, center of balance, riding position, just, well, all of it.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Doccas had a bitubo rear shock and a washer to raise the rear too.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2556 times
- Been thanked: 4167 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
So not exactly a stocker, then.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 26934
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 6125 times
- Been thanked: 15493 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Only when me and Crust had fitted it. Which was after I last rode it
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Not that different.
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Now what I want to know is why I remember that. Has zero use for me as an important thing to remember, yet there it has stuck.weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:37 pmOnly when me and Crust had fitted it. Which was after I last rode it
- Noggin
- Posts: 10115
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 19576 times
- Been thanked: 4950 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
I knowSadlonelygit wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:29 pm Your biggest issue will be that the vendors idea of vgc and your idea will be quite different.
So far this year I have looked at 3 bikes and 9 cars, all of which have been 'nickel' and 'excellente'
None have made it back to chez moi, and I have owned bikes that certain members on here have compared to an anchor (no, I didn't mishear them!)
My 'limited' experience with the TL found the damper was a knee jerk litigation plaster, when the issue was more to do with chain tension. Too tight and they pitched onto their nose and started an oscillation that could cause a lack of control and the legend of a widowmaker.
I still think the biggest issue with the TL was the way people accelerated on it - it didn't handle like a big IL4, but people got on and rode it like one. Different animal altogether! But, the chain thing could help with that too. I guess there were issues (chain, rotary damper etc) and not being smooth would exacerbate ?
But, it's not red????!!mangocrazy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:30 pmOK, we obviously rode two very different bikes. This was mine:weeksy wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:25 pm I didn't ride one that had been transformed, I rode a stock one, well 2 different stock ones
I'm not sure how much clearer I can be, it was awful. Fuelling, handling, center of balance, riding position, just, well, all of it.
Tl3.jpg
Before,


After

Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!! 
-
Supermofo
- Posts: 5966
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 5954 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
I only rode one TL I think probably a 2000 model. I had a 96 Fireblade at the time. The engine was great but first corner I shit myself as the same effort required to get the blade on its ear barely registered and it took a big old heave to get round the bends. Conversely the TL owner at the first set of lights, before I said anything, said the Blade was like riding a knife edge.
His had the damper fitted and maybe it was that, but the handling was like treacle.
Didn't stop my mate being faster than me so obviously didn't limit him but I reckon he'd have been quicker still on the Blade. I'm guessing it helped owning it and getting used to it.
Wasn't just me either that found it handled odd. In Spain on the mountains my little bro rode the TL whilst I followed on my Dad's VFR8. The TL would pull on every straight and I'd reel him in on every bend.
But having said that. I'd still like to own one. They look/sound fucking awesome. My first experience of a TL was when they first come out. My TZR 250 had seized and I was waiting for the AA at the side of the road. In the distance there was the sound of approaching thunder and a TL appeared from the roundabout up the slip road at warp speed. Made a real impression.
My mates one was maroon red, looked lovely and sounded incredible
His had the damper fitted and maybe it was that, but the handling was like treacle.
Didn't stop my mate being faster than me so obviously didn't limit him but I reckon he'd have been quicker still on the Blade. I'm guessing it helped owning it and getting used to it.
Wasn't just me either that found it handled odd. In Spain on the mountains my little bro rode the TL whilst I followed on my Dad's VFR8. The TL would pull on every straight and I'd reel him in on every bend.
But having said that. I'd still like to own one. They look/sound fucking awesome. My first experience of a TL was when they first come out. My TZR 250 had seized and I was waiting for the AA at the side of the road. In the distance there was the sound of approaching thunder and a TL appeared from the roundabout up the slip road at warp speed. Made a real impression.
My mates one was maroon red, looked lovely and sounded incredible
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 8855
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2556 times
- Been thanked: 4167 times
Re: Suzuki TL1000s - specs, questions!
Mine was also blessed with a complete custom exhaust system with oval Titanium cans which made it sound incredible and even quicker than stock. The handling was sorted with the Ohlins shock and the steering sharpened up with the smaller rim (5.5") and taller tyre (180/55). I seem to remember I dropped thr forks through the yokes to sharpen the steering up as well.
And after riding the bike home with the Suzuki damper fitted, I took it straght off and left it off.
And after riding the bike home with the Suzuki damper fitted, I took it straght off and left it off.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
