Page 2 of 3
Re: NW200
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 7:55 pm
by wull
They’re dropping out like flies, I give up. Obviously whilst out they’re thinking “fuck that” and are coming in.
Re: NW200
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 8:02 pm
by Skub
Those roads are slippery as fook when wet. Years of traffic shit floating to the surface. Rather them than me.
Re: NW200
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 8:21 pm
by Dodgy69
That Davy Todd's come on a bit. Proper big balls racing. Ace stuff.

Re: NW200
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 8:42 pm
by wull
Tbf he’s been at the sharp end for a good few years albeit no racing since Covid struck.
Re: NW200
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 9:03 pm
by Dodgy69
A few not happy about supertwins not running. Think the organisers were happy with two cracking races and no nasties.

Re: NW200
Posted: Sat May 14, 2022 7:22 pm
by KungFooBob
Re: NW200
Posted: Sat May 14, 2022 8:32 pm
by Lutin
No wonder Dunlop didn't want anyone else out on their tyres in the last superbike race.
Re: NW200
Posted: Sat May 14, 2022 8:53 pm
by weeksy
Holy fuck!
Re: NW200
Posted: Sat May 14, 2022 9:35 pm
by wull
Plenty life left in that

Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 8:28 am
by wull
Not sure if it’s bullshit or not but apparently Hicky was driving the M3 under the influence and will be back for a court appearance. Not entirely sure how accurate that is, will have to wait and see.
That would mean FHO’s statement was just a cover story.
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 10:14 am
by singlesman
Hope Dunlop get the tyre issue sorted with the TT just around the corner, but has anyone ever seen tyres delaminating as badly as that?
That’s surely going to be playing mind games with some riders on a course as unforgiving as the IOM.
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 10:28 am
by weeksy
singlesman wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 10:14 am
Hope Dunlop get the tyre issue sorted with the TT just around the corner, but has anyone ever seen tyres delaminating as badly as that?
That’s surely going to be playing mind games with some riders on a course as unforgiving as the IOM.
I wouldn't be running them there. I wouldn't care what the contract says, either proper tyres or I go home. Simple
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 11:26 am
by Dodgy69
Those cheap tyre warmers not working proper.

Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
by wull
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 12:22 pm
by weeksy
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
Who's to say? That's what Dunlop obviously will say. But would you want to find out at 180mph at the TT?
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 12:27 pm
by singlesman
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
I would think almost certainly, might still take some time for certain riders to fully regain confidence in the new batch!
Not that I would presume for a second to understand the mindset and thought process of these motorcycle riding super heroes.
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 1:16 pm
by wull
weeksy wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 12:22 pm
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
Who's to say? That's what Dunlop obviously will say. But would you want to find out at 180mph at the TT?
Well my thinking is these tyres are tested extensively to deal with all types of scenarios and probably coped as they should. But a bad batch will fail no matter what, so chances are it’s simply a bad batch.
I can understand having to regain confidence in them again but there’s no way Dunlop make shit tyres.
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 1:18 pm
by weeksy
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 1:16 pm
weeksy wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 12:22 pm
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
Who's to say? That's what Dunlop obviously will say. But would you want to find out at 180mph at the TT?
Well my thinking is these tyres are tested extensively to deal with all types of scenarios and probably coped as they should. But a bad batch will fail no matter what, so chances are it’s simply a bad batch.
I can understand having to regain confidence in them again but there’s no way Dunlop make shit tyres.
They sure did for this weekend. I like a Dunlop, but I'm fairly confident their road rubber will work. I wouldn't want to be the one testing those slicks!
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 4:45 pm
by Noggin
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 1:16 pm
weeksy wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 12:22 pm
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 11:54 am
Was it not a bad batch? As oppose to design?
Who's to say? That's what Dunlop obviously will say. But would you want to find out at 180mph at the TT?
Well my thinking is these tyres are tested extensively to deal with all types of scenarios and probably coped as they should. But a bad batch will fail no matter what, so chances are it’s simply a bad batch.
I can understand having to regain confidence in them again but there’s no way Dunlop make shit tyres.
From what I read, it was a number of different tyres - two classes and fronts and rears. Does that still class as 'a batch'?
Re: NW200
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 5:01 pm
by wull
Noggin wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 4:45 pm
wull wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 1:16 pm
weeksy wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 12:22 pm
Who's to say? That's what Dunlop obviously will say. But would you want to find out at 180mph at the TT?
Well my thinking is these tyres are tested extensively to deal with all types of scenarios and probably coped as they should. But a bad batch will fail no matter what, so chances are it’s simply a bad batch.
I can understand having to regain confidence in them again but there’s no way Dunlop make shit tyres.
From what I read, it was a number of different tyres - two classes and fronts and rears. Does that still class as 'a batch'?
It could do.