wheelnut wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:21 am
The media will do what it's always done. You'll have pro-republic and pro-democrat stances. It does seem to be a little more polarised in recent years, and the rise of unchecked internet news feeds hasn't helped, but the choice of your information feeds can depend on your political stance. It does seem to have got more personal lately, and got worse with the Trump/Clinton campaign. Rep or Dem, The Trump/Clinton campaign managed to bring US politics in to the gutter.
Firstly, I'm not sure the stated mission was to protect the people of Afghanistan. Secondly, it's great sentiment but achieving that goal is like me planning to be on the moon by Monday.
Thank you for recognising the rather obvious bias in the media. Easy to forget the YEARS of Russia collusion that was being touted unendingly before during and after the election. Turns out it was all fake, sponsored by Hilary Clinton etc.
The other side of the coin is of course censorship and the "all Trump supporters are terrorists" declaration from the Whitehouse(!) with the backing of big tech who simply deleted any and all accounts which dared voice concerns over current events (at the time). The former president is still being censored by big tech.
You cannot choose to watch a feed that no longer exists though I am keenly aware of the positive feedback inducing loop of the YouTube algorithm. "You like that? You're gonna love this!"
I'm not sure I have a political stance. Certainly my views (anti-BLM, anti-antifa, anti-Islam, anti-CRT, aunty fucking Wendy) are all so called "right-wing" but to me it is merely an expression of common sense.
I **think** the idea was to police Afghanistan to remove the dangerous unmoderated build up of ant-Western radical Islamic forces. It
did work and we experienced relative calm for twenty years. That period is now at an end and this catastrophic withdrawal has handed our worst enemy EIGHTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS worth of modern weaponry. Yeah, I saw that number and couldn't believe it either.
I also am struggling to believe the US administration literally handed over a list of Afghan "friendlies" to the Taliban. Names, addresses, biometric data (retina scans, fingerprints) and told them these are the people we want to evacuate. Nominally to allow those on the list to enter the airfield, as one defence official put it "basically they just put all those people on a kill list".
Such ineptitude beggars belief.