Re: What have you done today thread?
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 2:06 pm
Put the washing out in the sunshine, have been faffing in the junk room and now realise it's pissing down, so the washing is getting a second wash........
Motorbikes, Sportsbikes, Adventure bike, Supermotos, banter, chat, friends and whatever else you can imagine. KTM, Ducati, Aprilia, Suzuki, Yamaha, BMW, Moto Guzzi, Laverda
https://revtothelimit.co.uk/
Belonging in the BYP thread, but it's always mildly irritated me when I can't work out what a personal plate means.KungFooBob wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 2:06 pmIt came with the Merc, no idea what it means. Thought we might as well keep it for £80 it cost to retain it. It hides the age of her car now.Sunny wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 1:58 pmLard?KungFooBob wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:48 am Found my old car for sale!
It's still wearing the old plates, that are now assigned to the wife's X2!
https://www.autoseven7ltd.co.uk/used-me ... re-6191538![]()
I don’t want to piss on one’s chips but the retailer may have met all of their requirements as they have provided replacements within the original guarantee period which ran from June 2019 to June 2021.Rockburner wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:39 amJune 2019 : paid £396 for a Streetguard (originally £550+vat, reduced to £220+VAT),Horse wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:51 pmIIRC you paid something like £350?Rockburner wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:15 pm
... possibly, if I decide that it'll be worth the hassle.
Claiming for that (if it's almost as-new condition?) + incidental costs, the fee is returned on a win.
You can document:
- faulty construction
- reasonable (extensive) attempts to sort outside of the court system
July 2019 : Replaced for another Streetguard
Aug 2020 : Returned 4th jacket for replacement (according to this post : viewtopic.php?p=16889&hilit=Streetguard#p16889 ) All requests for a refund at this point were refused. (Also - there were no invoices or other paperwork given to me at each of these replacements)
May 2021 : Received Pace Guard Tour jacket as replacement (Streetguards completely out of stock), Again, refund refused. BMW UK called this a "Goodwill" replacement transaction, despite this transaction still being within their 2 year manufacturing warranty period.
July 2024: First time I was caught in the rain with the Pace Guard*: Pocket leaked like a sieve. In addition a zipper was found to be missing from new: ie a manufacturing defect.
The "sticky wicket" that I'm on is that it's now over 3 years since I received the Pace Guard, (ie, well outside the BMW 2 year warranty), although I have an email from the Vines employee stating that the jacket is virtually like new. BMW also say that they've given all the "Goodwill" that they're prepared to give.
The "sticky wicket" that BMW are on is that according the Consumer Law I have a reasonable expectation of 6 years of life from any product, (according to this online tool from CAB : https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/decis ... oods/next/ ) and that I have a reasonable expectation that a product is "fit for purpose" and "of satisfactory quality": Every single jacket I have received can very easily be said to be "not fit for purpose", and "not of satisfactory quality" especially the current Pace Guard because it actually has a visible, easily observed manufacturing flaw. In addition, they have constantly refused a refund, which appears to be against the law.
I've gone through BMW's replacement service
I've gone through BMW's internal dispute resolution system
I've contacted the Motor Ombudsman (MotorCodes) who have a code of practise that allegedly BMW are registered with : they don't deal with accessories (or motorcycles);
I've contacted the MCIA (MotorCycle Industry Association): they have a dispute resolution service, but they do not deal with accessories;
I've contacted CAB: the colleague I spoke to and explained the history to said I was completely within my rights to demand a refund, and informed me that in fact I should have been offered a refund after the first replacement failed.
I've contacted the credit card company through whom the original payment was made: they're almost completely online so I'm now waiting for a response from them (bit awkward because I closed that account a couple of years ago).
I've informed BMW of all the above - including reminding them of the aspect of consumer law that I've been informed of.
So - now waiting for 30 days to see if anything comes from the cc company, if not, I'll have to consider a "small claims" case.
* Due to not commuting daily, and only doing summer riding in a different jacket
Yes, just seen this.Silly Car wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:02 pmI don’t want to piss on one’s chips but the retailer may have met all of their requirements as they have provided replacements within the original guarantee period which ran from June 2019 to June 2021.Rockburner wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:39 amJune 2019 : paid £396 for a Streetguard (originally £550+vat, reduced to £220+VAT),Horse wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:51 pm
IIRC you paid something like £350?
Claiming for that (if it's almost as-new condition?) + incidental costs, the fee is returned on a win.
You can document:
- faulty construction
- reasonable (extensive) attempts to sort outside of the court system
July 2019 : Replaced for another Streetguard
Aug 2020 : Returned 4th jacket for replacement (according to this post : viewtopic.php?p=16889&hilit=Streetguard#p16889 ) All requests for a refund at this point were refused. (Also - there were no invoices or other paperwork given to me at each of these replacements)
May 2021 : Received Pace Guard Tour jacket as replacement (Streetguards completely out of stock), Again, refund refused. BMW UK called this a "Goodwill" replacement transaction, despite this transaction still being within their 2 year manufacturing warranty period.
July 2024: First time I was caught in the rain with the Pace Guard*: Pocket leaked like a sieve. In addition a zipper was found to be missing from new: ie a manufacturing defect.
The "sticky wicket" that I'm on is that it's now over 3 years since I received the Pace Guard, (ie, well outside the BMW 2 year warranty), although I have an email from the Vines employee stating that the jacket is virtually like new. BMW also say that they've given all the "Goodwill" that they're prepared to give.
The "sticky wicket" that BMW are on is that according the Consumer Law I have a reasonable expectation of 6 years of life from any product, (according to this online tool from CAB : https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/decis ... oods/next/ ) and that I have a reasonable expectation that a product is "fit for purpose" and "of satisfactory quality": Every single jacket I have received can very easily be said to be "not fit for purpose", and "not of satisfactory quality" especially the current Pace Guard because it actually has a visible, easily observed manufacturing flaw. In addition, they have constantly refused a refund, which appears to be against the law.
I've gone through BMW's replacement service
I've gone through BMW's internal dispute resolution system
I've contacted the Motor Ombudsman (MotorCodes) who have a code of practise that allegedly BMW are registered with : they don't deal with accessories (or motorcycles);
I've contacted the MCIA (MotorCycle Industry Association): they have a dispute resolution service, but they do not deal with accessories;
I've contacted CAB: the colleague I spoke to and explained the history to said I was completely within my rights to demand a refund, and informed me that in fact I should have been offered a refund after the first replacement failed.
I've contacted the credit card company through whom the original payment was made: they're almost completely online so I'm now waiting for a response from them (bit awkward because I closed that account a couple of years ago).
I've informed BMW of all the above - including reminding them of the aspect of consumer law that I've been informed of.
So - now waiting for 30 days to see if anything comes from the cc company, if not, I'll have to consider a "small claims" case.
* Due to not commuting daily, and only doing summer riding in a different jacket
The fact that they have made goodwill replacements thereafter is likely to go in their favour as they’ve provided ‘betterment’ to their normal guarantee period, albeit the original and all others since could be argued as not fit for purpose.
You should have rejected the initial replacement garment and insisted on a refund, taking them to court in 2019 for not providing a refund under the appropriate legislation. IIRC, under Consumer Rights Act 2015, you only have a right to refund for first 30 days, thereafter, it is replace / repair and much more sticky as the time frame extends.
The Small Claims Court may be more sympathetic given the initial refusal of a refund and the fact that BMW have kept replacing the item, well until recently.
Each jacket (6 of them) leaked the first time they were used in rain, the first one was replaced after a month. Each subsequent jacket was replaced as soon as I discovered it leaked (I went through 5 jackets in less than 24 months).Cousin Jack wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:22 pmYes, just seen this.Silly Car wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:02 pmI don’t want to piss on one’s chips but the retailer may have met all of their requirements as they have provided replacements within the original guarantee period which ran from June 2019 to June 2021.Rockburner wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:39 am
June 2019 : paid £396 for a Streetguard (originally £550+vat, reduced to £220+VAT),
July 2019 : Replaced for another Streetguard
Aug 2020 : Returned 4th jacket for replacement (according to this post : viewtopic.php?p=16889&hilit=Streetguard#p16889 ) All requests for a refund at this point were refused. (Also - there were no invoices or other paperwork given to me at each of these replacements)
May 2021 : Received Pace Guard Tour jacket as replacement (Streetguards completely out of stock), Again, refund refused. BMW UK called this a "Goodwill" replacement transaction, despite this transaction still being within their 2 year manufacturing warranty period.
July 2024: First time I was caught in the rain with the Pace Guard*: Pocket leaked like a sieve. In addition a zipper was found to be missing from new: ie a manufacturing defect.
The "sticky wicket" that I'm on is that it's now over 3 years since I received the Pace Guard, (ie, well outside the BMW 2 year warranty), although I have an email from the Vines employee stating that the jacket is virtually like new. BMW also say that they've given all the "Goodwill" that they're prepared to give.
The "sticky wicket" that BMW are on is that according the Consumer Law I have a reasonable expectation of 6 years of life from any product, (according to this online tool from CAB : https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/decis ... oods/next/ ) and that I have a reasonable expectation that a product is "fit for purpose" and "of satisfactory quality": Every single jacket I have received can very easily be said to be "not fit for purpose", and "not of satisfactory quality" especially the current Pace Guard because it actually has a visible, easily observed manufacturing flaw. In addition, they have constantly refused a refund, which appears to be against the law.
I've gone through BMW's replacement service
I've gone through BMW's internal dispute resolution system
I've contacted the Motor Ombudsman (MotorCodes) who have a code of practise that allegedly BMW are registered with : they don't deal with accessories (or motorcycles);
I've contacted the MCIA (MotorCycle Industry Association): they have a dispute resolution service, but they do not deal with accessories;
I've contacted CAB: the colleague I spoke to and explained the history to said I was completely within my rights to demand a refund, and informed me that in fact I should have been offered a refund after the first replacement failed.
I've contacted the credit card company through whom the original payment was made: they're almost completely online so I'm now waiting for a response from them (bit awkward because I closed that account a couple of years ago).
I've informed BMW of all the above - including reminding them of the aspect of consumer law that I've been informed of.
So - now waiting for 30 days to see if anything comes from the cc company, if not, I'll have to consider a "small claims" case.
* Due to not commuting daily, and only doing summer riding in a different jacket
The fact that they have made goodwill replacements thereafter is likely to go in their favour as they’ve provided ‘betterment’ to their normal guarantee period, albeit the original and all others since could be argued as not fit for purpose.
You should have rejected the initial replacement garment and insisted on a refund, taking them to court in 2019 for not providing a refund under the appropriate legislation. IIRC, under Consumer Rights Act 2015, you only have a right to refund for first 30 days, thereafter, it is replace / repair and much more sticky as the time frame extends.
The Small Claims Court may be more sympathetic given the initial refusal of a refund and the fact that BMW have kept replacing the item, well until recently.
Paid £396 in 2019 for a "waterproof" jacket, guaranteed for 2 years.
After 5 years it leaks. What a surprise!
As Silly Car says, you might get a sympathetic judge.
Or you might not.
My advice would be to keep the jacket for dry days and buy a (cheaper) Oxford one for wet days.
And save yourself a load of stress.
CheersSilly Car wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 3:02 pmI don’t want to piss on one’s chips but the retailer may have met all of their requirements as they have provided replacements within the original guarantee period which ran from June 2019 to June 2021.Rockburner wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:39 amJune 2019 : paid £396 for a Streetguard (originally £550+vat, reduced to £220+VAT),Horse wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:51 pm
IIRC you paid something like £350?
Claiming for that (if it's almost as-new condition?) + incidental costs, the fee is returned on a win.
You can document:
- faulty construction
- reasonable (extensive) attempts to sort outside of the court system
July 2019 : Replaced for another Streetguard
Aug 2020 : Returned 4th jacket for replacement (according to this post : viewtopic.php?p=16889&hilit=Streetguard#p16889 ) All requests for a refund at this point were refused. (Also - there were no invoices or other paperwork given to me at each of these replacements)
May 2021 : Received Pace Guard Tour jacket as replacement (Streetguards completely out of stock), Again, refund refused. BMW UK called this a "Goodwill" replacement transaction, despite this transaction still being within their 2 year manufacturing warranty period.
July 2024: First time I was caught in the rain with the Pace Guard*: Pocket leaked like a sieve. In addition a zipper was found to be missing from new: ie a manufacturing defect.
The "sticky wicket" that I'm on is that it's now over 3 years since I received the Pace Guard, (ie, well outside the BMW 2 year warranty), although I have an email from the Vines employee stating that the jacket is virtually like new. BMW also say that they've given all the "Goodwill" that they're prepared to give.
The "sticky wicket" that BMW are on is that according the Consumer Law I have a reasonable expectation of 6 years of life from any product, (according to this online tool from CAB : https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/decis ... oods/next/ ) and that I have a reasonable expectation that a product is "fit for purpose" and "of satisfactory quality": Every single jacket I have received can very easily be said to be "not fit for purpose", and "not of satisfactory quality" especially the current Pace Guard because it actually has a visible, easily observed manufacturing flaw. In addition, they have constantly refused a refund, which appears to be against the law.
I've gone through BMW's replacement service
I've gone through BMW's internal dispute resolution system
I've contacted the Motor Ombudsman (MotorCodes) who have a code of practise that allegedly BMW are registered with : they don't deal with accessories (or motorcycles);
I've contacted the MCIA (MotorCycle Industry Association): they have a dispute resolution service, but they do not deal with accessories;
I've contacted CAB: the colleague I spoke to and explained the history to said I was completely within my rights to demand a refund, and informed me that in fact I should have been offered a refund after the first replacement failed.
I've contacted the credit card company through whom the original payment was made: they're almost completely online so I'm now waiting for a response from them (bit awkward because I closed that account a couple of years ago).
I've informed BMW of all the above - including reminding them of the aspect of consumer law that I've been informed of.
So - now waiting for 30 days to see if anything comes from the cc company, if not, I'll have to consider a "small claims" case.
* Due to not commuting daily, and only doing summer riding in a different jacket
The fact that they have made goodwill replacements thereafter is likely to go in their favour as they’ve provided ‘betterment’ to their normal guarantee period, albeit the original and all others since could be argued as not fit for purpose.
You should have rejected the initial replacement garment and insisted on a refund, taking them to court in 2019 for not providing a refund under the appropriate legislation. IIRC, under Consumer Rights Act 2015, you only have a right to refund for first 30 days, thereafter, it is replace / repair and much more sticky as the time frame extends.
The Small Claims Court may be more sympathetic given the initial refusal of a refund and the fact that BMW have kept replacing the item, well until recently.
It's being invisible while you walk through town naked.ZRX61 wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:50 pm Now faintly capable of glowing in the dark, disappointed at the apparent lack of a superpower yet..
I'm not falling for that one again..
You'll probably get bitten by a spider that suddenly finds it can ride a bike, likes Floyd tribute bands and feels compelled to make pasties.ZRX61 wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:50 pm Now faintly capable of glowing in the dark, disappointed at the apparent lack of a superpower yet..