That seems an understatement. Sad for him and familyYorick wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:27 pmHe still can't move his limbs after 4 months, and we got this message yesterday..Yorick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:24 pm Just got this from my cousin's duaghter...
David has been taken in to hospital. After his vaccine 2 weeks ago he became ill on Saturday and was taken to hospital. He has something called gullien barre syndrome. He has lost all feeling in legs and arms. He was rushed down to intensive care yesterday morning and is now unconscious and on a ventilator as he has a bad chest infection.
He's obviously an unlucky one, only 58.
David’s heart stopped the other night and they had to perform CPR to get him back. He now has a collapsed lung and also pneumonia after mucus build up from having the breathing tube in.
He's having a fucking tough time
Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23414
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5449 times
- Been thanked: 13085 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
- Yorick
- Posts: 16735
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10261 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
His daughter can only go see him for half hour each day nowweeksy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:36 pmThat seems an understatement. Sad for him and familyYorick wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 6:27 pmHe still can't move his limbs after 4 months, and we got this message yesterday..
David’s heart stopped the other night and they had to perform CPR to get him back. He now has a collapsed lung and also pneumonia after mucus build up from having the breathing tube in.
He's having a fucking tough time
We get regular updates. Usually the same news.
But he was able to watch all the Euros.
I keep sending crap jokes. They get read, but no reply. No probs.
- Yorick
- Posts: 16735
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10261 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4494
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2259 times
- Been thanked: 2190 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/10/covid-v ... 1628567601
My take on it is that it's a question of tough shit. You don't get to have 'equal rights' based upon a completely unqualified sense of it just being a bit unfair. I have to say I feel a bit sorry for those who genuinely can't be vaccinated or for whom it's less effective. But that's not what this is about. This is about idiots.
Are there really so many folk around who think? -
- "Testing has been rushed." Well, it hasn't. Independent bodies have verified the safety and efficacy - but apparently you know better? As the months tick on and there is no credible evidence that (even if this was the case, which it is not) that any of the bagful of covid vaccines does you any harm - wouldn't you change your mind? Because of evidence? But then you're the sort of person who probably believes the vaccine has magnets and microchips in it anyway, so ...
- "I'm not going to have anything the government is 'forcing' me to do" - nobody is forcing you but the rest of us have had enough of waiting for you to stop being childish about it. You're fecking privileged to have a choice FFS - many, many countries won't have widespread vaccination programs for some time yet. So - vaccine passports - yep, fair enough.
My take on it is that it's a question of tough shit. You don't get to have 'equal rights' based upon a completely unqualified sense of it just being a bit unfair. I have to say I feel a bit sorry for those who genuinely can't be vaccinated or for whom it's less effective. But that's not what this is about. This is about idiots.
Are there really so many folk around who think? -
- "Testing has been rushed." Well, it hasn't. Independent bodies have verified the safety and efficacy - but apparently you know better? As the months tick on and there is no credible evidence that (even if this was the case, which it is not) that any of the bagful of covid vaccines does you any harm - wouldn't you change your mind? Because of evidence? But then you're the sort of person who probably believes the vaccine has magnets and microchips in it anyway, so ...
- "I'm not going to have anything the government is 'forcing' me to do" - nobody is forcing you but the rest of us have had enough of waiting for you to stop being childish about it. You're fecking privileged to have a choice FFS - many, many countries won't have widespread vaccination programs for some time yet. So - vaccine passports - yep, fair enough.
Last edited by DefTrap on Wed Aug 11, 2021 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Yorick
- Posts: 16735
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10261 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I think the BBC left about 8 years ago and the building is now used by ITV for chat shows and other mindless shit.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
-
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:38 pm
- Location: North East Essex
- Has thanked: 565 times
- Been thanked: 754 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Sticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 905 times
- Been thanked: 1000 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Well there’s the better part of 5 billion vaccines been administered over the last year. That a fairly good test.Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:23 pmSticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23414
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5449 times
- Been thanked: 13085 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
There's a difference between rushed and 'put first in the queue'Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:23 pmSticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
There may be 50,000 vaccines generally that need testing, so it takes a long time because there's already 49,999 ahead of you that need signing off, agreeing, discussing.
The CV19s have gone straight in from test to "yes/no" without anything else being put in front of them
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Putting it simply, (a) the vaccines were required as a response to a global emergency, and (b) technological progress* is non-linear which after vaccine development enables the rapid development of new testing regimes.Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:23 pmSticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
* for example look at the initial rapid genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2
Last edited by irie on Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6186 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Posted here, as good as anywhere.
Any example of how it's [not] "just like flu".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-58066767
Last September, Vipul Shah spent 11 days in critical care battling Covid-19 in a hospital in Mumbai.
Mr Shah, who had no previous history of diabetes, was administered steroids which are used to treat the coronavirus infection.
Steroids reduce inflammation in the lungs for Covid-19 and appear to help stop some of the damage that can happen when the body's immune system goes into overdrive to fight off the virus.
But they also reduce immunity and push up blood sugar levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic Covid-19 patients.
Nearly a year after recovery, Mr Shah, 47, is still on medication to control his blood sugar.
Covid and diabetes: My story
"I know a lot of people like me who are taking medicines for diabetes after recovering from Covid-19," Mr Shah, a stock trader, said.
India accounts for one in six people in the world with diabetes. Home to an estimated 77 million diabetics, it is second only to China, which has 116 million people living with the disease.
Doctors reckon millions more remain undiagnosed for this chronic and progressive disease which occurs when the pancreas doesn't produce enough insulin or the body is unable to effectively use the insulin it produces.
This leads to increased concentration of glucose - a type of sugar - in the blood and poses serious health risks, including damage to the kidneys, eyes and heart.
Diabetes is among a group of underlying conditions which put people at increased risk of severe Covid-19 disease. The others are obesity, high blood pressure, and heart and lung diseases.
Now physicians fear a large number of patients who have recovered from Covid-19 are at risk of newly diagnosed, full-blown diabetes. With nearly 32 million recorded infections, India has the second-largest Covid-19 caseload in the world, behind the US.
Type 1 diabetes and Covid-19 link being investigated
"The worry is that Covid-19 could trigger a tsunami of diabetes in India after the pandemic is over," Dr Rahul Baxi, a Mumbai-based diabetologist, told me.
He said 8-10% of his patients with no history of diabetes who contracted Covid-19 continued to have high sugar levels months after recovery and were on medication.
"Some have borderline diabetes. Others are managing with medicines even a year after recovery," he said.
Doctors around the world are debating whether Covid-19 itself is causing diabetes in patients with no previous history.
This, they say, could be due to the use of steroids in treatment; the cytokine storm when the body's immune system goes into overdrive to fight off the coronavirus; and the virus itself injuring the cells in the pancreas which make insulin.
Any example of how it's [not] "just like flu".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-58066767
Last September, Vipul Shah spent 11 days in critical care battling Covid-19 in a hospital in Mumbai.
Mr Shah, who had no previous history of diabetes, was administered steroids which are used to treat the coronavirus infection.
Steroids reduce inflammation in the lungs for Covid-19 and appear to help stop some of the damage that can happen when the body's immune system goes into overdrive to fight off the virus.
But they also reduce immunity and push up blood sugar levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic Covid-19 patients.
Nearly a year after recovery, Mr Shah, 47, is still on medication to control his blood sugar.
Covid and diabetes: My story
"I know a lot of people like me who are taking medicines for diabetes after recovering from Covid-19," Mr Shah, a stock trader, said.
India accounts for one in six people in the world with diabetes. Home to an estimated 77 million diabetics, it is second only to China, which has 116 million people living with the disease.
Doctors reckon millions more remain undiagnosed for this chronic and progressive disease which occurs when the pancreas doesn't produce enough insulin or the body is unable to effectively use the insulin it produces.
This leads to increased concentration of glucose - a type of sugar - in the blood and poses serious health risks, including damage to the kidneys, eyes and heart.
Diabetes is among a group of underlying conditions which put people at increased risk of severe Covid-19 disease. The others are obesity, high blood pressure, and heart and lung diseases.
Now physicians fear a large number of patients who have recovered from Covid-19 are at risk of newly diagnosed, full-blown diabetes. With nearly 32 million recorded infections, India has the second-largest Covid-19 caseload in the world, behind the US.
Type 1 diabetes and Covid-19 link being investigated
"The worry is that Covid-19 could trigger a tsunami of diabetes in India after the pandemic is over," Dr Rahul Baxi, a Mumbai-based diabetologist, told me.
He said 8-10% of his patients with no history of diabetes who contracted Covid-19 continued to have high sugar levels months after recovery and were on medication.
"Some have borderline diabetes. Others are managing with medicines even a year after recovery," he said.
Doctors around the world are debating whether Covid-19 itself is causing diabetes in patients with no previous history.
This, they say, could be due to the use of steroids in treatment; the cytokine storm when the body's immune system goes into overdrive to fight off the coronavirus; and the virus itself injuring the cells in the pancreas which make insulin.
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:38 pm
- Location: North East Essex
- Has thanked: 565 times
- Been thanked: 754 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
And obviously the, so far unknown, long term adverse effects don't matter?wheelnut wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:09 pmWell there’s the better part of 5 billion vaccines been administered over the last year. That a fairly good test.Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:23 pmSticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
There's no way to gain 5 years worth of data about five years worth of adverse effects in one year.
Just to be clear: I've had the vaccine. I'm 72 years old, I reckon the virus is probably more dangerous to me than the vaccine, but if I were 40 and in the rude good health I enjoyed when I was 40 I'd probably decline it and if I had school age kids I'd definitely decline it for them.
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4494
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2259 times
- Been thanked: 2190 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I'm probably wasting breath butSaga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:23 pm
Sticks up hand.
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do other vaccines not get tested and approved in a year or less? Why does it take them 5, 10, even 15 years?
If the testing hasn't been rushed, why do these vaccines/gene therapies only have emergency approval?
What will happen once the emergency is declared to be over and the emergency approval lapses?
Or is the emergency going to be permanent?
Prioritised, rather than rushed. Front of the queue, taking precedence, unprecedented collaboration. And there's been a certain amount of luck and an enormous amount of skill involved - getting so many vaccines showing such high efficacy is fecking miraculous. You might say that covid19 is very similar to SARS and MERS and you might have a point, a good head start at least, certainly it would help to shorten the lead time.
Amazing what you can do if you really want to. Some would say the current regulations for drug approval are too strict. Maybe.
The priority part is at least part of the reason the FDA is saying these drugs are approved as EUA, they have to follow their own rules as much as the rest of us. If they want to deviate, they have to say how and why and assess the risks. In this case the risks also include prioritising covid vaccines to the detriment of other drugs in the approval system. The risk assessment takes account of all deviations from the standard and sets out mitigations - it had to be plausible, it can't just be bollocks.
If you want to whinge that there wasn't time to observe side effects of vaccines in many people on approval, especially across the entire demography of ages and races, then yeah, however that ship has now well and truly sailed with the subsequent rollout. To do this thoroughly, to have an answer for every question could easily take a long time. To be honest that would never really happens anyway, it's too costly, but there might be more testing, if there were findings. Side effects are standardly monitored post approval anyway, so there's no massive difference there, if anything there's more monitoring and scrutiny.
The emergency approvals won't be permanent, unless the emergency turns out to be permanent. Then I imagine at some point it won't be deemed an emergency any more.
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
IIRC, there was a similar situation with an Ebola outbreak in Africa a few years back.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-38414060
"Now, two years later, we have a vaccine. It usually takes around 10 years."
Two years? Fucking tardy bastards.
(Turns out common sense prevailing isn't such new thing after all. How disappointing for the conspiracy theorists)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-38414060
"Now, two years later, we have a vaccine. It usually takes around 10 years."
Two years? Fucking tardy bastards.
(Turns out common sense prevailing isn't such new thing after all. How disappointing for the conspiracy theorists)
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
-
- Posts: 13936
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 6241 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
No one GAS if all the restaurants and package holidays in West Africa have to shut down. That's why it took longer.
- gremlin
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 4793 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
To quote Nick Nolte's character in the film Hotel Rwanda, explaining why no aid was coming from the supposedly civilised world, "You're not even a nigger. You're an African."Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 12, 2021 2:20 pm No one GAS if all the restaurants and package holidays in West Africa have to shut down. That's why it took longer.
I think whoever wrote that line in the script summed up the state of the world quite succinctly.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- Yorick
- Posts: 16735
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10261 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Nearly a year later and he's just starting to recover. Paralysed for 10 months.Yorick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:24 pm Just got this from my cousin's duaghter...
David has been taken in to hospital. After his vaccine 2 weeks ago he became ill on Saturday and was taken to hospital. He has something called gullien barre syndrome. He has lost all feeling in legs and arms. He was rushed down to intensive care yesterday morning and is now unconscious and on a ventilator as he has a bad chest infection.
He's obviously an unlucky one, only 58.
Found some movement end of last year. Can sit in a chair now.
Today I got this message
I can't search on this device, I have to get a nurse to do it or wait for Hannah to visit. I operate this with my head, there is a little camera sitting on top of the screen and a micro dot stuck on the frame of my glasses and it turns my head into a cursor, I move my head to scroll down etc. so it has limited use and as I have no movement in my hands, it is impressive that I am trying this with my head. it also speaks the words for me so I can communicate with people but I have had my trachy removed this morning so I can now speak unaided for the first time in 11 months. I
- Yorick
- Posts: 16735
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10261 times
- Been thanked: 6885 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
We're a piss taking lot and me and his brother are debating how soon we can start the Stephen Hawkins jokes. He'd have done it to us by now
- Horse
- Posts: 11549
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6186 times
- Been thanked: 5087 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Like "Do you want diesel?"
Even bland can be a type of character