https://www.bikebound.com/2021/07/28/no ... SP9NZdK5_Q


Purposefully pleasing,though I could do without the red Suzuki shoes.


That lash-up is worth the price of the parts.Skub wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:57 pm What do you reckon this old girl will sell for at auction?
https://www.bikebound.com/2021/07/28/no ... SP9NZdK5_Q
Purposefully pleasing,though I could do without the red Suzuki shoes.
I suppose it could have been worse - it could have been a Norumph.
Not worth 10 bob to me.Skub wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:57 pm What do you reckon this old girl will sell for at auction?
https://www.bikebound.com/2021/07/28/no ... SP9NZdK5_Q
Purposefully pleasing,though I could do without the red Suzuki shoes.
The legendary sidevalve Norton 634cc single engine in a Triumph sprung hub frame?!The Spin Doctor wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 7:03 pm I suppose it could have been worse - it could have been a Norumph.

Mental money for a bike that cost £1600 brand new, less if you shopped around. I like them (I've got 1.5 of them) but they aren't worth £10K.Taipan wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:41 pm £10k!!![]()
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284384699032 ... GPygCCPriE
In the description it says first registered 5th Oct 84 (on a B plate) how come the tax disc, which has the same reg number, expires 31 May 83.Taipan wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:41 pm £10k!!![]()
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284384699032 ... GPygCCPriE
Because it’s a piece of paper, with writing on it.Newey wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:08 am In the description it says first registered 5th Oct 84 (on a B plate) how come the tax disc, which has the same reg number, expires 31 May 83.
The RS wasn't too bad.cheb wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 1:28 pm That's impressive, they took a really ugly bike and made it worse.

That would probably be a hoot to ride!
I hate to break it to you, but it was fuggly.
In BMW terms it wasn't
The RS wasn't bad. If you want ugly the R1200ST was the one. This is an improvement!

