HISTORY AT 100 MPH: 1951 NORTON MANX
-
weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23442
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5455 times
- Been thanked: 13103 times
-
derek badger
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:12 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 1135 times
-
Supermofo
- Posts: 5005
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 4366 times
- Been thanked: 2856 times
-
Tricky
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:46 pm
- Location: Chilterns
- Has thanked: 2568 times
- Been thanked: 2681 times
Re: HISTORY AT 100 MPH: 1951 NORTON MANX
There is so much wrong with that, a fred-in-a-shed bitsa bodge-up, it's horrid.
This is what a Manx should look like
This is what a Manx should look like
-
Rockburner
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
- Location: Hiding in your blind spot
- Has thanked: 7822 times
- Been thanked: 2532 times
Re: HISTORY AT 100 MPH: 1951 NORTON MANX
Is it 'just' the too long forks that are making it sit back? Or is the engine canted back a degree or two in the frame as well??
non quod, sed quomodo
-
JackyJoll
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
- Has thanked: 261 times
- Been thanked: 1267 times
Re: HISTORY AT 100 MPH: 1951 NORTON MANX
You’ve already got my opinion in the other thread.
If they’re selling that as a 1951 Manx Norton, they are criminal fraudsters.
If they’re selling that as a 1951 Manx Norton, they are criminal fraudsters.
JackyJoll wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:04 pmThat lash-up is worth the price of the parts.Skub wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:57 pm What do you reckon this old girl will sell for at auction?
https://www.bikebound.com/2021/07/28/no ... SP9NZdK5_Q
Purposefully pleasing,though I could do without the red Suzuki shoes.
That’s a frame from a roadgoing Norton.
-
cheb
- Posts: 4910
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:51 am
- Been thanked: 2623 times