Leaving aside any issues, can I just say that man that Swingarm looks expensive to make!
Sounds like the bikes were released before they were ready (yeah, shocking insight I know). The list of problems is all stuff you'd expect on a dev prototype, nothing earth shattering just a lot of little-ish stuff. Except maybe the swingarm that is, but that looks highly prone to cracks in the design they've got.
If I owned one and got that I wouldn't be that bothered, after all this is what MCN had to say for reliability and build quality:
"At this early stage, it is hard to make any assumption about the reliability of the V4SS, however stunning build quality and attention to detail would suggest problems will be kept to a minimum."
chutzpah wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:01 pm
If I owned one and got that I wouldn't be that bothered, after all this is what MCN had to say for reliability and build quality:
"At this early stage, it is hard to make any assumption about the reliability of the V4SS, however stunning build quality and attention to detail would suggest problems will be kept to a minimum."
And of course MCN are known for their objectivity
More to the point, Norton had no funds to pay suppliers, many of whom stopped delivering except for cash. I rather doubt quality control was THEIR priority.
And then there are the well-reported stories about riders turning up to collect their bikes that had been in for service and finding parts had been removed to complete other bikes which were due for delivery to a new customer.
chutzpah wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:01 pm
If I owned one and got that I wouldn't be that bothered, after all this is what MCN had to say for reliability and build quality:
"At this early stage, it is hard to make any assumption about the reliability of the V4SS, however stunning build quality and attention to detail would suggest problems will be kept to a minimum."
And of course MCN are known for their objectivity
More to the point, Norton had no funds to pay suppliers, many of whom stopped delivering except for cash. I rather doubt quality control was THEIR priority.
And then there are the well-reported stories about riders turning up to collect their bikes that had been in for service and finding parts had been removed to complete other bikes which were due for delivery to a new customer.
Yup. Brothers mate's boss's bike was in for a warranty job. He eventually was allowed to pick it up by the administrators when there was about 50% of it left. The rest had been robbed for new bikes
But they'll let you buy a new one off them (PS don't ride the old one)
The bikes sound pretty much unfixable from new.
Quoting the new Norton CEO. "I hope you will understand that our view of the likely best solution has changed over time as more material defects were identified".