Are heavy bikes bad?

Anything you like about motorbikes
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 11482
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 6129 times
Been thanked: 5044 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Horse »

demographic wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:31 pm
Horse wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:15 pm Actually, yes.

They claimed that UJMs suffered from reduced weight over the front at speed.
Ahh, the police bikes had heavy gear stored in the rear panniers with some bikes, weaved over the road a bit.
Can't remember if it was the BMWs or the Pan Ams or both.
Almost all of them :roll:

R80RT
Pans - certainly the 13

When it was the R80, I talked with a guy who was involved with a court case, from a Uni. He reckoned it was the rigid radio mounting. Civvie panniers and topbox flex, but the rigidity and weight set the rear swinging.
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
User avatar
Skub
Posts: 12128
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
Location: Norn Iron
Has thanked: 9780 times
Been thanked: 10083 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Skub »

demographic wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:31 pm
Horse wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:15 pm Actually, yes.

They claimed that UJMs suffered from reduced weight over the front at speed.
Ahh, the police bikes had heavy gear stored in the rear panniers with some bikes, weaved over the road a bit.
Can't remember if it was the BMWs or the Pan Ams or both.
A friend of mine was in the black rats at the time of the new ST1300 and he threw his up the motorway after a terminal weave. He said the ST1100 was ok but the police gear badly effected the 13.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
User avatar
Rockburner
Posts: 4331
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:06 am
Location: Hiding in your blind spot
Has thanked: 7731 times
Been thanked: 2491 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Rockburner »

Skub wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:22 pm
Horse wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:12 pm
Gregor wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 10:29 amI read somewhere the fairing was designed to create downforce at speed.
BMW were doing that from the old air-cooled R100RS onwards. That fairing had winglets 30 years before the grand prix mob.

Image
First proddy bike with a wind tunnel tested fairing,wasn't it?
I think Guzzi can claim that, they had their own wind tunnel in the 30s.

The BM likely had better analysis of the testing though. ;)
non quod, sed quomodo
The Spin Doctor
Posts: 4096
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:17 pm
Has thanked: 2635 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by The Spin Doctor »

Horse wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:15 pm
Actually, yes.

They claimed that UJMs suffered from reduced weight over the front at speed.
Speed and a BMW RS in the same sentence?
"If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer." Henry David Thoreau
www.ko-fi.com/survivalskills www.survivalskillsridertraining.co.uk www.facebook.com/survivalskills
User avatar
Noggin
Posts: 7926
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
Location: Ski Resort
Has thanked: 16025 times
Been thanked: 3885 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Noggin »

I guess that after 6 months on a heavy 600 then 8 years riding a Blackbird as my first bikes, I found the TLs and ZX10r lighter than I should!!

I am not bothered about the weight of a bike - till I drop it!! I wouldn't have been able to pick up any of my bikes alone (except one - see next line!) :(

Apart from the 390 Duke being the most fun and laughs of any other bike, it was also the only bike I've owned that I could pick up!!

But, that won't stop me getting another big (heavy) bike in the future - just need to learn to manhandle it round hairpins!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Rockburner wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:47 am Heavy bikes are just different, they can still be a load of fun when ridden the right way. :)
Zackerly!!! I never realised the Blackbird was 'that' heavy (had not bike experience really) and definitely didn't realise that it 'doesn't go round corners' :mrgreen: :angelic-green: :banana-wrench: :banana-wrench: :banana-wrench:
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!! :bblonde:
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 11482
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 6129 times
Been thanked: 5044 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Horse »

The Spin Doctor wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 8:40 pm
Horse wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 5:15 pm
Actually, yes.

They claimed that UJMs suffered from reduced weight over the front at speed.
Speed and a BMW RS in the same sentence?
Fair point. If a 'BMW' then probably 'making safe progress' might be more appropriate?
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
User avatar
rodbargee
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:30 pm
Location: N Yorks
Has thanked: 353 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by rodbargee »

THE ZZR1400 is 220 KG which is heavy but it doesn't feel heavy, the KZ1300 felt really weighty by comparison and much more precarious. edit Just checked the KZ 1300 weighed 297 KG no fucking wonder it felt heavy :angry-cussingblack:
User avatar
MingtheMerciless
Posts: 3542
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:42 am
Location: Scarfolk on Sea
Has thanked: 2928 times
Been thanked: 1877 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by MingtheMerciless »

My ZH2 is a heavy lump (240kg wet), it is a bit of a pig paddling around at walking pace but once on the move it carries its weight well. I suspect on track it’d be tiring but it’s fine on the road.
"Of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?"
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6802
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2383 times
Been thanked: 3572 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by mangocrazy »

rodbargee wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 9:51 pm THE ZZR1400 is 220 KG which is heavy but it doesn't feel heavy,
Kawasaki's web site quotes the kerb weight (wet weight) as 261 kg. That's h e a v y (maan...)
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
rodbargee
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:30 pm
Location: N Yorks
Has thanked: 353 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by rodbargee »

mangocrazy wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:20 pm
rodbargee wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 9:51 pm THE ZZR1400 is 220 KG which is heavy but it doesn't feel heavy,
Kawasaki's web site quotes the kerb weight (wet weight) as 261 kg. That's h e a v y (maan...)
seems t'internet has a few all up weights for the zzr
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13801
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15817 times
Been thanked: 10177 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Taipan »

For me a lack of steering lock/movement worsens the weight. If you have to shunt a bike about to park it and its got no lock its seems to get heavier with every step!

I had a K100RS years ago. Lovely bike on the open road but commuting on it was a nightmare. It was just so heavy and I could see gaps that I could easily fit through but the bikes weight killed its manoeuvrability as you couldn't shunt it back and forth to make the turn iyswim?

My NCX is no lightweight and sometimes that hampers it, but I can flick it about surprisingly well, although I often see gaps I'd have already been through on a scooter. But I love the NCX and it has the perfect riding position for me, so I'd forgive it most things.
Le_Fromage_Grande
Posts: 11222
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:40 pm
Location: The road of many manky motorcycles
Has thanked: 607 times
Been thanked: 4116 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Le_Fromage_Grande »

Why would you want a heavy bike if there was a lighter bike that did the same job, though heavy bikes can have shit suspension and still be okay as the ratio of sprung to unsprung weight is heavily in favour of the sprung.
Honda Owner
Dickyboy
Posts: 609
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:48 pm
Has thanked: 484 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: Are heavy bikes bad?

Post by Dickyboy »

though heavy bikes can have shit suspension and still be okay as the ratio of sprung to unsprung weight is heavily in favour of the sprung
Hmm, had the new to me 1200gs two up & panniered up for the first time yesterday and despite winding the peload right up & setting the tyre pressure the extra weight really made it wallow around the bends ☹️ might have to get the scales out as max load is 219kg...

BM is 256kg & guzzi is 235kg but that extra 20kg and higher up def seems more, would def prefer something sub 200kg