MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23439
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5455 times
- Been thanked: 13103 times
MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-rev ... -10r/2021/
Styling, aerodynamics and built-in winglets are new, the engine, chassis, geometry and electronics are tweaked and it now finally has an all-singing colour TFT dash.
But despite already being one of the most cramped superbikes around, the biggest change comes from the riding position which is more race focused than before.
Don’t let that put you off, though, because although it’s now even better on the track, it’s still fantastic in the real world and even has cruise control. It now has all the makings of being able to live with the best of its rivals.
Revised chassis geometry sees the wheelbase lengthened from 1440mm to 1450mm thanks an 8mm longer swingarm (and 1mm lower pivot) and 2mm greater fork offset.
Trail is down from 107mm to 106.7mm and weight bias is shifted 0.2% to the front. Forks springs are softer (21.0N/mm from 21.5N/mm) and the shock spring stiffer (91 N/mm to 95 N/mm).
The outgoing ZX-10R liked to be loaded-up on the brakes to turn quickly, but the ’21 bike is nimbler with more feel from the front and support from the rear. Stability, braking power and Bridgestone RS11 Racing Street rubber are all superb.
Handlebars are flatter and 10mm further forward, the seat is more steeply angled, pegs are 5mm higher and screen 40mm taller.
All this adds up to a more race bike-like riding position, although the extra wind protection is useful on the road. I’m 6ft 1in and would drop the pegs back down 5mm if I owned one and preferred the old riding position.
My arms are now too straight, I can’t look up properly riding around town and have to crouch down to see out of the mirrors. On track the new ergonomics are an improvement, apart from the high pegs.
Now the ZX-10R’s inline four-cylinder engine meets Euro5 with power and torque remaining at 200bhp and 85ftlb.
Cylinder head porting, throttle valves and an air-cooled oil cooler are new, as is the exhaust, which sounds good for a standard system. The gearbox has lower first to third ratios, the rear sprocket is up two teeth (now 17/41) and there are now seven riding modes: Rain, Road, Sport and four custom settings.
The engine is peaky with soft power down low, but it’s but tuned for lap times and rear tyre life, so those who like power wheelies will be disappointed.
As far as rider aids go the ZX-10R has it all: KCMF (cornering ABS and traction control system), S-KTRC (traction control), KLCM (launch control), KIBS (ABS), KEBC (engine brake control), KQS (quickshifter), ESD (electronic steering damper) and KCC (cruise control) - a top shelf electronics package to rival the European competition, but with a Japanese price tag.
The cruise control makes long motorway rides less painful for wrists and the up/down quickshifter works well, even at low speed.
Traction control is good on the road but still lets the rear spin-up on track in the wet, even in Rain mode, before the electronics eventually chime in to keep everything in check. But ultimately the ZX-10R never steps out of line.
The ZX-10R remains good value when you consider what you are getting in terms of technology, speed and genuine track pedigree. It’s the only one of the litre inline four Japanese sportsbikes that can genuinely boast race success on a world level.
The road bikes to beat mostly come from Europe, though, in the form of the BMW S1000RR (£15,590) and Ducati Panigale V4 (£19,995). And despite not having the racing success of the Kawasaki, the Honda CBR1000RR-R (£19,999) can't be ruled out as a road-going superbike either.
Styling, aerodynamics and built-in winglets are new, the engine, chassis, geometry and electronics are tweaked and it now finally has an all-singing colour TFT dash.
But despite already being one of the most cramped superbikes around, the biggest change comes from the riding position which is more race focused than before.
Don’t let that put you off, though, because although it’s now even better on the track, it’s still fantastic in the real world and even has cruise control. It now has all the makings of being able to live with the best of its rivals.
Revised chassis geometry sees the wheelbase lengthened from 1440mm to 1450mm thanks an 8mm longer swingarm (and 1mm lower pivot) and 2mm greater fork offset.
Trail is down from 107mm to 106.7mm and weight bias is shifted 0.2% to the front. Forks springs are softer (21.0N/mm from 21.5N/mm) and the shock spring stiffer (91 N/mm to 95 N/mm).
The outgoing ZX-10R liked to be loaded-up on the brakes to turn quickly, but the ’21 bike is nimbler with more feel from the front and support from the rear. Stability, braking power and Bridgestone RS11 Racing Street rubber are all superb.
Handlebars are flatter and 10mm further forward, the seat is more steeply angled, pegs are 5mm higher and screen 40mm taller.
All this adds up to a more race bike-like riding position, although the extra wind protection is useful on the road. I’m 6ft 1in and would drop the pegs back down 5mm if I owned one and preferred the old riding position.
My arms are now too straight, I can’t look up properly riding around town and have to crouch down to see out of the mirrors. On track the new ergonomics are an improvement, apart from the high pegs.
Now the ZX-10R’s inline four-cylinder engine meets Euro5 with power and torque remaining at 200bhp and 85ftlb.
Cylinder head porting, throttle valves and an air-cooled oil cooler are new, as is the exhaust, which sounds good for a standard system. The gearbox has lower first to third ratios, the rear sprocket is up two teeth (now 17/41) and there are now seven riding modes: Rain, Road, Sport and four custom settings.
The engine is peaky with soft power down low, but it’s but tuned for lap times and rear tyre life, so those who like power wheelies will be disappointed.
As far as rider aids go the ZX-10R has it all: KCMF (cornering ABS and traction control system), S-KTRC (traction control), KLCM (launch control), KIBS (ABS), KEBC (engine brake control), KQS (quickshifter), ESD (electronic steering damper) and KCC (cruise control) - a top shelf electronics package to rival the European competition, but with a Japanese price tag.
The cruise control makes long motorway rides less painful for wrists and the up/down quickshifter works well, even at low speed.
Traction control is good on the road but still lets the rear spin-up on track in the wet, even in Rain mode, before the electronics eventually chime in to keep everything in check. But ultimately the ZX-10R never steps out of line.
The ZX-10R remains good value when you consider what you are getting in terms of technology, speed and genuine track pedigree. It’s the only one of the litre inline four Japanese sportsbikes that can genuinely boast race success on a world level.
The road bikes to beat mostly come from Europe, though, in the form of the BMW S1000RR (£15,590) and Ducati Panigale V4 (£19,995). And despite not having the racing success of the Kawasaki, the Honda CBR1000RR-R (£19,999) can't be ruled out as a road-going superbike either.
- Yorick
- Posts: 16756
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10280 times
- Been thanked: 6892 times
-
- Posts: 5005
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 4366 times
- Been thanked: 2856 times
- Skub
- Posts: 12182
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 9845 times
- Been thanked: 10157 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I dig the shape of the bike,but the paintjob doesn't gel terribly well. I especially dislike the white 'Kawasaki' on the bellypan. Looks really cheap aftermarket. I'd be looking at other options aesthetically, if I was buying. (which I'm not)
The pipe/cat needs to go,yet it's not the worst looking,just a bit 'scooter'.
Mrs.Weeksy's new track tool perhaps?
The pipe/cat needs to go,yet it's not the worst looking,just a bit 'scooter'.
Mrs.Weeksy's new track tool perhaps?
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6934
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2409 times
- Been thanked: 3639 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
The angle that photograph has been taken from really does the cat and exhaust no favours at all. The cat in particular is just spectacularly ugly, whereas the exhaust is just big and ugly. But it's all down to Euro 5, I'm sure.weeksy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:03 am https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-rev ... -10r/2021/
Forks springs are softer (21.0N/mm from 21.5N/mm) and the shock spring stiffer (91 N/mm to 95 N/mm).
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
Other than that it's not a bike that would ever interest me, although I'm sure Johnny Rea would disagree
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- Skub
- Posts: 12182
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 9845 times
- Been thanked: 10157 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
The ZX10R weighs around 209kgs wet and a 690 seems to be at 150kgs.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
An aftermarket exhaust and junking the cat would shed a load more from the 10. My Z1000 tipped the scales at a beefy 220kgs,but losing the stock system alone took the weight down to 207kgs,lighter than a stock 10R.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2021 4:52 pm
- Location: Farnborough, Hants
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I do like this colour scheme. The kawasaki green is still in there and gives it some good lines. Each to their own of course.
I bet it goes like stink!
I bet it goes like stink!
- MingtheMerciless
- Posts: 3557
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:42 am
- Location: Scarfolk on Sea
- Has thanked: 2948 times
- Been thanked: 1884 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I like, but then I'm "a green blooded inhuman hobgoblin" (in best Bones voice).
"Of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?"
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
-
- Posts: 13979
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2554 times
- Been thanked: 6262 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
You're assuming that everything else is like for like though.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
- Yorick
- Posts: 16756
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10280 times
- Been thanked: 6892 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
Try again.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pmThe Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6934
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2409 times
- Been thanked: 3639 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
Yes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pmYou're assuming that everything else is like for like though.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23439
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5455 times
- Been thanked: 13103 times
-
- Posts: 13979
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2554 times
- Been thanked: 6262 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
If it is a typo it must be in Kwak's press info cause other outlets repeat it too...mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:32 pmYes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pmYou're assuming that everything else is like for like though.mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
https://www.mcnews.com.au/2021-kawasaki ... fications/
Edit: Or they're just quoting a total figure for both legs...so it would be 10.75N/mm in each. Springs in parallel just sum.
Last edited by Mr. Dazzle on Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2020 8:52 pm
- Has thanked: 498 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I reckon I'd still beat it round a roundabout in my Barry'd up old BMW.
To a kid looking up to me, life ain't nothing but bitches and money.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6934
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2409 times
- Been thanked: 3639 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I'd hazard a guess that the error has been propagated in all subsequent iterations from the original.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:35 pmIf it is a typo it must be in Kwak's press info cause other outlets repeat it too...mangocrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:32 pm Yes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.
https://www.mcnews.com.au/2021-kawasaki ... fications/
Much prefer the colour schemes that the Aussies are getting. Makes the black one look really frumpy.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
-
- Posts: 13979
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2554 times
- Been thanked: 6262 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
See above...probably just the fork total rather than each spring, which actually makes more sense really.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6934
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2409 times
- Been thanked: 3639 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
It's a possibility, but it's completely contrary to the way fork spring rates are normally expressed. It's always per spring, not some notional amalgamation of rates. You'd only express it that way if only one fork leg was sprung.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:35 pm Edit: Or they're just quoting a total figure for both legs...so it would be 10.75N/mm in each. Springs in parallel just sum.
Even then, that's a very high spring rate. According to the table below, that would mean the Big K assumes all their sports bike owners/riders are 280 lb/20 stone pie eating bloaters...
Nah. I don't buy it. Someone in Kawasaki's press department cocked up.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:56 pm
- Has thanked: 326 times
- Been thanked: 2173 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
Looks good tbh, isn’t it still basically the 2011 bike though as each year they say the same thing
- Skub
- Posts: 12182
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 9845 times
- Been thanked: 10157 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
I'd be interested to hear what Mark @SSR Suspension has to say.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
-
- Posts: 13979
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2554 times
- Been thanked: 6262 times
Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review
Owners forums seems to think stock bikes (last year) were 11N a side, so 22N in total if you assume Kwak are quoting the total fork as I suspect.
Two legs together is just the spring rate in each leg added together. We tend to think in terms of what's in each leg cause if you buy springs that's what it says on the box, but from a performance/design POV its the sum total of both legs which matters.
https://www.zx-10r.net/threads/stock-sh ... te.354266/
So it would seem, yes...Kawasaki do think their riders have been at the pies!
Two legs together is just the spring rate in each leg added together. We tend to think in terms of what's in each leg cause if you buy springs that's what it says on the box, but from a performance/design POV its the sum total of both legs which matters.
https://www.zx-10r.net/threads/stock-sh ... te.354266/
So it would seem, yes...Kawasaki do think their riders have been at the pies!