MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Anything you like about motorbikes
User avatar
weeksy
Site Admin
Posts: 23439
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 5455 times
Been thanked: 13103 times

MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by weeksy »

https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-rev ... -10r/2021/

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Styling, aerodynamics and built-in winglets are new, the engine, chassis, geometry and electronics are tweaked and it now finally has an all-singing colour TFT dash.

But despite already being one of the most cramped superbikes around, the biggest change comes from the riding position which is more race focused than before.

Don’t let that put you off, though, because although it’s now even better on the track, it’s still fantastic in the real world and even has cruise control. It now has all the makings of being able to live with the best of its rivals.

Revised chassis geometry sees the wheelbase lengthened from 1440mm to 1450mm thanks an 8mm longer swingarm (and 1mm lower pivot) and 2mm greater fork offset.

Trail is down from 107mm to 106.7mm and weight bias is shifted 0.2% to the front. Forks springs are softer (21.0N/mm from 21.5N/mm) and the shock spring stiffer (91 N/mm to 95 N/mm).

The outgoing ZX-10R liked to be loaded-up on the brakes to turn quickly, but the ’21 bike is nimbler with more feel from the front and support from the rear. Stability, braking power and Bridgestone RS11 Racing Street rubber are all superb.

Handlebars are flatter and 10mm further forward, the seat is more steeply angled, pegs are 5mm higher and screen 40mm taller.

All this adds up to a more race bike-like riding position, although the extra wind protection is useful on the road. I’m 6ft 1in and would drop the pegs back down 5mm if I owned one and preferred the old riding position.

My arms are now too straight, I can’t look up properly riding around town and have to crouch down to see out of the mirrors. On track the new ergonomics are an improvement, apart from the high pegs.

Now the ZX-10R’s inline four-cylinder engine meets Euro5 with power and torque remaining at 200bhp and 85ftlb.

Cylinder head porting, throttle valves and an air-cooled oil cooler are new, as is the exhaust, which sounds good for a standard system. The gearbox has lower first to third ratios, the rear sprocket is up two teeth (now 17/41) and there are now seven riding modes: Rain, Road, Sport and four custom settings.

The engine is peaky with soft power down low, but it’s but tuned for lap times and rear tyre life, so those who like power wheelies will be disappointed.

As far as rider aids go the ZX-10R has it all: KCMF (cornering ABS and traction control system), S-KTRC (traction control), KLCM (launch control), KIBS (ABS), KEBC (engine brake control), KQS (quickshifter), ESD (electronic steering damper) and KCC (cruise control) - a top shelf electronics package to rival the European competition, but with a Japanese price tag.

The cruise control makes long motorway rides less painful for wrists and the up/down quickshifter works well, even at low speed.

Traction control is good on the road but still lets the rear spin-up on track in the wet, even in Rain mode, before the electronics eventually chime in to keep everything in check. But ultimately the ZX-10R never steps out of line.

The ZX-10R remains good value when you consider what you are getting in terms of technology, speed and genuine track pedigree. It’s the only one of the litre inline four Japanese sportsbikes that can genuinely boast race success on a world level.

The road bikes to beat mostly come from Europe, though, in the form of the BMW S1000RR (£15,590) and Ducati Panigale V4 (£19,995). And despite not having the racing success of the Kawasaki, the Honda CBR1000RR-R (£19,999) can't be ruled out as a road-going superbike either.
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16756
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10280 times
Been thanked: 6892 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Yorick »

The cruise control sold it for me :)
Supermofo
Posts: 5005
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
Has thanked: 4366 times
Been thanked: 2856 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Supermofo »

Not the best looking bike but I love the colour scheme
User avatar
Skub
Posts: 12182
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
Location: Norn Iron
Has thanked: 9845 times
Been thanked: 10157 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Skub »

I dig the shape of the bike,but the paintjob doesn't gel terribly well. I especially dislike the white 'Kawasaki' on the bellypan. Looks really cheap aftermarket. I'd be looking at other options aesthetically, if I was buying. (which I'm not)

The pipe/cat needs to go,yet it's not the worst looking,just a bit 'scooter'.

Mrs.Weeksy's new track tool perhaps? :thumbup:
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6934
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2409 times
Been thanked: 3639 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by mangocrazy »

weeksy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:03 am https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-rev ... -10r/2021/

Image

Forks springs are softer (21.0N/mm from 21.5N/mm) and the shock spring stiffer (91 N/mm to 95 N/mm).
The angle that photograph has been taken from really does the cat and exhaust no favours at all. The cat in particular is just spectacularly ugly, whereas the exhaust is just big and ugly. But it's all down to Euro 5, I'm sure.

And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.

Other than that it's not a bike that would ever interest me, although I'm sure Johnny Rea would disagree
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
Skub
Posts: 12182
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
Location: Norn Iron
Has thanked: 9845 times
Been thanked: 10157 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Skub »

mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
The ZX10R weighs around 209kgs wet and a 690 seems to be at 150kgs.

An aftermarket exhaust and junking the cat would shed a load more from the 10. My Z1000 tipped the scales at a beefy 220kgs,but losing the stock system alone took the weight down to 207kgs,lighter than a stock 10R.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
_AJ_
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2021 4:52 pm
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by _AJ_ »

I do like this colour scheme. The kawasaki green is still in there and gives it some good lines. Each to their own of course.
I bet it goes like stink!
User avatar
MingtheMerciless
Posts: 3557
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:42 am
Location: Scarfolk on Sea
Has thanked: 2948 times
Been thanked: 1884 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by MingtheMerciless »

I like, but then I'm "a green blooded inhuman hobgoblin" (in best Bones voice).
"Of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?"
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13979
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2554 times
Been thanked: 6262 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
You're assuming that everything else is like for like though.

The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16756
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10280 times
Been thanked: 6892 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Yorick »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
Try again.
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6934
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2409 times
Been thanked: 3639 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by mangocrazy »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
You're assuming that everything else is like for like though.

The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
Yes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
weeksy
Site Admin
Posts: 23439
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 5455 times
Been thanked: 13103 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by weeksy »

Skub wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:26 pm
Mrs.Weeksy's new track tool perhaps? :thumbup:
Not if I have my way.
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13979
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2554 times
Been thanked: 6262 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:32 pm
Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 5:43 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 4:40 pm
And those figures of 21.0/21.5 have to be a misprint. The fork spring rate on a 690 Duke is 6.0 N/mm. Is a ZX10-R three and a half times heavier than a 690 Duke? I don't think so.
You're assuming that everything else is like for like though.

The Kwak will be alot stiffer settings for one, it has much more sophisticated damping for another and also has different geometry. The Kwak probably has much steeper steering (just a guess) which i think would demand a higher spring rate for the same wheel rate, if I'm picturing it the right way around in my head.
Yes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.
If it is a typo it must be in Kwak's press info cause other outlets repeat it too...

https://www.mcnews.com.au/2021-kawasaki ... fications/

Edit: Or they're just quoting a total figure for both legs...so it would be 10.75N/mm in each. Springs in parallel just sum.
Last edited by Mr. Dazzle on Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Asian Boss
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2020 8:52 pm
Has thanked: 498 times
Been thanked: 650 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Asian Boss »

I reckon I'd still beat it round a roundabout in my Barry'd up old BMW.
To a kid looking up to me, life ain't nothing but bitches and money.
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6934
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2409 times
Been thanked: 3639 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by mangocrazy »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:35 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:32 pm Yes, I'd factored all that in. I could understand if it was 1.5 x the Duke spring rate or even (at a push) 2 x. But 3.5 x ? Nah sorry, that's just plain wrong.
If it is a typo it must be in Kwak's press info cause other outlets repeat it too...

https://www.mcnews.com.au/2021-kawasaki ... fications/
I'd hazard a guess that the error has been propagated in all subsequent iterations from the original.

Much prefer the colour schemes that the Aussies are getting. Makes the black one look really frumpy.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13979
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2554 times
Been thanked: 6262 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

See above...probably just the fork total rather than each spring, which actually makes more sense really.
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6934
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2409 times
Been thanked: 3639 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by mangocrazy »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:35 pm Edit: Or they're just quoting a total figure for both legs...so it would be 10.75N/mm in each. Springs in parallel just sum.
It's a possibility, but it's completely contrary to the way fork spring rates are normally expressed. It's always per spring, not some notional amalgamation of rates. You'd only express it that way if only one fork leg was sprung.

Even then, that's a very high spring rate. According to the table below, that would mean the Big K assumes all their sports bike owners/riders are 280 lb/20 stone pie eating bloaters...

KawaSpring.JPG
KawaSpring.JPG (39.64 KiB) Viewed 1401 times

Nah. I don't buy it. Someone in Kawasaki's press department cocked up.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
Couchy
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:56 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 2173 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Couchy »

Looks good tbh, isn’t it still basically the 2011 bike though as each year they say the same thing
User avatar
Skub
Posts: 12182
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
Location: Norn Iron
Has thanked: 9845 times
Been thanked: 10157 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Skub »

I'd be interested to hear what Mark @SSR Suspension has to say.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13979
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2554 times
Been thanked: 6262 times

Re: MCN KAWASAKI ZX-10R (2021 - on) Review

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Owners forums seems to think stock bikes (last year) were 11N a side, so 22N in total if you assume Kwak are quoting the total fork as I suspect.

Two legs together is just the spring rate in each leg added together. We tend to think in terms of what's in each leg cause if you buy springs that's what it says on the box, but from a performance/design POV its the sum total of both legs which matters.

https://www.zx-10r.net/threads/stock-sh ... te.354266/

So it would seem, yes...Kawasaki do think their riders have been at the pies!