I think the fact Russia went to the trouble of doing an interview with the very respectful looking “church tourists” answered where that came from, but yeah, had it not have been for that, I would have my doubts. Alas....slowsider wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:27 pmCourse not. Even Porton Down managed to divert suspicion to a couple of steeple-admiring church-loving touristsWreckless Rat wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:13 pm ...and finally. Do you think any country would have gone, “oops our bad, we kind of let that one out...sorry” let alone China, a secretive, authoritarian country who much of the world distrusts enough already. The world would be queuing up for reparations....
If you do think anyone would, until the smoking gun was located in their hand. I have some magic beans forsale. They might look like coffee beans but.... they grow a magic beanstalk, honest.
Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
-
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:25 am
- Has thanked: 666 times
- Been thanked: 704 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
- Horse
- Posts: 11558
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6196 times
- Been thanked: 5088 times
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23427
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5452 times
- Been thanked: 13097 times
-
- Posts: 5002
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 4362 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
This is promising. Not reviewed yet but seems to suggest the AZ vaccine cuts transmission to an extent and that 1 dose should work fine with a delayed 2nd dose.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55910964
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55910964
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23427
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5452 times
- Been thanked: 13097 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
That is indeed bloody awesome news mate yes.Supermofo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 9:35 am This is promising. Not reviewed yet but seems to suggest the AZ vaccine cuts transmission to an extent and that 1 dose should work fine with a delayed 2nd dose.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55910964
-
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:25 am
- Has thanked: 666 times
- Been thanked: 704 times
-
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:51 am
- Been thanked: 2618 times
-
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 838 times
- Been thanked: 1240 times
-
- Posts: 5002
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 4362 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
This is also good news
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55905158
88% of people who've had Covid had anti bodies after 6 months, so between vaccine and previous carriers that should help the numbers this year you'd hope.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55905158
88% of people who've had Covid had anti bodies after 6 months, so between vaccine and previous carriers that should help the numbers this year you'd hope.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23427
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5452 times
- Been thanked: 13097 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I live in blind hope that people will realise if they're arseholes i will lock the thread. Sometimes it will be a few hours, sometimes it will be a few days. TBH i don't much come into this thread, but someone reported a post, i deleted the post and the quote of it and closed the thread.
I was tempted to throw out a warning, but i'm not sure people care. However, i'll start imposing short term bans
I was tempted to throw out a warning, but i'm not sure people care. However, i'll start imposing short term bans
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
This is for the AstraZeneca vaccine, will be interesting to see if the other vaccines give similar protection.Supermofo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 9:35 am This is promising. Not reviewed yet but seems to suggest the AZ vaccine cuts transmission to an extent and that 1 dose should work fine with a delayed 2nd dose.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55910964
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- Noggin
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 16222 times
- Been thanked: 3927 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2554 times
- Been thanked: 2287 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Logic suggests that they could be, but only a low-level carrier, ie not very infectious.Noggin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:23 am I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
If their immune system is stopping the virus infecting them it is almost certainly stopping it multiplying much. It must be a sort of Mexican stand-off between the immune system and the virus. AFAIK most viral diseases ae most infectious when the virus is winning and multiplying fast, usually just before the immune system kicks it into touch.
Of course I might be quite wrong.
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!
-
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:25 am
- Has thanked: 666 times
- Been thanked: 704 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
My understanding is we aren't sure. Vaccines are of two types, can't recall the names. One type can stop you carrying the virus at all, the other type just stop you getting really ill from it. The former is rare, the latter most common. But, the latter will massively reduce your viral load, meaning you wont spread it as much or for as long.Noggin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:23 am I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
I think...
- Noggin
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 16222 times
- Been thanked: 3927 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:33 amLogic suggests that they could be, but only a low-level carrier, ie not very infectious.Noggin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:23 am
I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
If their immune system is stopping the virus infecting them it is almost certainly stopping it multiplying much. It must be a sort of Mexican stand-off between the immune system and the virus. AFAIK most viral diseases ae most infectious when the virus is winning and multiplying fast, usually just before the immune system kicks it into touch.
Of course I might be quite wrong.
Thanx guys. That confirms what I had thought (but couldn't be sure if I was just making it up in my head of if it made sense!!)Wreckless Rat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:33 am My understanding is we aren't sure. Vaccines are of two types, can't recall the names. One type can stop you carrying the virus at all, the other type just stop you getting really ill from it. The former is rare, the latter most common. But, the latter will massively reduce your viral load, meaning you wont spread it as much or for as long.
I think...
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
- gremlin
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 4805 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Won't be long before we can go about our business of sniffing the ladies' toilet seats again, eh lads?
Or is that just me?
Or is that just me?
- Yorick
- Posts: 16750
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10271 times
- Been thanked: 6887 times
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:45 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 215 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Here's a bit of reading that may answer some of your questions. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/ ... ion10.htmlNoggin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:23 am I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
- Noggin
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 16222 times
- Been thanked: 3927 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
Thank youBike Breaker wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 4:55 pmHere's a bit of reading that may answer some of your questions. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/ ... ion10.htmlNoggin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:23 am I wasn't sure if I should start a separate thread but figured we don't need another Covid thread
If someone has had Covid in the past year (nearer a year than now), presuming that they wouldn't get it again (big presumption I guess) would they still be a carrier?
I can't work out how they'd carry the virus whilst not 'having' it. But then I've avoided digging too deep into it for now.
I've googled a bit but didn't get much from that. So thought I'd ask the oracles on here
I've pretty much decided that I should have a second test before going back to the physio. I don't know when he saw the patient that passed it to him or how long he wasn't showing symptoms. So I think I should go down the valley to get retested next week - probably
Will go ask the Doctor tomorrow (need to go anyway for something else) and find out what he thinks
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
-
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2020 8:52 pm
- Has thanked: 498 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved
"Liar. You're a liar. Mandem, he's a liar... You're a liar. You lie about the COVID-19 cases. Stop lying to the TV, man."
That made my afternoon, mandem. From his voice I did expect the protagonist to be more brown that he turned out to be. Maybe he was a bit brown and making the most of it.
And while I have had a lot of respect for Chris Whitty, isn't he telling us to only go out for essential things....? Is going to a street food booth for lunch and hanging about near it essential? He could have made a packed lunch, mandem! Maybe it's ok for me to go to the Londis, buy a bottle of bluedrink and and several scratchcards by number, then stand immediately outside the shop drinking the drink and doing the scratchcards, mandem.
That made my afternoon, mandem. From his voice I did expect the protagonist to be more brown that he turned out to be. Maybe he was a bit brown and making the most of it.
And while I have had a lot of respect for Chris Whitty, isn't he telling us to only go out for essential things....? Is going to a street food booth for lunch and hanging about near it essential? He could have made a packed lunch, mandem! Maybe it's ok for me to go to the Londis, buy a bottle of bluedrink and and several scratchcards by number, then stand immediately outside the shop drinking the drink and doing the scratchcards, mandem.
To a kid looking up to me, life ain't nothing but bitches and money.