Should have posted this an hour ago, before WR made the similar point:slowsider wrote: ↑Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:42 pm2. EU regulations permit member states to issue temporary approval in an emergency.
The MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have done the same
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4759
If, say, Ireland were to issue temporary emergency approval of the AstraZeneca vaccine, would it be able to actually get some?
The EU Joint Procurement of Covid-19 vaccines means that the Ireland isn't allowed to buy vaccines itself and has to wait for the EU to give them their allocation...not that Germany would worry about the rules
I keep seeing my 'nat' friends saying that the UK could have done what it has with the vaccine programme even if we were in the EU.
I wonder why none of the 27 member states decided to do so. Is it because the EU Commission was going to spend €2.4bn of EU [sic] funds anyway or that an increasingly vindictive Commission wouldn't look kindly on a lack of unity?
I noticed that in November the EU Commission proposed making all joint procurements exclusive, like the vaccine.
https://www.insideeulifesciences.com/20 ... agreement/
I haven't heard how successful the joint procurements of PPE and ventilators, that Boris' crowd took so much flak for not joining, got on. I did look; presumably that means 'not very well' as anything the EU does half-competently normally gets a whole lot of publicity, especially if the UK gov't shuns it?