Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:56 pm
All I'm gonna say is that you might want to try reading that document you linked and follow the context around the selected quotes you made.
Similarly, I saw lots of these YouTube videos that purport to show 'something' back in November and I saw lots of those graphs which show 'anomalies'. In the former case you're selectively looking at 3s of footage out of context and in the latter the results weren't even anomalous - there were plenty of Trump only vote jumps etc. too.
I'm not gonna get into a massive multi quote reply string though.
They are not "selective quotes", I have "quoted" the entire document and I am going to take a flying guess it is the first time you have seen it. Therefore I have highlighted the relevant areas which I suggest makes mail in voting the default for the entire country, legitimises ballot harvesting (despite the Dems claiming they didn't do it, now they inexplicably want to legalise it) and removing the need for formal identification for absentee ballots.
Plenty other shenanigans like allowing undocumented migrants (illegal aliens for those who can't keep up with left wing doublespeak) to be "counted" which bumps up the electoral count for those States with the most illegals.
You are suggesting that allowing absentee ballots from unidentified persons is fine by you and I need to "follow the context" for some unspecified reason. If you have something to say, say it because my take away is that the Dems are simply making those things they were were furiously denying doing illegally, now legal.
I sincerely doubt you looked though the statistical data to the extent that I did and I am not referring merely to the sudden spikes. I also refer to inexplicable drops in incremental vote counts. How is it possible for an incremental count to be negative? Did someone make a "mistake" (several thousand times!) or perhaps it would be so obvious no-one could get away with it?
The answer is easy. All you have to do is make sure the overall vote count goes up but change the unmonitored "batch votes" so that those changes are not flagged. They only exist in the deep data. Votes removed from Trump and assigned to Biden. You avoid the situation where you see the incremental count for Trump going negative (which no-one can argue is impossible) but it is hidden behind the overall count which inexplicably "spikes" for one candidate over another. That data is published by each relevant sate and is there for anyone to see if only they would look.
It is pretty obvious and the reason I am so preoccupied with this nonsense is because people simply refuse to even see it. Relying on rhetoric like "it's been debunked" or "it's been through court" neither of which is true.
Show me ONE example where a court has made a decision on voter fraud. What you will discover is the "decision" was made not to even consider it.