Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 9:31 pm
Well they will keep on going whatever..."collapse" doesn't mean they all just say "fuck it", switch the lights off and go home.
It just means lots more people die than otherwise would have, and that the NHS may not be there for you if you need it. Best just hope you don't need it is all.
Given that this is a virus pandemic that has become more infectious and virulent, exactly what events should and could have taken place that would not have resulted in people dying who "otherwise would [not] have"?
People do not understand who this virus kills. The government says that this virus primarily kills the old - this is true but only because the overwhelming majority of the over 60s have pre-existing health conditions. In other words, the primary correlation is with pre-existing health conditions, NOT with age. Look at these ONS statistics (17 Dec 2020)
Breakdown by pre existing condition
Pre existing condition
Age group Yes No Unknown presence of pre-existing condition Total
Total 43,555 1,911 0 45,466
0 - 19 yrs 21 6 0 27
20 - 39 255 42 0 297
40 - 59 2,817 329 0 3,146
60 - 79 16,544 799 0 17,343
80+ 23,918 735 0 24,653
Unknown age 0 0 0 0
In the 60-79 age group, over 95% of fatalities have pre-existing conditions.
In the 80+ age group, over 97% have pre-existing conditions.
22% of the UK population of 66m is over 60 with a pre-existing condition rate of over 95%.
This means that there are far more than 13m over 60 year olds with pre-existing conditions for the virus to attack (0.22 x 66m x 0.95).
Those with pre-existing conditions can not rely on the NHS, they must shield themselves.