Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Current affairs, Politics, News.
asmethurst99
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:01 pm
Location: The Gate of the Forest
Has thanked: 1042 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by asmethurst99 »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:59 pm I can see why those things would be relevant to a full time employee. Thats what I was referring to when I said it's probably a copy/paste.

Thing is, the people volunteering to vaccinate aren't looking for a job in the NHS generally. They want to turn up, jab some people and then go home.
I know - maybe we aren't there yet with allowing people to do it as you say - it wouldn't take much of a cock up make a complete disaster (it's not too great now ) but maybe to get the numbers up we will have to change our expectation .
A decent ITU nurse takes about 5 years to grow
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by irie »

wheelnut wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:40 pm
irie wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:12 pm That is plain fucking ridiculous.
I realise I’m probably in a group of 1 here, but I don’t think that is particularly ridiculous, certainly for someone that doesn’t have a current professional registration.

I can’t imagine it taking more than a couple of hours to wade through.
Perhaps not for someone who does not have a current profession registration, but is there an accelerated path for someone who does have a current professional registration? Doesn't look like it.

This is a national emergency ffs
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by irie »

asmethurst99 wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:07 pm
Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:59 pm I can see why those things would be relevant to a full time employee. Thats what I was referring to when I said it's probably a copy/paste.

Thing is, the people volunteering to vaccinate aren't looking for a job in the NHS generally. They want to turn up, jab some people and then go home.
I know - maybe we aren't there yet with allowing people to do it as you say - it wouldn't take much of a cock up make a complete disaster (it's not too great now ) but maybe to get the numbers up we will have to change our expectation .
A decent ITU nurse takes about 5 years to grow
What does being a qualified ITU nurse have to do with administering Covid jabs?
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
asmethurst99
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:01 pm
Location: The Gate of the Forest
Has thanked: 1042 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by asmethurst99 »

irie wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:10 pm
wheelnut wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:40 pm
irie wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:12 pm That is plain fucking ridiculous.
I realise I’m probably in a group of 1 here, but I don’t think that is particularly ridiculous, certainly for someone that doesn’t have a current professional registration.

I can’t imagine it taking more than a couple of hours to wade through.
Perhaps not for someone who does not have a current profession registration, but is there an accelerated path for someone who does have a current professional registration? Doesn't look like it.

This is a national emergency ffs
Chatting on FB this appears to be a problem - in some area St Jonhs are doing it (they are a pretty good organisation under the peaked hats and have up to date kit) and they have lots of NHS bods working for them.
NHS professionals - I had some doings with them earlier re contact tracing and their admin and reply timetable was underwhelming but I don't know what there workload etc was like at the time so let's see how they perform if they re involved .
asmethurst99
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:01 pm
Location: The Gate of the Forest
Has thanked: 1042 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by asmethurst99 »

irie wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:12 pm
asmethurst99 wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:07 pm
Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:59 pm I can see why those things would be relevant to a full time employee. Thats what I was referring to when I said it's probably a copy/paste.

Thing is, the people volunteering to vaccinate aren't looking for a job in the NHS generally. They want to turn up, jab some people and then go home.
I know - maybe we aren't there yet with allowing people to do it as you say - it wouldn't take much of a cock up make a complete disaster (it's not too great now ) but maybe to get the numbers up we will have to change our expectation .
A decent ITU nurse takes about 5 years to grow
What does being a qualified ITU nurse have to do with administering Covid jabs?
If we don't get on top of the virus we will need more of them.
(it was a flippant aside)
User avatar
wheelnut
Posts: 2229
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Has thanked: 907 times
Been thanked: 1001 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by wheelnut »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:59 pm I can see why those things would be relevant to a full time employee. Thats what I was referring to when I said it's probably a copy/paste.

Thing is, the people volunteering to vaccinate aren't looking for a job in the NHS generally. They want to turn up, jab some people and then go home.
But they’re still jabbing people, full time or not, volunteers or not.
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16740
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10266 times
Been thanked: 6886 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Yorick »

Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
User avatar
wheelnut
Posts: 2229
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Has thanked: 907 times
Been thanked: 1001 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by wheelnut »

Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
Because the digestive system destroys the drug.
slowsider
Posts: 3189
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:45 pm
Location: RoI
Has thanked: 1264 times
Been thanked: 1188 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by slowsider »

Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
There's a suppository version on its way to the Canaries. Fair's fair.
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 16740
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 10266 times
Been thanked: 6886 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Yorick »

wheelnut wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:52 pm
Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
Because the digestive system destroys the drug.
I knew there'd be a simple answer :)
Mr. Dazzle
Posts: 13947
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Has thanked: 2551 times
Been thanked: 6249 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Mr. Dazzle »

Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
The syringes are really hard to swallow, even in a capsule.
Docca
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:09 pm
Has thanked: 666 times
Been thanked: 1163 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Docca »

Mussels wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:48 pm Is it possible that the NHS has had the volunteer idea forced on it and don't really want them involved?
I'm sure if they really did want them the barriers wouldn't be so high.
I doubt it- we’re fucked and need all the little ships we can get afloat on the channel.

I’m 100% confident we can rally and jab everyone, we just need the vaccines. It will likely be a bit messy but this is a position like no other.

Wratty; I agree with most of your post and reckon I’d actually quite enjoy working with you. We’re not too dissimilar ( uh-oh) on a lot of this stuff. On the flu vaccine point though; we don’t do that well either. Not at scale.

We have targets set every year to account how many of our staff have had the jab. It usually runs at around 40%. They’ve ( NHSE) have now included ‘declined’ and ‘had elsewhere’ in the rally totals. This year we are 98% compliant - although with what is unclear. Hit the target though.

The list of stuff you need to give a jab; as @Asmerthurst says- most of that shit is in our stat’ and mandatory training.

I did my radicalisation one a few weeks back and it was almost ‘hey look - that fuzzy-Wuzzy’s backpack is ticking- call the rozzers’. It’s all a bit meh. Aside from the critical life saving stuff.

NHS number vs NI: age and application. We see a lot of folk who are not UK citizens/ transient.

It’s worse than that, and this will boil wratty’s piss- some Trusts use their EPR ( electronic patient record) pas ID as their unique identifier. That’s only relevant to them/that Trust or anyone using that system. So not unique and not transferable or indeed identifiable. We managed to jump on to solely NHS number about 2 years ago- but again, not everyone has one.
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by irie »

Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:10 pm
wheelnut wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:52 pm
Yorick wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm Daft question maybe, but why can't it come in capsule form so can be taken orally?
Because the digestive system destroys the drug.
I knew there'd be a simple answer :)
Take it the traditional French way, up the arse as a suppository. :thumbup:
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
asmethurst99
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:01 pm
Location: The Gate of the Forest
Has thanked: 1042 times
Been thanked: 362 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by asmethurst99 »

Docca wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:37 pm
Mussels wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:48 pm Is it possible that the NHS has had the volunteer idea forced on it and don't really want them involved?
I'm sure if they really did want them the barriers wouldn't be so high.
I doubt it- we’re fucked and need all the little ships we can get afloat on the channel.

I’m 100% confident we can rally and jab everyone, we just need the vaccines. It will likely be a bit messy but this is a position like no other.

Wratty; I agree with most of your post and reckon I’d actually quite enjoy working with you. We’re not too dissimilar ( uh-oh) on a lot of this stuff. On the flu vaccine point though; we don’t do that well either. Not at scale.

We have targets set every year to account how many of our staff have had the jab. It usually runs at around 40%. They’ve ( NHSE) have now included ‘declined’ and ‘had elsewhere’ in the rally totals. This year we are 98% compliant - although with what is unclear. Hit the target though.

The list of stuff you need to give a jab; as @Asmerthurst says- most of that shit is in our stat’ and mandatory training.

I did my radicalisation one a few weeks back and it was almost ‘hey look - that fuzzy-Wuzzy’s backpack is ticking- call the rozzers’. It’s all a bit meh. Aside from the critical life saving stuff.

NHS number vs NI: age and application. We see a lot of folk who are not UK citizens/ transient.

It’s worse than that, and this will boil wratty’s piss- some Trusts use their EPR ( electronic patient record) pas ID as their unique identifier. That’s only relevant to them/that Trust or anyone using that system. So not unique and not transferable or indeed identifiable. We managed to jump on to solely NHS number about 2 years ago- but again, not everyone has one.
As above -IT at our network(group of hospitals not all the same trust ) its not bad because historically it's been well done but other places not so much and ours is ok ish .
I wish I could see some evidence of hurry up
JamJar
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:00 am
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by JamJar »

Not sure if this has been asked before but how long after you’ve had the vaccine are you considered “protected” and does this happen after the first jab or the second one?
User avatar
Dodgy69
Posts: 5457
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Has thanked: 1747 times
Been thanked: 2085 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Dodgy69 »

JamJar wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:07 pm Not sure if this has been asked before but how long after you’ve had the vaccine are you considered “protected” and does this happen after the first jab or the second one?
Don't think your allowed to ask those sort of questions. 😉
Yamaha rocket 3
Docca
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:09 pm
Has thanked: 666 times
Been thanked: 1163 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Docca »

JamJar wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:07 pm Not sure if this has been asked before but how long after you’ve had the vaccine are you considered “protected” and does this happen after the first jab or the second one?
My understanding is that you’re potentially up to 70% protected after first. The second boosts this to 90+
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by irie »

Docca wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:34 pm
JamJar wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:07 pm Not sure if this has been asked before but how long after you’ve had the vaccine are you considered “protected” and does this happen after the first jab or the second one?
My understanding is that you’re potentially up to 70% protected after first. The second boosts this to 90+
I think the below may answer this question.

"CEM CMO 2020 044 JCVI Statement.pdf"

It is on https://www.cas.mhra.gov.uk
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
User avatar
Horse
Posts: 11558
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
Location: Always sunny southern England
Has thanked: 6195 times
Been thanked: 5087 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by Horse »

Docca wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:34 pm
JamJar wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:07 pm Not sure if this has been asked before but how long after you’ve had the vaccine are you considered “protected” and does this happen after the first jab or the second one?
My understanding is that you’re potentially up to 70% protected after first. The second boosts this to 90+
Hence the proposals to substantially extend the interval between first and second jabs, to quickly give 70% for twice as many people.
Even bland can be a type of character :wave:
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Astrazeneca/Oxford vaccine approved

Post by irie »

Looks like the urgency message is getting through ... maybe

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/20 ... ing-covid/
Matt Hancock to cut red tape stopping retired doctors signing up to Covid vaccination drive

Matt Hancock has ordered officials to slash red tape that is putting off retired doctors from signing up to help with the mass Covid inoculation programme ahead of the first jabs of the new British-made vaccine on Monday.

The Telegraph disclosed last week that retired medics had been dissuaded from returning to the NHS front line by bureaucracy including a requirement to provide 21 different pieces of evidence to support their application.

However, Mr Hancock, the Health Secretary has now told officials that he wants the process to be urgently streamlined.

He has ordered a review and made it clear that he intends to cut any red tape to make it as streamlined as possible for retired GPs to help with administering Covid-19 jabs.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno