That's a big old chunked that's been removed. You're a braver man than me.
Top thread by the way. Especially for all us armchair bike fettlers.
That's a big old chunked that's been removed. You're a braver man than me.
yeah - it looks like a big chunk..... and yes - I DID think ... "err wtf".... when I was done!Lutin wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:01 pmThat's a big old chunked that's been removed. You're a braver man than me.
Top thread by the way. Especially for all us armchair bike fettlers.![]()








































I'm keeping with the current theme: That's one giant step for RB, a giant leap for Japton. Keep it going!Rockburner wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 11:52 am So - yesterday I got the opportunity to dive into the workshop...
4 hours of facking about later....
In imperial...
and metric units:
9.3 kilos.... yeah - that's pretty hefty.
I pushed some oil through the big end to clear it out before proceeding:
Then left it to drain for a few minutes
Before starting the iterative process of finding the best mix of shims for an acceptable end-float and conrod centering:
Each trio of photos will be: the measured overall end-float, then conrod vs case centre-line with crank to LEFT, then crank to RIGHT.
one:
two:
three:
four:
six, no five! :
(fecking guage)
That's acceptable and seemed to be as close as I was going to get with the shims I have. Between 0.015 and 0.020 overall end float, and the conrod (allowing for the big-end float as well) is as centred as I can get it.
A sure sign of a troubled mind.....
I've ended up with a very thin shim on one side, and quite a thick combo on the other.
I believe the main reason for this is that the main bearing liners are of different vintages, and protrude into the cases by different amounts (which is the main reason for the adjustable shimming). The old liner in the Timing side case is only slightly proud of the case it fits into (which is the side of the crank-wheel I had to grind down). The new liner I fitted into the output side is much more proud of the case: ie, it has a thicker "brim" (think of it shaped like a top hat); so, to center the conrod, there is less "room" on the output side between the liner and the wheel.
I think I spent about 3 hours on that: each measurement above represents unbolting the cases, pulling out the wheels, pondering the next combo, then reassembling (making sure not to fling bearing pins everywhere), bolting up and resetting the guage. The guage was a bugger to zero each time.
I then restarted the assembly process:
First get the mating faces clean:
Can you get high on meths fumes??
Stick the wheels in with the bearings and shims, then fetch the sealant.
Oh FFS!
Even with having squooged the stuff up and down the tube to try to get it mixed a bit better.. (metal tube - hence the leak above) it still came out very runny. In fact, it literally poured out of the tube (which is why I ended up with slightly more on there than I had planned.)
I cleaned it all up as best I could before it got too sticky
It does make quite a mess....
I can only hope that there isn't too much dribble inside the cases themselves.
Just for shits and giggles I checked the end-float again:
(fecking guage)
Satisfied with that, the end-float is still as I hoped and with luck, the 3Bond will go off properly.
I decided to carry on and fitted the piston again: naturally I scratched hell out of the piston getting the sodding gudgeon pin circlips in:
Then fitted the barrel rods:
To get a good "heft" on the barrel rod nuts I put the whole thing into the vice briefly:
So - we're back on track, if behind schedule slightly...
I left it there for the evening to let the 3Bond go off, and to ponder the next move:
Specifically: do I try the 3Bond on the base gasket again... or use something else: the immediately available options are Hylomar Blue, or silicon RTV. I'm tempted to try the RTV to be frank, mainly because (from memory of last time I used it), it's much, much less runny than the 3Bond, and so easier to be exacting about where it's applied. I don't really want too much of it dribbling into the cases.
So, I went back in and fed the cat:
![]()
Great stuff! A few of the features of my engine are from that world. One my Dad's friends who helped with the original build was an F500 racer.Zimbo wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 2:39 pm Great thread. I help a mate out with his Classic 500 race car, 1953 Cooper 500, powered by the same motor, running on ethanol.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ofQZvnhw2ZqHSw3n7
https://photos.app.goo.gl/n6cJpu1s8fFSWiJ87
That'll be an Amal type 27 most likely... I've been looking for one but they're like hen's teeth (and fucking expensive when they do crop up). The main benefit of them is that they can flow a LOT of fuel into the main jet, which apparently is what the JAP engine likes, regardless of fuel type.Zimbo wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:40 pm Picture was taken after the rear axle drive chain had broken in qualifying at the Silverstone Festival, you can see the rear chain is missing. It runs a Norton gearbox, the rear axle is fixed so you need to adjust the rear drive chain tension by moving the gearbox backwards or forwards, and then adjust the primary drive chain tension by moving the engine backwards or forwards. Interesting carb, two float chambers one either side to maintain fuel delivery under side loads when cornering. As it runs on Methanol it's not that easy to start from cold but OK when warm. It's been reliable apart from some magneto issues in the first season, engine work is done by a specialist if required, we have a spare engine as well. Cars in the class tend to either run the Jap 500 motor or Manx Norton motor.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Y7rkfrCBbRw5A23Y8





































[/url]



























That's very kind of you to say! Tbh, for me, this stuff, while being new to me, is all pretty simple; for me: a bevel drive desmo would be waaaaay too complicated to work on! Getting bevels aligned right would be the stuff of nightmares for me! I've read the workshop manual for my shaft drive BMWs and setting up new bearings and shim for the final drive box is something I'm very happy to hand over to someone who knows what they're doing!Druid wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 10:48 am I have rebuilt a few engines in my time, from twin cam IL4s to bevel drive desmo Ducatis, but this looks to be more challenging than anything I've had to deal with. Well done for even attempting it, I'm really impressed with your work.