I spent a chunk of my life getting qualified in a using industrial psychology. There are many aspects if psychology, the useful ones use large numbers of test results and statistical analysis to derive significant trends from those results
Then there are the ones that just talk to people and call themselves clinical psychologists. If you show X behaviours you get a label. And that shows it isn't your fault, the world has to accept you are different. No need to explain how or why, or even to get some reliable and repeatable stats.
I stand by my term 'psychobabble'.
Horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 5:26 pm
Would you accept evidence of external and physical characteristics such as genitalia?
Would you accept DNA results?
So, presumably, you will also accept physical evidence from brain scans?
You asked 'why'? You might not like the answer, that's your problem.
I asked why we should believe this nonsense. Do you believe this nonsense? Do you believe that a man is a woman if he says he is?
Why is it about what I believe?
- characteristics such as genitalia
- DNA
- brain scans
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you’ve given me the impression that you believe men who pretend to be women are something more than (or other than) men who pretend to be women.
Cousin Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:16 pm
I spent a chunk of my life getting qualified in a using industrial psychology. There are many aspects if psychology, the useful ones use large numbers of test results and statistical analysis to derive significant trends from those results
Then there are the ones that just talk to people and call themselves clinical psychologists
I stand by my term 'psychobabble'.
Presumably the brain scan stuff doesn't rely on asking the brain questions, so fits into the first category?
PS I spent over 15 years working with psychologists, so understand the distinction. For research involving the first, I would design experiments and stattos would specify sample sizes to achieve significant results. And one survey I ran on a target group of, in total, about 1500 people received 600 submissions, so was reasonably representative of those with strong beliefs.
JackyJoll wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:34 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you’ve given me the impression that you believe men who pretend to be women are something more than (or other than) men who pretend to be women.
Pretend? How does a brain 'pretend' during a scan?
As above: Why is it about what I believe? It's not.
JackyJoll wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:34 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you’ve given me the impression that you believe men who pretend to be women are something more than (or other than) men who pretend to be women.
Pretend? How does a brain 'pretend' during a scan?
As above: Why is it about what I believe? It's not.
Saga Lout wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 7:25 pm
I asked why we should believe this nonsense. Do you believe this nonsense? Do you believe that a man is a woman if he says he is?
Why is it about what I believe?
Because I'd like to know whether I'm having a discussion with a true believer or somebody playing Devil's advocate.
So, Do you believe a man in a dress is a woman if he says he's a woman?
Do you believe I have a full head of hair and I'm not a bald man in a wig if I say I have a full head of hair?
And if you believe one but not the other, why?
JackyJoll wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:34 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you’ve given me the impression that you believe men who pretend to be women are something more than (or other than) men who pretend to be women.
Pretend? How does a brain 'pretend' during a scan?
As above: Why is it about what I believe? It's not.
I’ve been assuming you post what you believe.
I was posting answers to CJ and SL. I was assuming you understood that.
So, getting away from me, how does a brain 'pretend'?
Saga Lout wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:16 pm
Because I'd like to know whether I'm having a discussion with a true believer or somebody playing Devil's advocate.
Well, you should have included that qualifier in the original post.
But you didn't, you asked for evidence. You just don't like the answer, so are attempting to make it about me instead, rather than acknowledge that there are brain scans that support something you dislike / disbelieve / ridicule.
Using the "Devil's Advocate" idea is irrelevant. There's evidence, accept it or challenge it.
Would it be a good idea to do what I suggested? Proper research with statistically valid results, to find out WHY significant numbers of people want to pretend/adopt/become something different from what their DNA say?