To be clear, are you saying that paedophilia is predominantly committed by non-white people?
Edit: some here would complain about me selective quoting, but I've kept the text you bolded
To be clear, are you saying that paedophilia is predominantly committed by non-white people?
Screwdriver wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:07 pmThere was (and still is) a well known troublemaker at school. A young thug who liked to pick on girls. The list of things he was “ let off for” is insane. Beatings, stabbings(!) you name it.MyLittleStudPony wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:04 pm Oh noez, Good old Tommy's been sent to prison for 18 months!
They say he was racist, but all he wanted to do was have people treated differently, depending on what country they were from (or if they were Islamics). In the belief that would somehow be better for him and other English whites. What could possible be racist about that?
They should put all the Wokerys in prison for trying to ensure minorities have rights.
Free Good Old Tommy! He was nice and Brexity!
He went too far and threatened to rape a 9 year old girl. Her bigger brother stopped our young thug and had the rule book thrown at him. Their family, not the young thug, has been vilified and punished severely.
Tommy is “guilty” of revealing the truth about the thug by supporting a film about the affair. So his crime is contempt of court because the court has decided to try and hide the full story from the public.
One of the issues is that ICE cars will only (normally) catch fire when you’re using them. If an EV catches fire it can be when it’s charging, you’re not in them, and when it’s likely to be sat next to your house while you’re asleep.Horse wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:17 pmWould some facts help?
"With data corroborated from a US insurer, the study found that EVs suffer 25 fires per 100,000 sold. Petrol or diesel vehicles were found to experience 1,530 fires per 100,000, with hybrid vehicles at a notably higher risk of 3,475 fires per 100,000."
https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/tusker ... t-ev-fires
After the Depp/Heard libel case I don't think truth matters much any more.demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 amScrewdriver wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:07 pmThere was (and still is) a well known troublemaker at school. A young thug who liked to pick on girls. The list of things he was “ let off for” is insane. Beatings, stabbings(!) you name it.MyLittleStudPony wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:04 pm Oh noez, Good old Tommy's been sent to prison for 18 months!
They say he was racist, but all he wanted to do was have people treated differently, depending on what country they were from (or if they were Islamics). In the belief that would somehow be better for him and other English whites. What could possible be racist about that?
They should put all the Wokerys in prison for trying to ensure minorities have rights.
Free Good Old Tommy! He was nice and Brexity!
He went too far and threatened to rape a 9 year old girl. Her bigger brother stopped our young thug and had the rule book thrown at him. Their family, not the young thug, has been vilified and punished severely.
Tommy is “guilty” of revealing the truth about the thug by supporting a film about the affair. So his crime is contempt of court because the court has decided to try and hide the full story from the public.
Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
Good to see Screwd yet again spouting 3rd hand news, not fact checks, and from dubious sources. Once again, no reserach into the said topic other than spouting the rhetoric of his Ayrian Brothers. Dear me ...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 amScrewdriver wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:07 pmThere was (and still is) a well known troublemaker at school. A young thug who liked to pick on girls. The list of things he was “ let off for” is insane. Beatings, stabbings(!) you name it.MyLittleStudPony wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:04 pm Oh noez, Good old Tommy's been sent to prison for 18 months!
They say he was racist, but all he wanted to do was have people treated differently, depending on what country they were from (or if they were Islamics). In the belief that would somehow be better for him and other English whites. What could possible be racist about that?
They should put all the Wokerys in prison for trying to ensure minorities have rights.
Free Good Old Tommy! He was nice and Brexity!
He went too far and threatened to rape a 9 year old girl. Her bigger brother stopped our young thug and had the rule book thrown at him. Their family, not the young thug, has been vilified and punished severely.
Tommy is “guilty” of revealing the truth about the thug by supporting a film about the affair. So his crime is contempt of court because the court has decided to try and hide the full story from the public.
Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
Who are the fact checkers and what's their bias?Mr Moofo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:37 amGood to see Screwd yet again spouting 3rd hand news, not fact checks, and from dubious sources. Once again, no reserach into the said topic other than spouting the rhetoric of his Ayrian Brothers. Dear me ...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 amScrewdriver wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:07 pm
There was (and still is) a well known troublemaker at school. A young thug who liked to pick on girls. The list of things he was “ let off for” is insane. Beatings, stabbings(!) you name it.
He went too far and threatened to rape a 9 year old girl. Her bigger brother stopped our young thug and had the rule book thrown at him. Their family, not the young thug, has been vilified and punished severely.
Tommy is “guilty” of revealing the truth about the thug by supporting a film about the affair. So his crime is contempt of court because the court has decided to try and hide the full story from the public.
Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
From the same report:Horse wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:17 pmWould some facts help?
"With data corroborated from a US insurer, the study found that EVs suffer 25 fires per 100,000 sold. Petrol or diesel vehicles were found to experience 1,530 fires per 100,000, with hybrid vehicles at a notably higher risk of 3,475 fires per 100,000."
https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/tusker ... t-ev-fires
10 seconds from smoke to inferno vs 10 minutes from smoke to inferno. I know which one I'd prefer to try to escape from.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:58 pm You'd have to define "dangerous" first
Burned to death a lot vs burned to death just a little bit?
Car written off vs car written off and house destroyed.
English court of law decided that Staven Yaxley Lennon had libelled the child by spreading lies about him, they told Yaxley Lennon to desist and he didnt.Taipan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:07 pmWho are the fact checkers and what's their bias?Mr Moofo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:37 amGood to see Screwd yet again spouting 3rd hand news, not fact checks, and from dubious sources. Once again, no reserach into the said topic other than spouting the rhetoric of his Ayrian Brothers. Dear me ...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 am
Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:07 pm10 seconds from smoke to inferno vs 10 minutes from smoke to inferno. I know which one I'd prefer to try to escape from.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:58 pm You'd have to define "dangerous" first
Burned to death a lot vs burned to death just a little bit?
When I was a teenager a car got nicked, driven round the back of the lo al Spar shop a d torched.
I remember hearing the exosion when the tank went and saw what was left afterwards.
Pretty sure the garage and house would have been wrecked in that situation as well.
Car written off vs car written off and house destroyed.
I think most people can agree that EV fires are more dangerous, the question, as I said, is how much more dangerous?
When I was a teenager a car got nicked, driven round the back of the lo al Spar shop a d torched.Saga Lout wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:07 pm10 seconds from smoke to inferno vs 10 minutes from smoke to inferno. I know which one I'd prefer to try to escape from.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:58 pm You'd have to define "dangerous" first
Burned to death a lot vs burned to death just a little bit?
Car written off vs car written off and house destroyed.
I think most people can agree that EV fires are more dangerous, the question, as I said, is how much more dangerous?
I don't find it funny in the slightest. Clearly there is a campaign being waged around the prevalence of crimes committed by recent immigrants. Seems to be a huge albeit circumstantial amount of evidence that such "crimes" are being buried, not reported or outright censored. A HUGE number of such stories circulating, including the Southport murders in which further evidence suggests the murderer wasn't the innocent Christian schoolboy the mainstream media insist. Kinda weird to have to say that about a child murderer but here were are...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 am Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
It's called "reading more than one media source" and unfortunately you have to do it yourselfTaipan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:07 pmWho are the fact checkers and what's their bias?Mr Moofo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:37 amGood to see Screwd yet again spouting 3rd hand news, not fact checks, and from dubious sources. Once again, no reserach into the said topic other than spouting the rhetoric of his Ayrian Brothers. Dear me ...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 am
Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
Is it because the WEF want to replace pizza with children?Screwdriver wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:56 pmI don't find it funny in the slightest. Clearly there is a campaign being waged around the prevalence of crimes committed by recent immigrants. Seems to be a huge albeit circumstantial amount of evidence that such "crimes" are being buried, not reported or outright censored. A HUGE number of such stories circulating, including the Southport murders in which further evidence suggests the murderer wasn't the innocent Christian schoolboy the mainstream media insist. Kinda weird to have to say that about a child murderer but here were are...demographic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 5:53 am Funny but this kind of tells a slightly different tale.
Plus its already been to court and tiny TommyYaxley Lennon was found to be committing libel, do you think that by repeating libel as fact that you're not?
Theres a better article and I'll ratch it out out this should do for now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almondb ... g_incident
Back to the plot. So there are many stories about this thug, reports from other children, an ex-teacher from that school. Incidents around fights, stabbings, beatings (during which our thug broke his arm when he was pulled off a 9 year old), a random girl being hit for no reason with a hockey stick. Etc. etc.
So why would a judge decide all these people are lying? Well one example is a girl who alleges she was assaulted by this thug, albeit not on school premises. Later she says it was "by the back gate" (of the school). That's not good enough for our judge who dismisses the incident on the grounds that the story has "changed". Remembering this is a little girl who is the witness. Plus of course, nothing is reported to the school or at least, no report has been recorded by the school.
I have some experience of such matters. When I was a trainee teacher I had to take a knife away from a well known thug at my school. I almost got into trouble for it myself! Obviously I had to account for it with the head but no further action was taken and no report was made. Like it never happened.
And that is the crux of this matter. Same goes for the hockey stick attack. No report made. Everyone knew about it at the time, there are plenty of stories about parents being paid to keep quiet, plenty of independent witnesses (since in any school we all know who the troublemakers are) and in every case, no documented report made by the school.
So the judge decided the children were not good witnesses and can be ignored, there was no formal report on file at the school therefore it didn't happen. This nasty little thug is laughing all the way to the bank. Won't be the end of the matter since I bet my bottom dollar this same thug who now believes he is untouchable will cross a line and eventually be held accountable. I just hope it's nothing too serious....
The transcript from that court case is easily available for anyone who doesn't just swallow the "party line" hook line and sinker.
Can you post the link?Screwdriver wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:43 pmThe transcript from that court case is easily available for anyone who doesn't just swallow the "party line" hook line and sinker.