The Official Watch Thread.
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
I always assumed Ray Winstone's character in Sexy Beast was based on Tiepin.
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11805
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6376 times
- Been thanked: 4751 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
- Taipan
- Posts: 13945
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15949 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Nah he’s slimmer and better spoken!KungFooBob wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:59 pm I always assumed Ray Winstone's character in Sexy Beast was based on Tiepin.
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Have you been watching Kaos on Netflix? (Worth a watch - no pun intended)
- Taipan
- Posts: 13945
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15949 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
See I was thinking cuban collared shirts but it also suits a tracky equally!
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
More of a shell suit thing IMO.Taipan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:59 amSee I was thinking cuban collared shirts but it also suits a tracky equally!
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!
-
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1722 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
I keep toying with the idea of modding a Seiko (possibly using a NH35 movement) and a titanium case (I'm just not impressed by heavy watches with metal bracelets) and maybe a dive watch style just cos I like a clear face (pilots watch being another option.
I'm not dead set on the Seiko movement as theres an ETA one with pretty common parts avaliable but its the frontrunner just for the choices it gives.
Titanium case being 60-90 quid, a face and hands being cheap enough as I really couldn't give a flying fuck about non standard parts other than the movement.
To be fair, I'm actually quite happy with my Casio MDV-106 since I got rid of the original scratched and broken mineral glass and put a "Sapphire"* glass in. Thats been in the watch for well over a year of proper scratchy site work and theres not a single scratch on it despite the rest of the watch being as scabbled as feck.
I would say that if anyone bas a mineral glass on their watch that a genuine upgrade is a sapphire glass. Think mine was only 20 quid and wasnt even that hard to fit either once I bought a cheapo press.
In terms of accuracy a mechanical movement is a definite downgrade compared to a quartz movement but I quite like tinkering so I might give it a bash.
*Synthetic sapphire but its basically the same stuff as a ruby as well but sapphire sounds posher innit, dunno why, its a real corundum to me
I'm not dead set on the Seiko movement as theres an ETA one with pretty common parts avaliable but its the frontrunner just for the choices it gives.
Titanium case being 60-90 quid, a face and hands being cheap enough as I really couldn't give a flying fuck about non standard parts other than the movement.
To be fair, I'm actually quite happy with my Casio MDV-106 since I got rid of the original scratched and broken mineral glass and put a "Sapphire"* glass in. Thats been in the watch for well over a year of proper scratchy site work and theres not a single scratch on it despite the rest of the watch being as scabbled as feck.
I would say that if anyone bas a mineral glass on their watch that a genuine upgrade is a sapphire glass. Think mine was only 20 quid and wasnt even that hard to fit either once I bought a cheapo press.
In terms of accuracy a mechanical movement is a definite downgrade compared to a quartz movement but I quite like tinkering so I might give it a bash.
*Synthetic sapphire but its basically the same stuff as a ruby as well but sapphire sounds posher innit, dunno why, its a real corundum to me
- MrLongbeard
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
- Has thanked: 599 times
- Been thanked: 2436 times
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
My daily wear is a Seiko Kinetic with a titanium case. It is scratched to hell, titanium is tough but it doesn't seem very scratch resistant.demographic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 10:15 pm I keep toying with the idea of modding a Seiko (possibly using a NH35 movement) and a titanium case (I'm just not impressed by heavy watches with metal bracelets) and maybe a dive watch style just cos I like a clear face (pilots watch being another option.
I'm not dead set on the Seiko movement as theres an ETA one with pretty common parts avaliable but its the frontrunner just for the choices it gives.
Titanium case being 60-90 quid, a face and hands being cheap enough as I really couldn't give a flying fuck about non standard parts other than the movement.
To be fair, I'm actually quite happy with my Casio MDV-106 since I got rid of the original scratched and broken mineral glass and put a "Sapphire"* glass in. Thats been in the watch for well over a year of proper scratchy site work and theres not a single scratch on it despite the rest of the watch being as scabbled as feck.
I would say that if anyone bas a mineral glass on their watch that a genuine upgrade is a sapphire glass. Think mine was only 20 quid and wasnt even that hard to fit either once I bought a cheapo press.
In terms of accuracy a mechanical movement is a definite downgrade compared to a quartz movement but I quite like tinkering so I might give it a bash.
*Synthetic sapphire but its basically the same stuff as a ruby as well but sapphire sounds posher innit, dunno why, its a real corundum to me
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!
-
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 6244 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Common misconception...if you want something strong and tough get steel, it trumps titanium is almost every regard that way.
Titanium is light. And very hypoallergenic, which is good in the context of jewellery.
Titanium is light. And very hypoallergenic, which is good in the context of jewellery.
-
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1722 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:49 pm Common misconception...if you want something strong and tough get steel, it trumps titanium is almost every regard that way.
Titanium is light. And very hypoallergenic, which is good in the context of jewellery.
Aye, not fussed about the case being scabbled a bit, it's more that the ones with a stainless case kind of turn themselves around on my wrist due to the case weight.
Never been blown away by that "Reassuring weight" bullshite.
Plus I already have a Lorus (Loris? Can't remember) with a Ti case and I value a sapphire crystal waaaaaaay above the supposed increased scratch resistance of stainless steel over Ti. Case scratch? DGAF, but a scratch on the crystal really gets on my fucking nerves and I would in general recommend that anyone with the chance spend the 20 or so off Ebay quid and replace their mineral glass with a far and away more scratch resistant sapphire (its actually Corundum which is also Ruby and Ihad some in my mineral specimen cabinet when I was a kid) crystal. It genuinely urinates over "Mineral Glass" from a great height, although to be fair I've not depth tested it. Fuckload more scratch resistant though, for sure.
I've worked metal (before becoming a woodbutcher) for long enough that in general I have a fairly good idea of their properties
-
- Posts: 13937
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2550 times
- Been thanked: 6244 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
It still amuses me that people value ruby and sapphire when you can cook it up in a factory.
In the science museum they've got a (mam made) phone book sized lump of "sapphire" which is part of a lens. The only thing which makes it blue or red is a little bit of impurity.
P.S. try having an Omega watch with a plastic 'glass'
In the science museum they've got a (mam made) phone book sized lump of "sapphire" which is part of a lens. The only thing which makes it blue or red is a little bit of impurity.
P.S. try having an Omega watch with a plastic 'glass'
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 907 times
- Been thanked: 1001 times
-
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1722 times
Re: The Official Watch Thread.
Aye, that "Sapphire" crystal I pressed onto my Casio cost a grand total of 20 quid for something 30 something mm in diameter and 2.7 mm thick.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2024 7:51 am It still amuses me that people value ruby and sapphire when you can cook it up in a factory.
In the science museum they've got a (mam made) phone book sized lump of "sapphire" which is part of a lens. The only thing which makes it blue or red is a little bit of impurity.
P.S. try having an Omega watch with a plastic 'glass'
The watch itself is scabbled to feck, thats fine by me and reflects the fact that I wear it everyday and my work isn't gentle on watches.
The crystal however is just as perfect as the day I pressed it in as far as I can see.
The original mineral crystal was scratched with a week and not long after that it cracked while I was lifting a large timber frame and the watch face was against the frame on the inner of my wrist.
I'm not suggesting that the sapphire crystal wouldn't have cracked lifting that frame, I honestly don't know but it's much much better material for my usage.
For actually diving? Dunno, deepest I'm going is a few feet when swimming in Ullswater.
Placky crystal may well be better for proper depths, I just don't care about that.