In todays news...
- gremlin
- Posts: 5694
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 776 times
- Been thanked: 4587 times
Re: In todays news...
I dare say there isn't a PM in history who hasn't sat down at the end of the day and thought, 'Fuck me...it was a lot fucking easier in opposition'.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- Taipan
- Posts: 13420
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15453 times
- Been thanked: 9956 times
Re: In todays news...
Indeed. Not getting much sport with my labour voting colleagues either as they seem more pissed off about Free Gear Keir and Racheal Thieves than I do!Mussels wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pmThat's what I was thinking of more than speculation on X. The hypocracy of him, Rayner and Reeves is clear. They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
- gremlin
- Posts: 5694
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 776 times
- Been thanked: 4587 times
Re: In todays news...
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.
Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
Last edited by gremlin on Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
- MrLongbeard
- Posts: 4421
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
- Has thanked: 583 times
- Been thanked: 2331 times
Re: In todays news...
We have the same level of fun sucking here, long long gone are the days of bottles of wine & whiskey at chrimbogremlin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pmI have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (any by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.
Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
- Noggin
- Posts: 7769
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 15718 times
- Been thanked: 3784 times
Re: In todays news...
Because the main reason most (not all) become MPs is the gravy train and the publicity; the second generally equates to money in the endgremlin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pmI have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (any by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.
Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
Sux but in general if that’s not why they go into politics, it seems most can be swayed once there
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
- Mr Moofo
- Posts: 4470
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:41 pm
- Location: Brightonish
- Has thanked: 1773 times
- Been thanked: 1419 times
Re: In todays news...
When I worked I was in the same position - it was very clear what could be paid for / what couldn't. And any gifts had to be of really low value. Certainly different if you went to Africa or the Middle East, but that's why companies use agents.gremlin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pmI have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.
Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
But clothing allowances, free holidays, free use of accommodation, money as contributions would have all been seen as corruption.
I am not sure how politicians differ?
https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/effe ... in-the-uk/
Collins English Dictionary defines corruption as “dishonesty and illegal behaviour by people in positions of authority or power”. Transparency International, a charity which describes itself as a “global coalition against corruption” concurs, defining corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain”. It highlights a range of examples of corruption, such as: public servants demanding or taking money or favours in exchange for services; politicians misusing public money or granting public contacts to their sponsors, friends and families; and corporations bribing officials to get lucrative deals.
What is corruption and bribery?
The government defines corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private benefit that usually breaches laws, regulations, standards of integrity or standards of professional behaviour.
This can include:
abuse of the power given to an individual by another person or organisation
activity that’s beyond the position or remit of a person
benefits taken for an employee’s personal gain, rather than for their organisation
Bribery is defined as the offering, promising, or giving of something to influence an official, including:
payments to get a faster or better service or to gain advantage in public procurement processes
offering, providing or receiving gifts, entertainment, and hospitality – or other items of value such as donations, sponsorships and internships
levels of hospitality disproportionate to a business transaction
Your company’s exposure to these may vary from one country to another. But you should always keep your eyes open for the warning signs.
- Taipan
- Posts: 13420
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15453 times
- Been thanked: 9956 times
Re: In todays news...
Because they are a load of janus faced, duplicitous, trough feeding, self serving wankers! As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking!gremlin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pmI have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.
Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 2102 times
Re: In todays news...
Like paying taxes, it's the overwhelming majority of middle-class, middle-income masses who have to play by rules. My BIL, a builder, says that in his line of work favours for kindness given, contracts awarded etc is commonplace in the form of freebies and cashback.
-
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 1247 times
Re: In todays news...
Of course, politicians aren’t Government employees. I expect that makes a difference.
Re: In todays news...
Unless I was extremely hard up, I don't think I'd ever accept if someone offered to buy my glasses for me, be that family or friends, let alone some random business contact. Even then I wouldn't have the cheek to get a pair for £2400.
Holidays, meals and jollies, I can understand*, but his n' hers clothes and glasses. Nope.
* I'm not saying it's right though, 'cos it's not.
Holidays, meals and jollies, I can understand*, but his n' hers clothes and glasses. Nope.
* I'm not saying it's right though, 'cos it's not.
- Noggin
- Posts: 7769
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
- Location: Ski Resort
- Has thanked: 15718 times
- Been thanked: 3784 times
Re: In todays news...
Maybe they should be held to the same standards? Might get rid of some of the gravy boat paddlers?
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!!
-
- Posts: 1092
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:28 pm
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
Re: In todays news...
Political parties are different to companies, large corporations and tooley goons; they are legitimately funded by donations.
I worked for a few corporate multinationals which were very tight on 'bribery and corruption'. Mainly as very high value contracts were part of the game.
I worked for a few corporate multinationals which were very tight on 'bribery and corruption'. Mainly as very high value contracts were part of the game.
Re: In todays news...
Parties should be funded by donations and then those funds disseminated to the party members that need them for work purposes, not tickets to Taylor Swift or Arsenal private boxes. That's my view of it.
- Mr Moofo
- Posts: 4470
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:41 pm
- Location: Brightonish
- Has thanked: 1773 times
- Been thanked: 1419 times
Re: In todays news...
Which is fine - but then this funds should be used for political purposes. Not frocks and posh glasses framesMyLittleStudPony wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 5:03 pm Political parties are different to companies, large corporations and tooley goons; they are legitimately funded by donations.
.
Or very expensive wall paper for No 11
-
- Posts: 4773
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:51 am
- Been thanked: 2549 times
-
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1328 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: In todays news...
Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from.
- Count Steer
- Posts: 11500
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 6234 times
- Been thanked: 4641 times
Re: In todays news...
Include wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers.demographic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
But certainty is an absurd one.
Voltaire
- Taipan
- Posts: 13420
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
- Location: Essex Riviera!
- Has thanked: 15453 times
- Been thanked: 9956 times
Re: In todays news...
But your only allowed to read the first 10 paragaphs...Count Steer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:53 pmInclude wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers.demographic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from.
https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/09/1 ... an-any-mp/
-
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
- Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
- Has thanked: 1328 times
- Been thanked: 1671 times
Re: In todays news...
Count Steer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:53 pmInclude wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers.demographic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from.
The flat refurbishment
One of the first scandals Johnson faced was an allegation of corruption after WhatsApp messages revealed he had asked a Conservative Party donor for funds to refurbish his Downing Street residence. British news outlets reported that the work cost around £200,000 ($280,000).
Political donations and loans are tightly controlled in the United Kingdom, with loans of more than £7,500 ($10,400) logged and publicly revealed by the commission four times a year.
Johnson did not report the donations and as a result, the Conservative Party was fined £17,800 by the Electoral Commission in December last year.
- Cousin Jack
- Posts: 4318
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Location: Down in the Duchy
- Has thanked: 2474 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
Re: In todays news...
I'm not an employee, I an a volunteer Trustee of a MAT. I still have to declare any gifts or hospitality and all directorship of myself and my close family.
The Govt is quick enough to make sure everyone else is squeaky clean, time they were held to account for their failings.
Cornish Tart #1
Remember An Gof!
Remember An Gof!