In todays news...

Current affairs, Politics, News.
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5694
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 776 times
Been thanked: 4587 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by gremlin »

I dare say there isn't a PM in history who hasn't sat down at the end of the day and thought, 'Fuck me...it was a lot fucking easier in opposition'.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13420
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15453 times
Been thanked: 9956 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Taipan »

Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm
Taipan wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:57 pm Tis the ying/yang of politics for sure, but there is many a Labour voter and trade union beyond angry at the winter fuel issue and they are bigger critics than the Tories!
That's what I was thinking of more than speculation on X. The hypocracy of him, Rayner and Reeves is clear. They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
Indeed. Not getting much sport with my labour voting colleagues either as they seem more pissed off about Free Gear Keir and Racheal Thieves than I do! :D
User avatar
gremlin
Posts: 5694
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
Has thanked: 776 times
Been thanked: 4587 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by gremlin »

Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.

Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
Last edited by gremlin on Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All aboard the Peckham Pigeon! All aboard!
User avatar
MrLongbeard
Posts: 4421
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
Has thanked: 583 times
Been thanked: 2331 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by MrLongbeard »

gremlin wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pm
Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (any by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.

Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
We have the same level of fun sucking here, long long gone are the days of bottles of wine & whiskey at chrimbo :angry-cussingblack:
User avatar
Noggin
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
Location: Ski Resort
Has thanked: 15718 times
Been thanked: 3784 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Noggin »

gremlin wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pm
Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (any by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.

Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
Because the main reason most (not all) become MPs is the gravy train and the publicity; the second generally equates to money in the end

Sux but in general if that’s not why they go into politics, it seems most can be swayed once there 😞😞😞
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!! :bblonde:
User avatar
Mr Moofo
Posts: 4470
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:41 pm
Location: Brightonish
Has thanked: 1773 times
Been thanked: 1419 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Mr Moofo »

gremlin wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pm
Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.

Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
When I worked I was in the same position - it was very clear what could be paid for / what couldn't. And any gifts had to be of really low value. Certainly different if you went to Africa or the Middle East, but that's why companies use agents.
But clothing allowances, free holidays, free use of accommodation, money as contributions would have all been seen as corruption.

I am not sure how politicians differ?

https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/effe ... in-the-uk/

Collins English Dictionary defines corruption as “dishonesty and illegal behaviour by people in positions of authority or power”. Transparency International, a charity which describes itself as a “global coalition against corruption” concurs, defining corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain”. It highlights a range of examples of corruption, such as: public servants demanding or taking money or favours in exchange for services; politicians misusing public money or granting public contacts to their sponsors, friends and families; and corporations bribing officials to get lucrative deals.

What is corruption and bribery?

The government defines corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private benefit that usually breaches laws, regulations, standards of integrity or standards of professional behaviour.

This can include:

abuse of the power given to an individual by another person or organisation
activity that’s beyond the position or remit of a person
benefits taken for an employee’s personal gain, rather than for their organisation
Bribery is defined as the offering, promising, or giving of something to influence an official, including:

payments to get a faster or better service or to gain advantage in public procurement processes
offering, providing or receiving gifts, entertainment, and hospitality – or other items of value such as donations, sponsorships and internships
levels of hospitality disproportionate to a business transaction
Your company’s exposure to these may vary from one country to another. But you should always keep your eyes open for the warning signs.
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13420
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15453 times
Been thanked: 9956 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Taipan »

gremlin wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:00 pm
Mussels wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm They have been receiving gifts that any private company would call bribery, both for the person on the receiving and and those donating to politically exposed persons.
I have to complete an online assessment every year on 'Bribery and Corruption', amongst many, many others. Takes about an hour, and it's mandatory, else I forfeit my job. It makes it quite clear that I should not accept excessive gifts (and by 'excessive' I mean anything more than a branded notepad or pen (not both, mind!)). If I meet somebody on a professional level for coffee, I have to pay and claim, lest I be in their debt and open to coercion. Lunch? Not a chance. I pay and justify why the expense was needed and to ensure that it's not me being excessively lavish.

Holiday homes? Free designer clothes? FFS, I'd be out on my ear for even entering into a conversation on the subject. I know this, because I'm educated on what is acceptable and what isn't. I know the boundaries. Why is it so difficult for Westminster to grasp this very basic level of acceptable behaviour?
Because they are a load of janus faced, duplicitous, trough feeding, self serving wankers! As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking! :crazy:
User avatar
DefTrap
Posts: 4366
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
Has thanked: 2200 times
Been thanked: 2102 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by DefTrap »

Like paying taxes, it's the overwhelming majority of middle-class, middle-income masses who have to play by rules. My BIL, a builder, says that in his line of work favours for kindness given, contracts awarded etc is commonplace in the form of freebies and cashback.
JackyJoll
Posts: 3674
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 1247 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by JackyJoll »

Of course, politicians aren’t Government employees. I expect that makes a difference.
User avatar
McNab
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:07 pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 172 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by McNab »

Unless I was extremely hard up, I don't think I'd ever accept if someone offered to buy my glasses for me, be that family or friends, let alone some random business contact. Even then I wouldn't have the cheek to get a pair for £2400.

Holidays, meals and jollies, I can understand*, but his n' hers clothes and glasses. Nope.

* I'm not saying it's right though, 'cos it's not.
User avatar
Noggin
Posts: 7769
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
Location: Ski Resort
Has thanked: 15718 times
Been thanked: 3784 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Noggin »

JackyJoll wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:34 pm Of course, politicians aren’t Government employees. I expect that makes a difference.
Maybe they should be held to the same standards? Might get rid of some of the gravy boat paddlers?
Life is for living. Buy the shoes. Eat the cake. Ride the bikes. Just, ride the bikes!! :bblonde:
MyLittleStudPony
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:28 pm
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by MyLittleStudPony »

Political parties are different to companies, large corporations and tooley goons; they are legitimately funded by donations.

I worked for a few corporate multinationals which were very tight on 'bribery and corruption'. Mainly as very high value contracts were part of the game.
User avatar
McNab
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:07 pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 172 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by McNab »

Parties should be funded by donations and then those funds disseminated to the party members that need them for work purposes, not tickets to Taylor Swift or Arsenal private boxes. That's my view of it.
User avatar
Mr Moofo
Posts: 4470
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:41 pm
Location: Brightonish
Has thanked: 1773 times
Been thanked: 1419 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Mr Moofo »

MyLittleStudPony wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 5:03 pm Political parties are different to companies, large corporations and tooley goons; they are legitimately funded by donations.

.
Which is fine - but then this funds should be used for political purposes. Not frocks and posh glasses frames
Or very expensive wall paper for No 11
cheb
Posts: 4773
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:51 am
Been thanked: 2549 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by cheb »

Are motorhomes OK? Asking for a Scottish friend.
demographic
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
Has thanked: 1328 times
Been thanked: 1671 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by demographic »

Taipan wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:04 pm As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking! :crazy:

Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from. :eh:
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 6234 times
Been thanked: 4641 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Count Steer »

demographic wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Taipan wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:04 pm As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking! :crazy:

Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from. :eh:
Include wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers. :thumbup:
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one
.
Voltaire
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13420
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15453 times
Been thanked: 9956 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Taipan »

Count Steer wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:53 pm
demographic wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Taipan wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:04 pm As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking! :crazy:

Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from. :eh:
Include wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers. :thumbup:
But your only allowed to read the first 10 paragaphs... :?

https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/09/1 ... an-any-mp/
demographic
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
Has thanked: 1328 times
Been thanked: 1671 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by demographic »

Count Steer wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:53 pm
demographic wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 6:46 pm
Taipan wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:04 pm As PMs go, it does seem Starmer has overtaken BoJo in the freebies ranking! :crazy:

Haha, you're unintentionally funny.
As much as I'm loath to excuse politicians getting free gifts it's not even close.
Please show your working to explain where you picked that idea from. :eh:
Include wallpaper and PPE contracts in your answers. :thumbup:

The flat refurbishment
One of the first scandals Johnson faced was an allegation of corruption after WhatsApp messages revealed he had asked a Conservative Party donor for funds to refurbish his Downing Street residence. British news outlets reported that the work cost around £200,000 ($280,000).

Political donations and loans are tightly controlled in the United Kingdom, with loans of more than £7,500 ($10,400) logged and publicly revealed by the commission four times a year.

Johnson did not report the donations and as a result, the Conservative Party was fined £17,800 by the Electoral Commission in December last year.
User avatar
Cousin Jack
Posts: 4318
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Location: Down in the Duchy
Has thanked: 2474 times
Been thanked: 2201 times

Re: In todays news...

Post by Cousin Jack »

JackyJoll wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:34 pm Of course, politicians aren’t Government employees. I expect that makes a difference.
I'm not an employee, I an a volunteer Trustee of a MAT. I still have to declare any gifts or hospitality and all directorship of myself and my close family.

The Govt is quick enough to make sure everyone else is squeaky clean, time they were held to account for their failings.
Cornish Tart #1

Remember An Gof!