There's no need to keep telling me I'm right, from now on we'll assume it.demographic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:19 pmBy Jove yer right old bean...Screwdriver wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:43 pmWho is the convicted rapist??demographic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 9:38 pm So, how are you with the convicted rapist and Epstien buddy part?
So you were talking about Trump who is in fact, not a convicted rapist.
It's not something I would make a joke about either.
Instead let's concentrate of the facts.
This alleged incident took place more than 20 years ago. Did the alleged victim report anything at the time (incidentally, I am going to be really annoying and ask rhetorical questions - the answer is obviously no). So if there is no crime reported; were there any witnesses? Again no. Were there any contemporary reports of this alleged attack being reported to any of her friends - no again.
Is there any evidence whatsoever? A date perhaps (not a window of opportunity). Is there any proof at all that either of the two parties were in the same general location at around the same general period in history? Nope. The case looks a bit weak tbh.
On top of that, surely this is well past it's sell by date. I mean twenty years ago, the trail has gone cold. Isn't there a statute of limitations which applies to historical allegations?
Oh yeah, hang on, those restrictions were lifted for some unspecified reason during the "me too" movement. So the law was changed and on the very day when the law was changed to allow alleged victims to sue the alleged perpetrator, was anyone 'ready to go"?
Yeah. Just one. Guess who...
Then apart from the rather obvious weaponisation of the justice system a.k.a. "get Trump", what do we know about the alleged victim?
Well, she is a fucking lunatic. Ohh you can't say that! That'll be $85,000,000 for being mean (to a lunatic).
Be honest with yourself, you know this woman is batshit crazy. If you can't see that, you're obviously not looking.