This time next year, President Trump moves back into the Whitehouse...

[ZRX61]

In a MILF sort of view, she was quite cute in her earlier days

Hence the career advancement from sucking Willie Brown's brown willy.

[ZRX61]

Biden had another *moment* while waiting for the released prisoners to land at Andrews AFB. Switched off & just stood there like a fucking statue... & the media had to show it because he was next to Harris who was flapping her dick holster to the press.

[Screwdriver]

You know at least half the shit you’re reading on twitter is Russian and Chinese bot farms don’t you?

Half? More like 99% of anything online will be unsubstantiated garbage, propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation (stuff that is factually true but deemed "harmful" by our masters) and finally, mere opinion.

My opinions are just that. Opinion. They are based on way too much time wading through conspiracy theories, spam, nonsense and all the other crap you accuse me of "mindlessly" believing. I can see it for what it is.

Or at least I **think** I can see it.

Rather than accuse me of being hopelessly naive, why can't you out your finger on some actual opinion I may subscribe to and show me where I am wrong? Maybe I am naive. Maybe I am believing nonsense I probably shouldn't but I keep guessing right don't I? Nail your colour to the mast and stop just trying to tear mine down.

You on the other hand seem to think the years of persecution against Trump, the countless unsubstantiated allegations and uniquely targeted weaponisation of the judicial system was somehow "not politically motivated". When that didn't work to try and stop him being elected again they decided to kill him instead (as I feared they might).

They might just as well have another go. Like I said, they have nothing to lose now that the cat is out of the bag. It was obviously (there's that word again) a carefully crafted assassination attempt and an inside job orchestrated by the secret service assigned to protect Trump. They didn't fail to protect him, they failed to kill him.

Also, who else was saying that there was no way Joe Biden would stand for reelection? It's obvious to everyone now but It was obvious to me ages ago he wouldn't be allowed to stand for another term. Same with the "obvious" dementia, the "backroom cabal", the election fraud perpetrated by the Biden admin. Their attempted assassination...

I formed my opinions after wading through ridiculous amounts of conspiracy theories, misinformation, propaganda etc. yes, true. But it then goes through what I believe to be a considered process before it comes out here as an opinion. The assassination attempt is a great example of your knee jerk "conspiracy theorist!!" response. Allow me to paraphrase:

Screwdriver: in my opinion it was an inside job organised by the secret service. There's no other way to account for the multiple red flags these highly trained agents should easily have been able to spot. The timing is quite handy too, along with the subsequent coup against the failed Biden.

JamJam: in my opinion you are an idiot.

Can you see just how helpful that is to this or any other debate?

Anyhow, you should be worried because my spidey senses keep telling me the next trick (I can only hope they don't take another crack at Trump) is just to start a good old fashioned boots on the ground war with someone. If they can't goad Russia into it, they'll just find someone else and some other excuse.

[JamJar]

You know at least half the shit you’re reading on twitter is Russian and Chinese bot farms don’t you?

Half? More like 99% of anything online will be unsubstantiated garbage, propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation (stuff that is factually true but deemed "harmful" by our masters) and finally, mere opinion.

My opinions are just that. Opinion. They are based on way too much time wading through conspiracy theories, spam, nonsense and all the other crap you accuse me of "mindlessly" believing. I can see it for what it is.

Or at least I **think** I can see it.

Rather than accuse me of being hopelessly naive, why can't you out your finger on some actual opinion I may subscribe to and show me where I am wrong? Maybe I am naive. Maybe I am believing nonsense I probably shouldn't but I keep guessing right don't I? Nail your colour to the mast and stop just trying to tear mine down.

You on the other hand seem to think the years of persecution against Trump, the countless unsubstantiated allegations and uniquely targeted weaponisation of the judicial system was somehow "not politically motivated". When that didn't work to try and stop him being elected again they decided to kill him instead (as I feared they might).

They might just as well have another go. Like I said, they have nothing to lose now that the cat is out of the bag. It was obviously (there's that word again) a carefully crafted assassination attempt and an inside job orchestrated by the secret service assigned to protect Trump. They didn't fail to protect him, they failed to kill him.

Also, who else was saying that there was no way Joe Biden would stand for reelection? It's obvious to everyone now but It was obvious to me ages ago he wouldn't be allowed to stand for another term. Same with the "obvious" dementia, the "backroom cabal", the election fraud perpetrated by the Biden admin. Their attempted assassination...

I formed my opinions after wading through ridiculous amounts of conspiracy theories, misinformation, propaganda etc. yes, true. But it then goes through what I believe to be a considered process before it comes out here as an opinion. The assassination attempt is a great example of your knee jerk "conspiracy theorist!!" response. Allow me to paraphrase:

Screwdriver: in my opinion it was an inside job organised by the secret service. There's no other way to account for the multiple red flags these highly trained agents should easily have been able to spot. The timing is quite handy too, along with the subsequent coup against the failed Biden.

JamJam: in my opinion you are an idiot.

Can you see just how helpful that is to this or any other debate?

Anyhow, you should be worried because my spidey senses keep telling me the next trick (I can only hope they don't take another crack at Trump) is just to start a good old fashioned boots on the ground war with someone. If they can't goad Russia into it, they'll just find someone else and some other excuse.

Ah bless

[Screwdriver]

Ah bless

Concise.
To the point.
Meaningless patronising rhetoric.

It would appear you are determined then to prove me correct in my assessment. I rest my case.

[JamJar]

Ah bless

Concise.
To the point.
Meaningless patronising rhetoric.

It would appear you are determined then to prove me correct in my assessment. I rest my case.

sweet

[Hoonercat]

Ah bless

Concise.
To the point.
Meaningless patronising rhetoric.

It would appear you are determined then to prove me correct in my assessment. I rest my case.

Thank fuck for that.

[wheelnut]

Hence the career advancement from sucking Willie Brown's brown willy.

Resorting to describing a women like that says a lot more about you than it does about her.

[Screwdriver]

Funny really. I do take on board a lot of the incessant ad hominem insults thrown at me. I mean, there are so many and they're always the same format so I guess I'd better get to the bottom of it, see if I can determine where these "conspiracy theory" jibes are derived.

One of us is being a mindless simpleton and once again, turns out it's not me...

[Screwdriver]

Resorting to describing a women like that says a lot more about you than it does about her.

Not in this case. She really is a whore and having whored her way through the world of politics has ended up with a shot at being the most powerful person on planet earth. Well, the most powerful puppet anyway.

I wonder if you have followed her trajectory at all or just happy to dismiss it as lies without feeling the need to actually find out the sordid truth?

[ZRX61]

Resorting to describing a women like that says a lot more about you than it does about her.

Then maybe she should have made better choices, even she admits her relationship with WB is an albatross around her neck. This isn't about rumors, character assassination or conjecture etc.

[wheelnut]

Resorting to describing a women like that says a lot more about you than it does about her.

Then maybe she should have made better choices, even she admits her relationship with WB is an albatross around her neck. This isn't about rumors, character assassination or conjecture etc.

No, it’s just about you being crass and immature enough that you resort to attacking Harris based on your perception of her sexual activities. Grow up ffs. This isn’t the 1970s anymore. Attack her on her policies, god knows there’s enough scope there.

[ZRX61]

No, it’s just about you being crass and immature enough that you resort to attacking Harris based on your perception of her sexual activities. Grow up ffs. This isn’t the 1970s anymore. Attack her on her policies, god knows there’s enough scope there.

Fuck all to do with perception, she's no better than Katie Price... I'm sure you think she's a fine upstanding ambassador for all women?

[westers151]

Screwdriver: in my opinion it was an inside job organised by the secret service. There's no other way to account for the multiple red flags these highly trained agents should easily have been able to spot. The timing is quite handy too, along with the subsequent coup against the failed Biden.

Why did they pick someone who was useless at shooting?

[Saga Lout]

...This isn’t the 1970s any more. Attack her on her policies, god knows there’s enough scope there.

Or attack her on her record. Like how well she managed the border when she was the Border Czar, except now, apparently, she wasn't the Border Czar. (We have always been at was with EastAsia. )

And isn't it strange that the left claim that she could become the first woman president when many of them don't even know what a woman is?

[Screwdriver]

Screwdriver: in my opinion it was an inside job organised by the secret service. There's no other way to account for the multiple red flags these highly trained agents should easily have been able to spot. The timing is quite handy too, along with the subsequent coup against the failed Biden.

Why did they pick someone who was useless at shooting?

Yeah I heard it's a "really easy" shot. Is it?

Unknown condition AR15 clone, 150metres, the crowd shouting "he's up there", police officer clambers up and the shooter points the rifle at him, he ducks, the shooter immediately swings around and fires half a dozen shots at Trump, one clips the side of his head, another (apparently) just passes in front. Red dot, not a telescopic sight. Useless??

Secret service sniper (apparently not one of the two on the roof behind Trump) or some unknown other sniper based a few hundred metres away (according to Don Bongino who's been proved right on a lot of the stuff he has uncovered) takes the assassin out. Dead men tell no tales.

Not forgetting, as I posted at the time immediately after seeing the video, Trump turned his head at the EXACT moment the shooter fired, the bullet clipped his ear. When it left the barrel of the rifle it would have been a perfect head shot had it been ten milliseconds earlier. In that time, Trump moved.

I do believe I called it a miracle Trumps head didn't explode live on camera. I am still of that opinion. It was ridiculously close. The world would have become a much darker place but for those few thousandths of a second...

[westers151]

Stuff

Thanks for the detailed theory, but you didn't answer why they picked someone who was a shit shot. I mean, you'd have thought they'd use someone who had a history of being a competent shot. Don't you?

[demographic]

Not in this case. She really is a whore and having whored her way through the world of politics has ended up with a shot at being the most powerful person on planet earth. Well, the most powerful puppet anyway.

Whore eh? Just what exactly defines a "Whore" in your opinion. Number of partners?
I've got a daughter in her 30s who's had a few boyfriends and might want to just mention the exact number that she turns from daughter to whore so she can stay on the right side of it.
Do males suffer from this, is the number the same? Just so I know if I'm at risk myself
Who gets to judge?
Am I more at risk of the title if I do it to advance my career and can I knob a load of pornstars without fear of being judged.


Just wonderin about the rules really.

[wheelnut]

Stuff….

So the USSS were incompetent either way. Incompetent for not securing the area properly or incompetent for not carrying out their conspiracy properly by choosing a kid who was a shit shot.

Using Occam as guide, which do you think is more likely?

[wheelnut]

Whore eh? Just what exactly defines a "Whore" in your opinion. Number of partners?
I've got a daughter in her 30s who's had a few boyfriends and might want to just mention the exact number that she turns from daughter to whore so she can stay on the right side of it.
Do males suffer from this, is the number the same? Just so I know if I'm at risk myself
Who gets to judge?
Am I more at risk of the title if I do it to advance my career and can I knob a load of pornstars without fear of being judged.


Just wonderin about the rules really.

At least we know Trump isn’t one, he just pays them to shut up.