This topic boggles my mind a little. Given the expense of Rukka gear,do buyers in general just accept leaky clothing,or do they keep going back until they get something which doesn't leak?Whysub wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 10:06 am Previous 20 years I mostly had top of the range Rukka stuff, but it always leaked somewhere, either on the front or shoulders. Not much in the way of leaks, but little ones are as annoying as big ones.
Surely a buyer has the right to expect waterproof bike kit to be...er..waterproof,even if it's not hyper expensive? With Rukka and it's contemporaries that expectation to perform becomes imperative,doesn't it?
If I spent upwards of 2k,I'd expect it to do the job properly and to do it for a long time. Am I deluded to expect that?