Slenver wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:41 pm
Screwdriver wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 6:33 pm
So you think Biden is really in charge??
Seriously? You believe that??
What does that even mean? Any modern government is made up of huge teams of advisors, assistants, secretaries etc who, collectively, assist, educate, inform and advise whatever premier is in charge.
I imagine there's a fairly large range in terms of how much advice they request or require, and I imagine that Biden would need significantly more than most.
But do I subscribe to the wacko conspiracy theory I've seen on a few far-right forums that he's some kind of puppet installed by Obama or Soros or Ronald McDonald or whoever? No. Obviously not.
OK let me get this straight. I say Biden is "obviously" not in charge because since day #1 he has had to read off cue cards, avoids any contact with the press and instead has invited members only (in a fake "Whitehouse" studio) ask pre prepared questions before he is whisked away by his "handlers". When he does try and extemporise, his handlers immediately step in, shouting over any questions, cutting the mic, or on one occasion, dragging him away from a crowd with a giant Easter bunny.
So he is just there to read off his cue cards, ergo: a puppet. Naturally you might suggest he writes his own cue cards but on a number of occasions has said lit. " I'll get in trouble" if he strays away from what he has been told to say. He also has a habit of reading his stage cues <pause>, <repeat last line>. No need to dig too far into the horrendous gaffes like the last time he spoke to President Mitterand who just happened to be dead at the time, mixing up Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan.
We digress. I have formed my opinion of this empty headed hollow man based on countless examples of seeing him "in action".
You say that you disagree but then go on to suggest there is "a large range of advice" which you go on to say they might "request" of Biden or more cryptically "require" which implies he is being
told. These are your own words. Which is what I am suggesting.
Who are these people? Well, you say "huge teams of advisors, assistants, secretaries etc" which is like waving your hands vaguely in the direction of the swamp (i.e. the "permanent" Whitehouse grandees. I disagree with your "somewhere over there" suggestion because personally, I don't think decisions ("requests" or "requirements") on funding for Ukraine or supporting Israel are being made by a secretary.
I suggest it is much more likely a cabal of self interested parties, global corporate heads, multi billionaires, the embedded lifetime "deep state" grandees etc. Their "requests/requirements" which will be input to the puppet president I suggest are facilitated by the big guns like Obama or Clinton, Pelosi et. al. This is a much more likely scenario for anyone to act as an "advisor" than an <unspecified> "assistant" unless you suggest Obama/Clinton/Pelosi are de facto "assistants.
You could put me right of course by suggesting who you think these "advisors and assistants" are. Decisions are never made by a headless group but frankly, I would "walk back" on your suggestion that secretaries are making decisions.
It is obvious to me that Biden has always been a puppet and I struggle to believe anyone really thinks he is in charge of anything especially now that his mental health has deteriorated to such an extent anyone with eyes can see it.
What worries me more is this charade is too obvious now but the shadowy administration-behind-the-scenes do not appear to be really doing anything except propping up Bidens corpse. This is a group of massively wealthy people, keen to carry on going until they own everything. I don't believe for one minute they don't have a contingencyplan. Trump is going to walk this election by a mile. They can't use the same tactics last time to cheat the election. I fear something darker.
...and both Trump and Biden are scheduled to be in the same place at the same time only weeks from now.
Be a shame if that building accidentally exploded or a Boeing 747 fell on it. I can think of plenty of eminently plausible accidents you could engineer. Question is, even if "they" do go all in and it's really obvious that killing two birds with one stone was just too damned convenient, what is to stop them getting away with it?
