Sora - AI Video Generatiion

[ChrisW]

This is seriously impressive:

https://openai.com/sora

Stock footage & mis-information ahoy!

[KungFooBob]

Finally, mine and Natalie Portman's sex tape might become a reality!

[Eclipse]

[Taipan]

This is seriously impressive:

https://openai.com/sora

Stock footage & mis-information ahoy!

Bloodyfuckinghell!

[Buckaroo]

I caught a small part of a discussion on AI. Can't remember the precise terms used but essentially it was "AI is no longer a subject of human technology. Humans are the subject"

Struck me as a bit weird.

AI is working us out.

[Mussels]

I caught a small part of a discussion on AI. Can't remember the precise terms used but essentially it was "AI is no longer a subject of human technology. Humans are the subject"

Struck me as a bit weird.

AI is working us out.

Or that's just someone's fantasy they want to convince others is real.

[Count Steer]

I caught a small part of a discussion on AI. Can't remember the precise terms used but essentially it was "AI is no longer a subject of human technology. Humans are the subject"

Struck me as a bit weird.

AI is working us out.

It's a slightly sensationalist way of putting it but it's right in the sense that AI uses our outputs as inputs. There will come a time when the inputs include significant material generated by other AIs* which is a bit

None of it is original 'thought' though, but then again, how much of what hoomans generate on-line is?

* At the moment I think some people claim AI can distinguish between AI generated output (in academic scenarios) and human productions. Dunno how long that will be true, even if it is now.

[Mussels]

I caught a small part of a discussion on AI. Can't remember the precise terms used but essentially it was "AI is no longer a subject of human technology. Humans are the subject"

Struck me as a bit weird.

AI is working us out.

It's a slightly sensationalist way of putting it but it's right in the sense that AI uses our outputs as inputs. There will come a time when the inputs include significant material generated by other AIs* which is a bit

None of it is original 'thought' though, but then again, how much of what hoomans generate on-line is?

* At the moment I think some people claim AI can distinguish between AI generated output (in academic scenarios) and human productions. Dunno how long that will be true, even if it is now.

When I was trying ChatGPT to see if it was any use I noticed it had a limited set of answers to a specialist subject and would roll out those same answers in different ways, it also made the same mistakes repeatedly. I suspect anyone marking digitised exams can use machine learning to spot those patterns pretty easily, they can probably even identify which text books were used.