Vote!

Current affairs, Politics, News.

Which way would you vote?

Conservative
6
11%
Labour
20
38%
Liberal
6
11%
Green
2
4%
Farage!
4
8%
Anyone but this shower
15
28%
 
Total votes: 53

User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13948
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15957 times
Been thanked: 10248 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Taipan »

Mr. Dazzle wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:52 pm
Potter wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 1:50 pm So being nice to the top 10% of earners in the UK might be prudent, unless you want the house of cards to fall in on you.
Top 10% is anyone over about 60k before tax, is it not?

Given that every man and his dog on this forum is an overpaid IT wanker, we're keeping the country afloat. Well done us.
Excuse me! I'm an underpaid IT wanked iffin you dont mind!
User avatar
Cousin Jack
Posts: 4455
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
Location: Down in the Duchy
Has thanked: 2551 times
Been thanked: 2286 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Cousin Jack »

Dodgy69 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 11:40 am I've heard many time's we need foreign workers to fill the vacancies mainly in our most undesirable jobs like care and hospitality but amongst others, Legal, illegal, who cares. 🤷🏻‍♂️

So when a country like England with its broken infrastructure and a high population density, still needs foreign workers something has gone seriously wrong. On one hand we're full, on the other we ain't.

Has our economy outgrown its country. 🤔
No our workers have become shirkers. Some choose benefits, some claim sickness for stuff we would soldier on with, and those that do work all want to retire at 50 and live to 100.
Cornish Tart #1

Remember An Gof!
User avatar
Dodgy69
Posts: 5456
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
Location: Shrewsbury
Has thanked: 1746 times
Been thanked: 2085 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Dodgy69 »

Possibly, I get the sickness bit definitely but I'm not convinced folk choose benefits, it ain't much £££. Not sure about 50 yo retiring either.

Personally, i don't know anyone who's out of work, who wants work. My lad is 24 and all his friends work.

Think it's simply, no one wants the shit jobs any more. The fallout of progress sort of thing.
Yamaha rocket 3
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Vote!

Post by irie »

mangocrazy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:28 pm All I'm interested in seeing is all levels of wealth paying their due amount. For anyone on PAYE there's precious little scope to escape HMRC's dragnet, but that's not the case for higher earners (and I'm talking £500k plus here) who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like. I'm also looking at you Amazon, Google, Apple and any company that funnels UK earnings into a holding company in Lichtenstein, Turks & Caicos etc. and thereby avoids paying UK taxes. If everyone actually paid the taxes they should be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
"Should" :?:

Please define what "should" means.

Thanks.
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6902
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2405 times
Been thanked: 3630 times

Re: Vote!

Post by mangocrazy »

irie wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:22 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:28 pm All I'm interested in seeing is all levels of wealth paying their due amount. For anyone on PAYE there's precious little scope to escape HMRC's dragnet, but that's not the case for higher earners (and I'm talking £500k plus here) who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like. I'm also looking at you Amazon, Google, Apple and any company that funnels UK earnings into a holding company in Lichtenstein, Turks & Caicos etc. and thereby avoids paying UK taxes. If everyone actually paid the taxes they should be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
"Should" :?:

Please define what "should" means.

Thanks.
If everyone actually paid the taxes they were required by law to be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
irie
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
Has thanked: 1482 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Vote!

Post by irie »

mangocrazy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:45 pm
irie wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:22 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:28 pm All I'm interested in seeing is all levels of wealth paying their due amount. For anyone on PAYE there's precious little scope to escape HMRC's dragnet, but that's not the case for higher earners (and I'm talking £500k plus here) who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like. I'm also looking at you Amazon, Google, Apple and any company that funnels UK earnings into a holding company in Lichtenstein, Turks & Caicos etc. and thereby avoids paying UK taxes. If everyone actually paid the taxes they should be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
"Should" :?:

Please define what "should" means.

Thanks.
If everyone actually paid the taxes they were required by law to be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
Those "who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like ... and thereby avoids paying UK taxes." are acting lawfully.

hth
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 6902
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2405 times
Been thanked: 3630 times

Re: Vote!

Post by mangocrazy »

irie wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:18 pm
mangocrazy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:45 pm
irie wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:22 pm

"Should" :?:

Please define what "should" means.

Thanks.
If everyone actually paid the taxes they were required by law to be paying the UK Treasury would have an embarassment of riches.
Those "who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like ... and thereby avoids paying UK taxes." are acting lawfully.

hth
They are acting on the edge of legality; it's a grey area (as is so often the case with UK tax law). A smart government (and one whose members weren't also taking advantage of these grey areas) would move to shut down those loopholes.

hth
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
Yambo
Posts: 2470
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:08 pm
Location: Self Isolating
Has thanked: 598 times
Been thanked: 1647 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Yambo »

irie wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:18 pm
Those "who can structure their tax affairs using offshore trust funds and the like ... and thereby avoids paying UK taxes." are acting lawfully.

hth

And the government, our elected representatives (all of them, ad infinitum ) have set up the system to allow these lawful actions.

Closing loopholes is not the job of the HMRC.
demographic
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
Has thanked: 1346 times
Been thanked: 1722 times

Re: Vote!

Post by demographic »

Potter wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:43 pm
Pirahna wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 2:33 pm
So they've already left? If they're corporate they're easily replaced, if they're running their own business someone will step into the space they've left. Trust me, their tax money will be replaced by someone else, they won't be missed.

My only tie to the UK is my pension and investments, as long that is safe I don't care too much what goes on there.
They're just rich and decided not to live in the UK any more, because they have the choice.

If you're talking about companies then 'trust me', they don't just get replaced, go to Hindley-Green and show me the company that replaced Ingersoll-Rand after (IIRC) over a hundred years and generations of families working there. That was a fairly small scale local thing, but whole families lost jobs.

If companies leave the UK then they don't necessarily get replaced like it's a conveyor belt, sometimes it leaves a great big hole.
I thought Ingersoll Rand was an American company anyway?
When did they close the UK division down and why did they do it?
User avatar
Pirahna
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:31 pm
Has thanked: 1816 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Pirahna »

I've been looking for news stories about Ingersoll Rand, there's stuff from 1981, 2003 and 2010. The most I can see is 160 job losses from a town in Lancashire.
demographic
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
Has thanked: 1346 times
Been thanked: 1722 times

Re: Vote!

Post by demographic »

As far as I can work out its a new York company that moved some of their processes...erm...abroad. The bastards.

To be fair they'll likely have bought a Lancashire company out before changing the sign above the door, running it for a bit then eventually closing the doors in about 2020 or so?

Looks like the main company just pulled out of the UK not long after some measures meant other areas were more competitive.
User avatar
Pirahna
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:31 pm
Has thanked: 1816 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Pirahna »

Potter wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:51 am
Pirahna wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 9:11 am I've been looking for news stories about Ingersoll Rand, there's stuff from 1981, 2003 and 2010. The most I can see is 160 job losses from a town in Lancashire.
I'll tell you what I know.
Ingersoll-Rand had a factory and European head offices in HIndley-Green in Lancashire, they ran their MENA operations from there, so head office staff, warehouse, factory, tech development, etc.

It had been there for many decades, I'm sure I was told a hundred years but I can't be sure on that, but what I am sure of is an acquaintance crying when she told me that her husband, son and herself were going to lose their jobs, her husband had started as an apprentice over thirty years ago.

It was one of the main employers of that small town and it was pretty devastating when they split their operations and flitted abroad, the factory went to Czech, the warehouse to Belgium, the head office to Ireland, etc.
As far as I know it was various reasons, tax breaks, cheaper labour abroad, etc.

That's the potted history that I know and I only used it as example of a company that left the UK and no one was there to fill the gap, like you assured me there would be, there was no queue of companies to fill the hole it left.
As far I can tell they made/make mainly pumps. There was no shortage of pumps after they left the UK, their departure left no gap to fill, you could even buy Ingersoll Rand stuff after they left. Yes it affected a few locals but in the scheme of things it wasn't noticed.
MyLittleStudPony
Posts: 1152
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:28 pm
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 407 times

Re: Vote!

Post by MyLittleStudPony »

It may have been disastrous for business and increased immigration but we've still got the blue passports and all the fish.

Well, the blue passports at least.

Keep it Brexity, nice and Brexity. :thumbup:
demographic
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:30 pm
Location: Less that 50 miles away from Moscow, but which one?
Has thanked: 1346 times
Been thanked: 1722 times

Re: Vote!

Post by demographic »

So, they moved into continental Europe, various countries after something in the UK increased their operating costs.
Left Lancashire in about 2020.

So, what made their operations in the UK more difficult?
mboy
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:34 am
Location: Worcester
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Vote!

Post by mboy »

Just listened to this as an audiobook the other day...

Image

To be honest, it should be a mandatory text in the UK before being allowed to vote in the upcoming general election quite frankly! Written in a deeply reflective and unbiased manor, O'Brien picks apart the perfect (shit)storm that allowed the Uk to degenerate to where it is now over the lastdecade or so of government...

I like O'Brien anyway, as far from being a lefty loony or champagne socialist that many in our current government would label him as, he's a pretty old school centrist (much like myself) that seems to feel politically quite homeless right now (I know the feeling)... He doesn't hold back with his criticisms of Labour, and in particular Jeremy Corbyn, either...

I was worried it might heighten my political induced anxiety that has at times really affected me since the Brexit vote back in 2016, but far from it, it helped me to understand the situation we are in much better, and that arguably that set of circumstances is unlikely to ever happen again even just by chance, but certainly we shouldn't just sleepwalk into them as a country like we have done thus...

Well worth a read/listen...
Bigjawa
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2020 10:54 pm
Location: Ballymena Co. Antrim
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 878 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Bigjawa »

mboy wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 9:48 pm Just listened to this as an audiobook the other day...

Image

To be honest, it should be a mandatory text in the UK before being allowed to vote in the upcoming general election quite frankly! Written in a deeply reflective and unbiased manor, O'Brien picks apart the perfect (shit)storm that allowed the Uk to degenerate to where it is now over the lastdecade or so of government...

I like O'Brien anyway, as far from being a lefty loony or champagne socialist that many in our current government would label him as, he's a pretty old school centrist (much like myself) that seems to feel politically quite homeless right now (I know the feeling)... He doesn't hold back with his criticisms of Labour, and in particular Jeremy Corbyn, either...

I was worried it might heighten my political induced anxiety that has at times really affected me since the Brexit vote back in 2016, but far from it, it helped me to understand the situation we are in much better, and that arguably that set of circumstances is unlikely to ever happen again even just by chance, but certainly we shouldn't just sleepwalk into them as a country like we have done thus...

Well worth a read/listen...
He always comes across as a bit of a microphone warrior, seems very sneery to people who don't agree with him. I listen to the show but when he starts getting on like a school bully, I switch off.
mboy
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:34 am
Location: Worcester
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Vote!

Post by mboy »

Bigjawa wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 6:07 pm He always comes across as a bit of a microphone warrior, seems very sneery to people who don't agree with him. I listen to the show but when he starts getting on like a school bully, I switch off.
The book is well written... More reflective, less reactionary, but I know what you mean...
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 13948
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 15957 times
Been thanked: 10248 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Taipan »

:thumbup:

User avatar
Pirahna
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:31 pm
Has thanked: 1816 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Pirahna »

Taipan wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 9:42 am :thumbup:
You do know who Reform UK are?
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 11809
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 6376 times
Been thanked: 4753 times

Re: Vote!

Post by Count Steer »

Pirahna wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:41 am
Taipan wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 9:42 am :thumbup:
You do know who Reform UK are?
Blokes who don't even know how to clean their own specs?
Doubt is not a pleasant condition.
But certainty is an absurd one
.
Voltaire