Actually, I wouldn'tMr. Dazzle wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:11 am It's more about the frontal area though - literally what you'd think: bigger worse than smaller![]()
I'd think maximum cross sectional area
He said, for typical vehicles, the teardrop should be (IIRC) 3.5:1 length ...Notice how these cars all tend to have gently sloping rears though. As loads of people know the way teh air leaves the car is critical to drag, probably more than the front end.
... but that the front could be blunted and about 15% could be chopped off without too much adverse effect.So they these Kammback style rear ends. It's really obvious on Teslas.
From the link
So that's different.The ideal shape to minimize drag is a "teardrop," a smooth airfoil-like shape, but it is not practical for road vehicles because of size constraints. However, researchers, including Kamm, found that abruptly cutting off the tail resulted in a minimal increase in drag.
Kamm's design is based on the tail being truncated at the point where the cross section area is 50% of the car's maximum cross-section
