Until it rains.
Waterless Coolant
-
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:11 pm
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 1278 times
- dern
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 1797 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
I don’t know. It’s not an on off mechanism though. It’s actively modulating flow all the time unless closed during warm up or wide open.
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14314
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 7597 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
I (probably incorrectly) thought the thermostat was only really there to aid in warm up. Not passing coolant until everything was up to temp... and that in normal operation the temp would never drop below the closing temp.
-
- Posts: 14071
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2572 times
- Been thanked: 6303 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
The thermostat will typically close every time the engine switches off. It does regulate the flow, hence the name. You need it because the coolant flow rate (set by engine/pump speed), flow through the radiator and the engine heat production rate are all different/varying.
Unless that is you've got a lovely modern car with a 48V electric water pump which just controls flow rate directly by varying pump speed.
Re: waterless coolant. F1 cars use a pretty traditional water+coolant mix. Water is great coolant!
Unless that is you've got a lovely modern car with a 48V electric water pump which just controls flow rate directly by varying pump speed.
Re: waterless coolant. F1 cars use a pretty traditional water+coolant mix. Water is great coolant!
- MrLongbeard
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
- Has thanked: 604 times
- Been thanked: 2473 times
-
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 8:50 am
- Location: Top 'o the Worle
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 689 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
In the long run, all engines (even marine) are water cooled if operated within the confines of the atmosphere.
- mangocrazy
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 2418 times
- Been thanked: 3662 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
To be honest that is one of the issues with naked style bikes - there's no bodywork to duct away the hot air from the fans and stop clothing (and legs) from contacting hot parts of the motorcycle. Any remediation in terms of putting in ducting or just a heat guard would probably look Really Shit.Trinity765 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 11:01 amI do but it requires effort so when relaxing my knees fall on the fins.Le_Fromage_Grande wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:44 amI was going to say "Time to spread your legs" but decided it was too tasteless, but it does sound like you need to ride the bike with you knees away from the engine.Trinity765 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:48 am The Speed Twin 1200 has a very hot engine and that's to be expected I guess. I was out all day yesterday at around 24c and the fan was on almost continuously. The worst thing is that my knees sit on the fins which is fine when I'm wearing thick motorcycle clothing, though they look a little melted, but when wearing jeans it burns. Reading comments on the Speed Twin forum a lot of people have this issue, burning knees and constant fan, and someone has said that their fan comes on 50% less using waterless coolant. The bike doesn't have an engine temperate gauge, just a warning light which has never come on and I don't believe that there is an issue as they all do it. It's more, I'm guessing, shorter people and where their knees sit.
My concern is that waterless coolant could corrode something that water doesn't and is it worth the faff of changing over. I would be wise to ask Triumph as the bike is still under warranty though I'm sure to get a "no" from them.
I wanted to know more about it as I've never heard of it.
I thinking about getting another Street Triple to be honest. It's becoming an itch that won't go away.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
-
- Posts: 14071
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2572 times
- Been thanked: 6303 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
Little bit cryptic maybe, but this should shed some light...Count Steer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:15 am . Some bike forums appear to conclude that the top end runs hotter with waterless coolant.
https://www.engineersedge.com/heat_tran ... _15915.htm
In essence this graph is showing how much heat various concentrations of Propylene Glycol (the main ingredient in waterless coolant) can absorb. I.e. how much energy it takes to heat these liquids up. Or to phrase it the other way around, if you've got a given amount of this liquid how much energy it can suck away from the stuff it's touching.
Note how water is the best (biggest number). Higher concentrations of PG get steadily 'worse' cause there's less water. Note how 100% PG goes further right though, all the others fall over at a lower temp cause the water starts boiling.
The reason to use some PG is to raise the boiling point, prevent corrosion and make the water "wetter"...break the surface tension so it "touches" the insides of the engine more and carries heat away better.
You're not gonna benefit significantly from a raised boiling point on an otherwise stock bike. Either the coolant will get too hot and break something else, nothing will change or the ECU will cry foul and kill it anyway. To really benefit you need an engine specifically set up for higher coolant temps.
If you did run 100% PG you can potentially reject more heat from the same sized radiator...hotter coolant, same sized rad, same air temp = chance to get more heat out of the rad. But if the system isn't designed for that you'll not see a benefit.
- Trinity765
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:27 pm
- Location: Brighton
- Has thanked: 2444 times
- Been thanked: 2399 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
Brilliant! Thanks. Not worth the effort then.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 6:04 pmLittle bit cryptic maybe, but this should shed some light...Count Steer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:15 am . Some bike forums appear to conclude that the top end runs hotter with waterless coolant.
https://www.engineersedge.com/heat_tran ... _15915.htm
In essence this graph is showing how much heat various concentrations of Propylene Glycol (the main ingredient in waterless coolant) can absorb. I.e. how much energy it takes to heat these liquids up. Or to phrase it the other way around, if you've got a given amount of this liquid how much energy it can suck away from the stuff it's touching.
Note how water is the best (biggest number). Higher concentrations of PG get steadily 'worse' cause there's less water. Note how 100% PG goes further right though, all the others fall over at a lower temp cause the water starts boiling.
The reason to use some PG is to raise the boiling point, prevent corrosion and make the water "wetter"...break the surface tension so it "touches" the insides of the engine more and carries heat away better.
You're not gonna benefit significantly from a raised boiling point on an otherwise stock bike. Either the coolant will get too hot and break something else, nothing will change or the ECU will cry foul and kill it anyway. To really benefit you need an engine specifically set up for higher coolant temps.
If you did run 100% PG you can potentially reject more heat from the same sized radiator...hotter coolant, same sized rad, same air temp = chance to get more heat out of the rad. But if the system isn't designed for that you'll not see a benefit.
- Yorick
- Posts: 16807
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10340 times
- Been thanked: 6916 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
I read many years ago that speedboat engines are the highest tuned as they have the biggest cooling system.
Re: Waterless Coolant
... but now that engine efficiency is under the microscope remember that any heat lost to coolant, even if its an endless supply of sea water, wastes fuel.
-
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 8:50 am
- Location: Top 'o the Worle
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 689 times
Re: Waterless Coolant
poo stix!!! I meant air cooled......