Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
-
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:09 pm
- Has thanked: 665 times
- Been thanked: 1163 times
Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
I think my view is that the BBC are doing the right thing here: wanting to keep names out of the news until an investigation can be completed.
I also think that the organisation has had a bit of a bumpy ride with regards to its staff and engaging in dubious acts- so might have also forgiven then if they'd have come out more on the transparent, front foot.
Thoughts?
I also think that the organisation has had a bit of a bumpy ride with regards to its staff and engaging in dubious acts- so might have also forgiven then if they'd have come out more on the transparent, front foot.
Thoughts?
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23417
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5450 times
- Been thanked: 13085 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
Thoguht 1...
"should be in Current Affairs"
Thought 2
"what ?"
"should be in Current Affairs"
Thought 2
"what ?"
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
60% of the BBC's funding comes direct from tax money, in addition to that, the people also pay a TV Licence direct to the BBC.
Stop funding them, stop funding their fiddling and elite champagne socialists.
Stop funding them, stop funding their fiddling and elite champagne socialists.
- weeksy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23417
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 5450 times
- Been thanked: 13085 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
If it comes from Tax, how do you propose to do that ?
-
- Posts: 11233
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:40 pm
- Location: The road of many manky motorcycles
- Has thanked: 607 times
- Been thanked: 4124 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
My view is that the BBC needs to be a lot more careful about who it employs.
Honda Owner
- dern
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 8:51 am
- Has thanked: 1016 times
- Been thanked: 1766 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
The BBC are the same as any other company in that they'll protect their assets while they are valuable and dump them when they are more damaging. It's the same for literally any employee of any company.
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66148321
The Sun obviously know, but are not saying who. So that article does make sense.
The Sun obviously know, but are not saying who. So that article does make sense.
-
- Posts: 4438
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 836 times
- Been thanked: 1238 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
I read an explanation on the BBC saying a court case last year set a precedent that names aren't allowed to be released until charges are brought, that includes the police who were also way too happy to tar people with no evidence.
- Tricky
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:46 pm
- Location: Chilterns
- Has thanked: 2564 times
- Been thanked: 2680 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
Yup, exactly that IMO
I know someone who has a close friend there, and supposedly knows the details.KungFooBob wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 10:05 am https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66148321
The Sun obviously know, but are not saying who. So that article does make sense.
Assuming what they told me is true, I'm currently really struggling to believe it of this individual, so I'm choosing not to
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 907 times
- Been thanked: 1001 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
It’s a big organisation with thousands of employees. It’s just more newsworthy when one of them does something, err, newsworthy.Le_Fromage_Grande wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:58 am My view is that the BBC needs to be a lot more careful about who it employs.
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4495
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2259 times
- Been thanked: 2191 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
The handling of it a shambles. But then anything handled by HR normally is. In principle I doubt it's super different to the way that this sort of thing is handled in any other organisation - other than that by now, given the history, you would think they would have a foolproof dedicated policy for this exact scenario.
The flipside of the coin is the rest of the media's absolute joy in digging it out. Social media is one thing but some of the rags are happily "reporting" "stories" about every male beeb presenter not currently at their desk. They may as well put a little winky-eye face next to it."So-and-so is on holiday." In July? Who'd have thought it.
The flipside of the coin is the rest of the media's absolute joy in digging it out. Social media is one thing but some of the rags are happily "reporting" "stories" about every male beeb presenter not currently at their desk. They may as well put a little winky-eye face next to it."So-and-so is on holiday." In July? Who'd have thought it.
-
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2020 10:05 pm
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 403 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
It's the media innit, they are the lowest scum of all after Politicians and Investment Bankers.DefTrap wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 11:04 am The handling of it a shambles. But then anything handled by HR normally is. In principle I doubt it's super different to the way that this sort of thing is handled in any other organisation - other than that by now, given the history, you would think they would have a foolproof dedicated policy for this exact scenario.
The flipside of the coin is the rest of the media's absolute joy in digging it out. Social media is one thing but some of the rags are happily "reporting" "stories" about every male beeb presenter not currently at their desk. They may as well put a little winky-eye face next to it."So-and-so is on holiday." In July? Who'd have thought it.
- MrLongbeard
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:06 pm
- Has thanked: 599 times
- Been thanked: 2436 times
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 304 times
- Been thanked: 1007 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
That Kate Humble, I'd always hoped she was a filthy minx....
- KungFooBob
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
- Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 7526 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
Terry Nutkins!
- DefTrap
- Posts: 4495
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 8:23 am
- Has thanked: 2259 times
- Been thanked: 2191 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
Bill Oddie or Sir Attenburg. Or both.
Or 'Mixed' Grylls
Or that little chubby one.
Terrible teeth!
Or 'Mixed' Grylls
Or that little chubby one.
Terrible teeth!
-
- Posts: 11233
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:40 pm
- Location: The road of many manky motorcycles
- Has thanked: 607 times
- Been thanked: 4124 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
What point are you making?wheelnut wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 10:42 amIt’s a big organisation with thousands of employees. It’s just more newsworthy when one of them does something, err, newsworthy.Le_Fromage_Grande wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:58 am My view is that the BBC needs to be a lot more careful about who it employs.
Honda Owner
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2020 10:54 pm
- Location: Ballymena Co. Antrim
- Has thanked: 221 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Views on the BBC approach to protecting their media star?
Not Ranger Hamza!