In todays news...

[ZRX61]

The location of the White House cocaine has changed yet again (for at least the third time..)

The original location was the WH library... where Hunter Biden had been working... & then we have Pedo Joe refusing to deny the coke was Hunters...

[Ant]

Anyone want to cum for coffee?

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/doctor-avoid ... b3mXTkumwU

[Saga Lout]

Bishop says he's better than Jesus! (Well, more woke anyway. )

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... n-cottrell

"The archbishop of York has suggested that opening words of the Lord’s Prayer, recited by Christians all over the world for 2,000 years, may be “problematic” because of their patriarchal association."

"And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.
"And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth..." etc
Luke 11:1-13

Whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad. I'm steadily coming round to the idea that the Gods want to destroy western civilisation.

[Noggin]

Anyone want to cum for coffee?

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/doctor-avoid ... b3mXTkumwU

This is

He was also accused in court of sending pictures of his penis to two colleagues, which he said was an "accident".

Is that like ‘accidentally’ getting someone pregnant

[DefTrap]

"The archbishop of York has suggested that opening words of the Lord’s Prayer, recited by Christians all over the world for 2,000 years, may be “problematic” because of their patriarchal association."

I would say this nitpicking.

[Ant]

Anyone want to cum for coffee?

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/doctor-avoid ... b3mXTkumwU

This is

He was also accused in court of sending pictures of his penis to two colleagues, which he said was an "accident".

Is that like ‘accidentally’ getting someone pregnant

Yes it's a bit creepy isn't it, it's a bit mmmmm come to my pool for a free holiday kind of creepy.

[Ant]

So, which BBC presenter is suddenly missing? I guess who ever watches/listens to what it is will know....

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/bbc-presente ... FCkyEupTzg

[MyLittleStudPony]

The 'child' was 17 when it began. And already on crack.

I thought they'd be classified as an adult at 17.

[Ant]

Under 18 they are children.

[JackyJoll]

The 'child' was 17 when it began. And already on crack.

I thought they'd be classified as an adult at 17.

Is the BBC person a mate of yours then?

[MyLittleStudPony]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

[Ant]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

Yes they can but I dare say a lot don't rush out to do so.

[Noggin]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

Can't vote, drive, get married, get pissed legally till they are 18!!

[MrLongbeard]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

Can't vote, drive, get married, get pissed legally till they are 18!!

You can hold a full license at 17

[Noggin]

But they can have sex at 16.

Can't vote, drive, get married, get pissed legally till they are 18!!

You can hold a full license at 17

You're right, sorry! How did I not leave that out!!

[Bike Breaker]

But they can have sex at 16.

Can't vote, drive, get married, get pissed legally till they are 18!!

You can hold a full license at 17

Noggin lives in France where rules are different from the UK's.

[Noggin]

Can't vote, drive, get married, get pissed legally till they are 18!!

You can hold a full license at 17

Noggin lives in France where rules are different from the UK's.

I don't actually know what the driving age here is!!

Edit - should have resisted that reply! It is 18 here!! LOL

[JackyJoll]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

You’re thinking up excuses for this guy. Hope he appreciates it.

[MyLittleStudPony]

Under 18 they are children.

But they can have sex at 16.

You’re thinking up excuses for this guy. Hope he appreciates it.

I'm not saying it doesn't all sound a bit iffy. But IMO sending explicite pictures is < having full sex, which the the law says is ok.

I'm wary of pitchforking someone for something which may not have been be that bad. I don't know the details.

Do we know it's a 'he''? I haven't looked at the details really. Not that it should matter.

[Ant]

Well pictures have been sent to/from a child, that's more than a bit iffy.