Mr. Dazzle wrote: Tue Apr 11, 2023 12:39 pm
That's certainly true ^^^.
If I were in Dodgys shoes I'd probably pay a FA for a one off consultancy, rather than letting em take on my portfolio. You're not talking very much money (in relative terms) for that.
I think that depends how you are wired. I have a friend who retired at 50 , who gambles on the stock exchange every morning. He has done very nicely but it takes a lot of time (which he has) and isn't always rosy. But he is very OCD - and all the patterns in the numbers make him tick.
Another friend has "invested his because it is not hard to do" - but is not very forthcoming in actually what it is invested in and it yields 100k p.a. (he says). In all the time that I have spent with him, I have never seen him with Investor's Chronicle (my dad's favourite), or reading the FT. Or reading, in fact. So I am really not sure what / who/ where it is invested.
Mine is invested with a FA. It costs me a reasonable amount a year for them to manage... but I am probably too ADAA/ impetuous/ allergic to gambling/ prone to being impetuous to do a better job. So far, it gives me, net, not far off what I was earning before I quit work (which is precisely why I left work). Plus I have to due next to bugger all about it.
One of my better decisions when I was in my 20s was to put in as much as in could into AVCs