valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
- gremlin
- Posts: 7856
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 1102 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
I doubt they would have any 'collectible' value. The limit of the claim is probably the cost of the canvas and paints.Deadpool2 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:49 pm I have been given some artwork by friends, who are students. They were damaged during a water leak. How can I assess the value for them?
Remember Anne Diamond!
- Yambo
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:08 pm
- Location: Self Isolating
- Has thanked: 512 times
- Been thanked: 1403 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
Art has no intrinsic value.
You could cart them all off to an auction house where they might put a value on them i.e. what they might sell for but otherwise, gremlin is right.
You could cart them all off to an auction house where they might put a value on them i.e. what they might sell for but otherwise, gremlin is right.
- Count Steer
- Posts: 15906
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 8035 times
- Been thanked: 5693 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
What would it cost to commission copies/replacements? Might be worth pitching that at the insurance company?
The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
- Horse
- Posts: 14226
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 7618 times
- Been thanked: 5929 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
If they were particularly valuable, you would have needed to have them insured specifically at that value.gremlin wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:54 pmI doubt they would have any 'collectible' value. The limit of the claim is probably the cost of the canvas and paints.Deadpool2 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:49 pm I have been given some artwork by friends, who are students. They were damaged during a water leak. How can I assess the value for them?
Have your friends sold any equivalent work? Use that as a guide.
But note that things like jewellery are often worth no more than weigh-in for their metal.
Even bland can be a type of character 
- gremlin
- Posts: 7856
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:12 pm
- Location: Kent (AKA God's own country)
- Has thanked: 1102 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
Tommy Cooper had it right....westers151 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:42 pmFor unknown artists, I'd agree, but your de Vincis, Turner, van Gogh, etc, would have a value that's a bit more than the oil and canvasYambo wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:10 pm Art has no intrinsic value.
You could cart them all off to an auction house where they might put a value on them i.e. what they might sell for but otherwise, gremlin is right.![]()
Remember Anne Diamond!
-
Mr. Dazzle
- Posts: 16347
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2417 times
- Been thanked: 6369 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
If it had intrinsic value, it wouldn't be art.
Can't remember who said it, but it's something along the lines of "To be considered art, an item must have no purpose other than to just be itself".
- Skub
- Posts: 14892
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
- Location: Norn Iron
- Has thanked: 13109 times
- Been thanked: 14170 times
Re: valuing pictures etc for insurance purposes
That's me right there. I must be art.Mr. Dazzle wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:52 pm Can't remember who said it, but it's something along the lines of "To be considered art, an item must have no purpose other than to just be itself".
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
