In todays news...
- MingtheMerciless
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:42 am
- Location: Scarfolk on Sea
- Has thanked: 2947 times
- Been thanked: 1884 times
Re: In todays news...
Oh shiiii
At least seven dead after Brazil cliff collapses on boats https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-59923900
At least seven dead after Brazil cliff collapses on boats https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-59923900
"Of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?"
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
"My dear Doctor, they're all true."
"Even the lies?"
"Especially the lies."
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 9:45 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 215 times
Re: In todays news...
That isn't supposed to be the function of a jury. It is to find guilt or innocence of the defendant according to the law. Question 1, did they do it? Question2, did they have a lawful excuse? Lawful excuse doesn't include taking a personal moral stand. See the Criminal Damage Act for definitions.Asian Boss wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:29 pmI was glad to hear a trial by jury came down in favour of taking a stand against glorifying slavery and racism.
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1750 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
Re: In todays news...
It's a sham alright, they just didn't want to annoy the noisy people.
Yamaha rocket 3
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 908 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Re: In todays news...
Who? The jury?Dodgy knees wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:58 am It's a sham alright, they just didn't want to annoy the noisy people.
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1750 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
- Yorick
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
- Location: Paradise
- Has thanked: 10276 times
- Been thanked: 6891 times
Re: In todays news...
This is an interesting read. Not sure what to make of it. Still think it's vandalism.
https://thesecretbarrister.com/2022/01/ ... ould-know/
https://thesecretbarrister.com/2022/01/ ... ould-know/
- Dodgy69
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:36 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
- Has thanked: 1750 times
- Been thanked: 2085 times
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 908 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Re: In todays news...
What’s that old saying?Potter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:32 pm Come now, does anyone think that those four gurning buffoons actually care about the exploitation of brown people?
They'll be on the corporate tit in a year or so, sucking away, working their way up to middle management, probably somewhere like Amazon, where occasionally they'll read a story about a protest somewhere and they'll clutch the newspaper to their chests in a melancholy moment of vicarious victory - then they'll get back on their hamster wheels and send off emails to suppliers complaining that their products aren't cheap enough and more exploitation is needed to hit their profit margins.
They've been taught in schools and universities that only exist because of people like Edward Colston. Every penny that every one of you has ever held bears the stains of thousands of years of human history, thinking that you're different and you can separate the platelets from the meat is vanity.
Anyone who isn’t a socialist at 20 hasn’t got a heart, anyone who isn’t a conservative at 40 doesn’t have a brain.
- wheelnut
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 4:36 pm
- Has thanked: 908 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Re: In todays news...
My mistake, I thought you were comparing them. That’s how it seemed.Tricky wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:36 pm
I wasn't, but I think you know that.
i was however suggesting that if they really did care about slavery ( sweatshops like this https://9to5mac.com/2021/05/10/seven-ap ... ced-labor/ as I guess you prefer to call it from your post ) then I would expect them to be doing something about it even if that something is just not buying certain products.
And how do you know they aren’t?
-
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:02 pm
- Has thanked: 839 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: In todays news...
I agree, the defence just managed to throw enough shade over it that the jury couldn't be sure, expect this as the standard defence for any rioters, looters or vandals from now until we get a clearer law.Yorick wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:58 pm This is an interesting read. Not sure what to make of it. Still think it's vandalism.
https://thesecretbarrister.com/2022/01/ ... ould-know/
-
- Posts: 13965
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2552 times
- Been thanked: 6260 times
Re: In todays news...
I see your point here, but....
Things now are better than they were, IMO. I don't think we're in danger of world peace and universal free bum love breaking out any time soon, but they ARE better. If you look at almost any objective measure human life has got steadily better over the last centuries.
Surely that only happened because people thought it was possible to, and therefore tried to, clean up some of the stains? Somewhat ironically Coulson seems like he may actually have been one of those people if you look at his other activities. But nobodies perfect eh?
- Horse
- Posts: 11563
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6199 times
- Been thanked: 5090 times
Re: In todays news...
As the article points out, it's the prosecution task to demonstrate guilt.
Again, the article points out that the law is clear, there are no 'loopholes' to close.
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 3:45 pm
- Location: RoI
- Has thanked: 1264 times
- Been thanked: 1188 times
Re: In todays news...
A jury of your peers is likely to include some who have the same views as you. Thankfully for the justice system theres a presumption of innocence, and the prosecution have to prove beyond reasonable doubt...Mussels wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:01 pmI agree, the defence just managed to throw enough shade over it that the jury couldn't be sure, expect this as the standard defence for any rioters, looters or vandals from now until we get a clearer law.Yorick wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 5:58 pm This is an interesting read. Not sure what to make of it. Still think it's vandalism.
https://thesecretbarrister.com/2022/01/ ... ould-know/
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: In todays news...
Here's an objective measure.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:04 pmI see your point here, but....
Things now are better than they were, IMO. I don't think we're in danger of world peace and universal free bum love breaking out any time soon, but they ARE better. If you look at almost any objective measure human life has got steadily better over the last centuries.
Surely that only happened because people thought it was possible to, and therefore tried to, clean up some of the stains? Somewhat ironically Coulson seems like he may actually have been one of those people if you look at his other activities. But nobodies perfect eh?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... id-females
Life expectancy for men in the UK has fallen for the first time since current records began 40 years ago because of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic, figures show.
A boy born between 2018 and 2020 is expected to live until he is 79 years old, down from 79.2 for the period of 2015-17, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno
- Horse
- Posts: 11563
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6199 times
- Been thanked: 5090 times
Re: In todays news...
At a guess, Dazzle, 'almost' means there are some to be found?irie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:02 pmHere's an objective measure.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:04 pm I see your point here, but....
If you look at almost any objective measure human life has got steadily better over the last centuries.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... id-femalesLife expectancy for men in the UK has fallen for the first time since current records began 40 years ago because of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic
I suppose that a long life isn't always a better life anyway.
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 13965
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:57 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
- Has thanked: 2552 times
- Been thanked: 6260 times
Re: In todays news...
Well done for finding a blip with a pretty obvious set of extenuating circumstances.
What's your next trick? Pointing out that male mortality in the age bracket 18-25 was higher than usual in 1943?
-
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:38 pm
- Location: North East Essex
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: In todays news...
Maybe that's what the "almost" means. If you think a longer life is not better then, for you, things have got worse.Horse wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:10 pmAt a guess, Dazzle, 'almost' means there are some to be found?irie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:02 pmHere's an objective measure.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:04 pm I see your point here, but....
If you look at almost any objective measure human life has got steadily better over the last centuries.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... id-femalesLife expectancy for men in the UK has fallen for the first time since current records began 40 years ago because of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic
I suppose that a long life isn't always a better life anyway.
- Horse
- Posts: 11563
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:30 am
- Location: Always sunny southern England
- Has thanked: 6199 times
- Been thanked: 5090 times
Re: In todays news...
What does 'better' mean, how does one person have a better life than another?Saga Lout wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:09 pmMaybe that's what the "almost" means. If you think a longer life is not better then, for you, things have got worse.Horse wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:10 pmAt a guess, Dazzle, 'almost' means there are some to be found?irie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:02 pm
Here's an objective measure.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... id-females
I suppose that a long life isn't always a better life anyway.
I noticed your so won't get all maudlin or serious
Even bland can be a type of character
-
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:38 pm
- Location: North East Essex
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: In todays news...
What does "better" mean? In this case it's a matter of opinion, if you think your life is better, it's better. I happen to think dying at 30 from smallpox or ague or whatever people used to die of a couple of hundred years ago is not better than living to 70 or 80 in reasonably good health as most of us do.
Here, have another one of these:
- irie
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:09 pm
- Location: Noviomagus Reginorum
- Has thanked: 1482 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: In todays news...
I didn't find "the blip", it was publicly available, you just weren't aware it was there. You snooze, you lose.Mr. Dazzle wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:54 pmWell done for finding a blip with a pretty obvious set of extenuating circumstances.
What's your next trick? Pointing out that male mortality in the age bracket 18-25 was higher than usual in 1943?
"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people." - Giordano Bruno